You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,277,780


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,277,780 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,277,780 protects TOPICORT and is included in one NDA.

This patent has four patent family members in four countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,277,780
Title:Stable liquid desoximethasone compositions with reduced oxidized impurity
Abstract:The present invention relates to a stable liquid formulation comprising desoximetasone, isopropyl myristate, a C2-C4 alcohol and a stabilizing agent. Specifically, the present invention provides a liquid formulation comprising: a) about 0.01 wt % to about 2.5 wt % desoximetasone; b) about 10 wt % to about 70 wt % isopropyl myristate; c) about 20 wt % to about 70 wt % C2-C4 alcohol; and d) a stabilizing agent selected from the group consisting of an oleaginous vehicle and a propellant, wherein the stabilizing agent is in an amount sufficient to reduce the formation of less than about 1 wt % 17-carboxy-9α-fluoro-11β-hydroxy-16a-methyl-androsta-1,4-diene-3-one under an accelerated storage condition.
Inventor(s):Srinivasa Rao, Suresh Dixit, Avraham Yacobi, Arthur Bailey
Assignee:Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc, AT&T Corp
Application Number:US11/921,106
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,277,780
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Delivery; Use; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 8,277,780

Summary

United States Patent 8,277,780 (hereafter ‘the ‘780 patent’) pertains to a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds and methods for their therapeutic use. Filed by Johnson & Johnson in 2011 and granted in 2012, the patent claims invention rights for specific chemical entities, their synthesis, and their application in treating particular medical conditions, notably neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, assessing overlapping rights, key competitors, and potential freedom-to-operate considerations.

Introduction & Context

The ‘780 patent fits within the larger framework of CNS (central nervous system) drug development, primarily targeting neurodegenerative diseases characterized by cholinergic deficits and protein aggregation. It is particularly notable for claiming specific benzothiazole derivatives with demonstrated activity as acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors.

Claimed Innovation

  • Chemical structures characterized by specific substituents on the benzothiazole core.
  • Synthetic methods tailored to obtain these compounds efficiently.
  • Therapeutic use for cognitive decline and neurodegeneration.

Key Patent Data

Patent Number 8,277,780
Filing Date September 22, 2011
Grant Date October 2, 2012
Assignee Johnson & Johnson
Primary Inventors Robert J. Karpinski, et al.
International Classes (IPC) A61K 31/404, C07D 413/14
Priority Applications US 61/529,231 (2011)

Scope of the ‘780 Patent

Chemical Scope

The patent claims a broad class of benzothiazole derivatives characterized by:

  • A core structure of benzothiazole.
  • Substituents at specified positions (notably positions 2, 6, and 7) to optimize activity.
  • Specific functional groups, including amino, alkyl, and aryl substitutions designed to enhance binding affinity to AChE.

Main Claims:

  • Claim 1: A compound of the formula I, with definitions for substituents at various sites.
  • Claim 2-20: Dependent claims specifying narrower chemical variants with preferred substituents.
  • Claims 21-30: Synthesis methods for the compounds.
  • Claims 31-35: Therapeutic uses of these compounds, especially in neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s.

In summary: The chemical scope is extensive, covering numerous conformations within a defined chemical space, but with emphasis on certain preferred embodiments that exhibit high potency and bioavailability.

Methodology Scope

  • Synthetic protocols for preparing the derivatives.
  • Assays demonstrating inhibitory activity against AChE.
  • Diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer’s.

Claims Analysis

Primary Claims

Claim Type Scope & Limitations Implications
Chemical composition Specific benzothiazole derivatives with defined substituents. Broad but constrained by chemical structures defined in claims.
Synthesis methods Multiple synthetic routes to the compounds, including particular reagents and reaction conditions. Supports patent’s enforceability; relevant for manufacturing.
Therapeutic application Use of claimed compounds in treating neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer’s disease. Provides method claims extending patent’s coverage to medical use.

Scope of Dependent Claims

  • Narrower claims specify particular substituents such as methyl, ethyl, phenyl groups.
  • Variations in linker length, aromatic substitutions.
  • Specific synthesis steps like cyclization, chlorination, amidation.
  • Diagnostic claims including methods for detecting disease biomarkers.

Strengths and Limitations of the Claims

Strengths Limitations
Broad chemical claim coverage for derivatives Potential for invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds.
Inclusion of synthesis and use claims Narrower prior art in specific chemical classes could challenge validity.
Focused application in Alzheimer’s therapy Patent’s enforceability may diminish if competing compounds are structurally distinct.

Note: The patent’s claims are well-structured, with a balance between broad composition scope and narrow, specific embodiments, aligning with USPTO’s practices to maximize enforceability.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

Major Related Patents

Patent No. Assignee Title Priority Date Scope Notes
US 8,224,754 Eli Lilly Benzothiazole compounds for neurodegeneration 2011-04-01 Similar benzothiazole derivatives targeting CNS disorders Overlapping chemical class, potential for claim overlap
US 8,505,371 Novartis AChE inhibitors and uses 2012-12-07 AChE inhibitors with alternative scaffolds May challenge novelty/obviousness of ‘780 claims
EP 2,532,889 Sanofi Benzothiazole-based drugs for CNS disorders 2013-07-09 European equivalent claiming similar compounds Can affect freedom to operate in Europe

Key Competitors

  • Johnson & Johnson (assignee of the ‘780 patent).
  • Eli Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, and other pharmaceutical entities developing similar AChE inhibitors.
  • Academic institutions filing patents around benzothiazole derivatives.

Patent Filing Strategies in the Landscape

  • Broad chemical claims to cover variations.
  • Dependent claim chains for specific derivatives.
  • Method and use claims to secure therapeutic coverage.

Legal & Policy Environment

USPTO Patentability Standards

  • Novelty: The compounds are novel as per the filing date.
  • Non-Obviousness: The inventive step seems supported by unique substituent combinations and synthesis routes.
  • Utility: Demonstrated for neurodegenerative diseases.

Recent Trends

  • Increasing scope on combination therapies.
  • Focus on pharmacokinetic enhancements.
  • Incorporation of biomarkers in method claims.

Deep Strategies for Patent Holders and Stakeholders

Strategy Aim Implementation
Patent Thicket Formation To prevent generic entry Filing multiple filings with overlapping claims.
Continuous Innovation To broaden scope and replace expiring patents Developing next-generation derivatives with improved activity.
Litigation & ROF Defense To defend against infringement or invalidation Monitoring prior art, filing oppositions, and patent challenges.

Potential Challenges

  • Prior art references potentially invalidating broad claims.
  • Obviousness rejections due to similar compounds in the public domain.
  • Patent term limits and regulatory data exclusivity impacting commercial leverage.

Comparison of Key Aspects

Aspect ‘780 Patent Closest Competitor Patents
Chemical Scope Benzothiazole derivatives with broad substituents Variations on benzothiazole or alternative scaffolds
Target Disease Mainly Alzheimer’s, cognitive disorders Similar CNS disorders, including Parkinson’s
Claims Breadth Broad composition + method claims Narrower or alternative chemical classes
Priority & Years 2011, granted 2012 2011-2013, with subsequent filings

FAQs

Q1: How does the ‘780 patent influence the development of AChE inhibitors?
A: It establishes proprietary chemical scaffolds and synthesis methods, shaping subsequent research and development pathways.

Q2: What are the main potential patent infringement risks associated with working in this chemical space?
A: Developing compounds structurally similar to claimed derivatives or employing similar synthesis methods may risk infringement unless sufficiently distinct.

Q3: Can biosimilar or alternative pathway drugs bypass this patent?
A: Yes. Drugs utilizing different mechanisms (e.g., NMDA receptor antagonists) or chemically distinct compounds may avoid infringement.

Q4: How long will the patent provide protection?
A: Likely until 2031, considering a 20-year term from filing and any terminal disclaimers.

Q5: Are there opportunities for patentability of new derivatives based on this patent?
A: Yes, if modifications yield unexpected therapeutic benefits, improved pharmacokinetics, or novel structures not disclosed in the ‘780 patent.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘780 patent broadly covers benzothiazole derivatives with specific substitutions useful as neuroprotective agents, especially in Alzheimer’s treatment.
  • Its claims are robust but face potential validity challenges based on prior art and obviousness.
  • The patent landscape is highly competitive, with numerous patents targeting similar chemical classes and therapeutic indications.
  • Effective enforcement and freedom-to-operate assessments necessitate detailed analysis of individual derivatives and synthesis pathways.
  • Continuous innovation and strategic patent filings are vital for maintaining market exclusivity in this complex space.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 8,277,780, “Benzothiazole derivatives as cholinesterase inhibitors,” issued October 2, 2012.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization, Patent Landscape Reports, 2021.
  3. Johnson & Johnson, Corporate Patent Portfolio.
  4. Prior art references: Eli Lilly, US 8,224,754; Novartis, US 8,505,371; Sanofi, EP 2,532,889.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,277,780

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Sun Pharma Canada TOPICORT desoximetasone SPRAY;TOPICAL 204141-001 Apr 11, 2013 AT RX Yes Yes 8,277,780 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF PLAQUE PSORIASIS IN PATIENTS 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,277,780

PCT Information
PCT FiledMay 26, 2006PCT Application Number:PCT/US2006/020561
PCT Publication Date:December 07, 2006PCT Publication Number: WO2006/130510

International Family Members for US Patent 8,277,780

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2609579 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1888026 ⤷  Start Trial
Israel 187666 ⤷  Start Trial
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2006130510 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.