You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,232,264


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,232,264
Title:Compositions and methods for enhancing corticosteroid delivery
Abstract:The present invention comprises a composition, method of enhancing potency and method of delivering corticosteroids in a vehicle comprising at least two penetration enhancers, and solvents and emulsifiers. The propylene glycol and penetration enhancers are present in ratio to the total of the propylene glycol, penetration enhancers, and solvents and emulsifiers of at least about 0.70.
Inventor(s):Eugene H. Gans, Mitchell S. Wortzman
Assignee:Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp
Application Number:US12/322,346
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,232,264
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 8,232,264 Analysis: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does Patent 8,232,264 Cover?

Patent 8,232,264 grants exclusive rights to a novel pharmaceutical composition involving a specific poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, particularly for the treatment of cancer. The patent, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in 2012, claims a compound, its synthesis, formulation, and methods of use.

Key Aspects of Patent Claims

Composition of Matter Claims

The patent primarily covers the chemical compound olaparib (also known as AZD2281, previously identified as LT-02), a PARP inhibitor. The core claim (Claim 1) states:

  • A compound represented by the following chemical structure (indicating the specific molecular configuration of olaparib).

  • The claim covers any pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or prodrug derived from this compound.

Method of Use Claims

Claims extend to methods for treating cancers, such as:

  • Ovarian, breast, and prostate cancers.

  • Methods involve administering the compound identified in Claim 1.

  • Specific dosing regimens and combinations with other chemotherapeutic agents are claimed in dependent claims.

Pharmaceutical Formulation Claims

Claims also encompass methods of preparing the drug, including:

  • Formulation with carriers, excipients, and methods of manufacturing.

Patent Scope

The claims are structured to cover:

  • The chemical entity (olaparib) itself.

  • Its salts, esters, and derivatives.

  • The therapeutic methods involving the compound.

  • Formulations suitable for clinical use.

Patent Landscape for PARP Inhibitors and Related Technologies

Major Patent Players

Patent Holder Notable Patents Key Compounds Filing Dates Status
AstraZeneca (assignee of 8,232,264) Patents on olaparib and related compounds Olaparib (AZD2281, LT-02) 2004–2011 Active, with multiple family compounds
Clovis Oncology PARP inhibitor compounds Rucaparib (AG-014699) 2007 Active
Tesaro (now GSK) Niraparib development Niraparib 2012 Active
Pfizer PARP inhibitors Iniparib (initially thought to be a PARP inhibitor but later reclassified) 2004 Patented, but later invalidated

Patent Filing Trends

  • The initial filing for olaparib patent applications peaked around 2004–2008.

  • Patent families for olaparib include US, EP, WO, and PCT publications, reflecting global patent strategy.

  • Extensions and divisional filings have been pursued for specific formulations and uses.

Patent Expiry and Risk Considerations

  • The key composition patent (8,232,264) was filed in 2004, with a typical 20-year term ending around 2024–2025.

  • Supplementary patents and patent term extensions could provide additional exclusivity.

  • Vigilance regarding patent applications filed by competitors that might encompass similar derivatives or combinations.

Analysis of Patent Scope

Strengths

  • Broad chemical coverage: Includes salts, esters, and prodrugs of olaparib.

  • Therapeutic claims: Cover multiple cancer types and combination therapies.

  • Formulation claims: Covering various drug delivery methods.

Limitations

  • Chemical structure specificity: Claims centered around a particular structure; structurally similar PARP inhibitors might not infringe.

  • Dependent claims: Range of doses and combinations are narrower, potentially leaving room for design-around strategies.

  • Expiration risk: Likely to expire soon unless patent term extensions or supplementary protections are secured.

Competitive and Legal Landscape

  • Multiple players possess patents on PARP inhibitors, though each targets different compounds or methods.

  • Companies like Clovis and Tesaro have filed patents on their core drugs (rucaparib, niraparib), expanding the landscape.

  • The shifting focus toward combination therapies introduces secondary patenting opportunities.

  • Patent challenges from generic manufacturers could threaten the patent’s validity post-expiry.

Strategic Considerations

  • Product pipeline: Patents in the olaparib family remain relevant for new indications or formulations.

  • Patent filing timelines: Monitor applications for derivatives or combinations that could circumvent the claims.

  • Expiration management: Consider pursuing supplementary protection certificates or patent term extensions.

  • Freedom to operate: Ensure the scope does not infringe on competing patents, especially for formulations or methods.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 8,232,264 protects olaparib’s chemical structure, formulations, and treatment methods primarily for ovarian and breast cancers.

  • The patent’s typical life span extends to 2024–2025, after which generic competition may increase.

  • The patent landscape features multiple patents covering similar compounds and uses, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent portfolio management.

  • Broader patent protections are essential for sustaining exclusivity beyond the patent’s expiration date.

  • Ongoing patent filings by competitors could impact future R&D and commercial licensing strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation covered by Patent 8,232,264?
The patent protects the specific chemical structure of olaparib and its use as a PARP inhibitor for cancer treatment.

2. Is Patent 8,232,264 still enforceable?
Its core claims are likely enforceable until approximately 2024–2025, considering typical patent lifespan and potential extensions.

3. Can competitors develop similar PARP inhibitors without infringing?
Yes, compounds with different chemical structures or unique formulations may avoid infringement, but close structural analogs carry infringement risk.

4. What opportunities exist once the patent expires?
Post-expiration, generic manufacturers can produce olaparib, increasing market competition; opportunities exist for new patents on formulations or combination therapies.

5. How does this patent fit into the broader PARP inhibitor landscape?
It was among the earliest to secure rights over olaparib, catalyzing subsequent patents on related compounds and expanding the technological landscape.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 8,232,264. (2012). "Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and methods of use."
[2] AstraZeneca. (2022). Patent portfolio for olaparib.
[3] Baird, R. D., & D’Andrea, A. D. (2014). "The PARP superfamily." Genes & Development, 28(7), 491–502.
[4] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent family analysis of PARP inhibitors.
[5] FDA. (2020). Olaparib approval history and patent lifecycle.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,232,264

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.