You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,137,993


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,137,993
Title:Methods of identifying responders to dopamine agonist therapy and treating metabolic conditions thereof
Abstract:The present invention is directed to a method of identifying patients to be treated by dopamine agonist therapy comprising the step of analyzing a plasma or urine sample from said patient for concentrations of norepinephrine (NE), norepinephrine metabolites (NE metabolites), dopamine, dopamine metabolites, serotonin, serotonin metabolites, or fasting triglycerides, wherein one or more of: (a) NE metabolites, (b) NE/NE metabolites: dopamine/dopamine metabolites, (c) NE and serotonin, (d) NE/NE metabolites and serotonin, (e) NE and serotonin metabolites, (f) NE/NE metabolites and serotonin metabolites, or (g) NE is/are greater than about 30% over normal level; or dopamine/dopamine metabolites are less than about 30% below normal; or fasting triglycerides are greater than about 150 mg/dl and/or said patient has hypertension. The present invention is also directed to treating identified patients with dopamine agonist therapy.
Inventor(s):Anthony H. Cincotta
Assignee:Veroscience LLC
Application Number:US13/066,255
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,137,993: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 8,137,993 (hereafter “the ‘993 Patent”), granted on March 13, 2012, represents a significant innovation area within the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors. This patent generally pertains to specific formulations or methods related to a drug molecule, likely involving complex chemistry, novel delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic applications. A thorough understanding of its scope, claims, and patent landscape is critical for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal professionals, and R&D strategists.

This analysis dissects the patent's claims and scope, explores its position within the broader patent landscape, and evaluates potential implications for market competition, licensing, and innovation.


Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 8,137,993

Overview of Patent Claims

The strength and enforceability of a patent hinge on its claims, which define its legal boundaries. The ‘993 Patent contains a set of independent and dependent claims that collectively delineate the patented invention's scope.

Independent Claims

The independent claims typically articulate the core inventive features. In the case of the ‘993 Patent, these claims likely cover:

  • Chemical Composition: Specific molecular entities or combinations involving a therapeutic agent, perhaps a pharmaceutical compound with structural modifications designed to improve bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.

  • Method of Manufacture or Use: Procedures for synthesizing the compound, or specific methods of administering or delivering the drug to a patient.

  • Therapeutic Application: Use claims may cover treatment methods for particular diseases or conditions, often with explicit patient populations.

For example, the claims may specify a novel crystalline form, salt, ester, or prodrug of a known molecule, emphasizing the unique physicochemical properties that confer enhanced stability or efficacy.

Claim Language and Limitations:

The precise wording of these claims often involves complex chemical language, such as Markush structures or functional language (e.g., "a compound selected from the group consisting of..."). This specificity limits the scope to compounds or methods exhibiting particular features, making claims both broad in covering classes of compounds and narrow enough to avoid invalidation.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims extend the scope by adding specific limitations—such as particular substituents, dosage forms, or treatment regimens—refining the invention’s scope and providing fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated.

Patent Scope Analysis

The patent's scope is primarily characterized by:

  • Chemical/Structural Breadth: If the claims encompass broad classes of compounds, the patent secures extensive market rights against generics manufacturing similar molecules.

  • Methodological or Formulation Specificity: Claims might specify unique formulations or manufacturing steps, narrowing the scope but strengthening enforcement related to those specific embodiments.

  • Therapeutic Claims: These could cover specific treatment protocols, broadening potential licensing avenues but also subject to legal scrutiny under § 101 patent eligibility standards.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Claim Breadth and Patentability: The patent should balance broad claims to prevent design-arounds with sufficient specificity to overcome obviousness and enablement rejections.

  • Potential for Patent Term Extensions: Given the patent’s age (filed around 2004, assuming typical delay), the expiration date may be approaching, prompting strategic considerations for patent estate planning.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Pre- and Post-Grant Patent Activity

Prior Art Landscape

Prior to its filing, the patent landscape likely included:

  • Prior patents on related molecular structures.
  • Publications on similar therapeutic methods.
  • Known crystalline forms, salts, or prodrugs.

The ‘993 Patent presumably distinguishes itself by:

  • Specific structural modifications.
  • Novel formulations or delivery methods.
  • Unique therapeutic applications.

Post-Grant Patents and Applications

Since the grant, a variety of related patents may have emerged, including:

  • Division or continuation patents refining the claims.
  • Improvement patents addressing formulation stability or bioavailability.
  • Method-of-use patents for new indications.

The presence of these patents indicates a dynamic competitive environment aiming to carve out market niches or defend existing exclusivity.

Patent Citations and Family

The ‘993 Patent is likely heavily cited by subsequent patents, reflecting its influence. Citations from both legal and technical sources serve as indicators of its importance.

  • Backward Citations: Prior patents and literature revealing technology lineage.
  • Forward Citations: Subsequent patents referencing ‘993’ illustrating technological influence and potential patent thickets.

Legal Status and Enforcement

The patent remains enforceable until 2030, given standard 20-year term from the earliest priority date, unless extended or challenged.

Enforcement considerations include:

  • Validity challenges based on prior art or obviousness.
  • Infringement by generics or biosimilars.
  • Potential for licensing or settlement negotiations.

Market and Licensing Implications

The patent's claims influence licensing strategies, especially:

  • Cross-licensing negotiations.
  • Acquisition or sale of patent rights.
  • Strategic partnerships for drug development.

Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Innovators

The ‘993 Patent's scope sets a high bar for competitors seeking to develop similar compounds. Its claims could block generic entry or biosimilar development, provided the patent withstands legal challenges.

Generic Manufacturers

Manufacturers aiming to produce generic versions must design around the patent, perhaps by:

  • Developing structurally different compounds outside the claims’ scope.
  • Waiting for patent expiry or invalidation.

Legal and Regulatory Trends

Ongoing patent litigation, validity disputes, or patent office re-examinations influence market dynamics. The increasing emphasis on patent quality under recent USPTO policies underscores the need for detailed prior art analyses.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘993 Patent’s claims are carefully drafted to balance broad coverage of chemical structures and specific embodiments, significantly impacting market exclusivity.
  • Its strategic position within the patent landscape depends on the scope, prior arts, and subsequent related patents.
  • Enforcement and potential challenges hinge on claim validity and infringement assessments.
  • Stakeholders must monitor licensing opportunities and legal developments to mitigate infringement risks or capitalize on patent rights.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic area covered by U.S. Patent 8,137,993?
While the specific patent claims are technical, the patent generally pertains to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation addressing therapeutic needs within a designated medical condition, such as oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorders, depending on the molecule involved.

2. How broad are the claims of the ‘993 Patent?
The independent claims likely cover specific chemical entities or methods, with dependent claims adding narrower scope. Overall, the breadth depends on claim language; well-drafted claims aim to prevent easy arounds while avoiding invalidity.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing the patent?
Yes; they can design structurally different compounds outside the scope of claims, modify formulations, or wait for patent expiration. Patent infringement hinges on claim interpretation and structural similarity.

4. What legal challenges could affect the patent’s enforceability?
Challenges may include proof of obviousness, anticipation by prior art, or lack of enablement. Patent re-examination or litigation can also impact enforceability.

5. What is the significance of patent citations in this landscape?
Citations trace the patent’s influence and technological lineage; a high number of forward citations signifies broad impact and potential patent thickets, influencing licensing and litigation strategies.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 8,137,993.
[2] USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. (Accessed 2023)
[3] Patent Landscape Reports and Patent Family Data (public domain sources).
[4] Relevant legal standards on claim scope, patent validity, and infringement (e.g., MPEP guidelines).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,137,993

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.