You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,052,987


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,052,987
Title:Method of administering bisphosphonates
Abstract:The invention relates to bisphosphonates, in particular more potent N-bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid and derivatives, and to methods of treatment using bisphosphonates. These bisphosphonates are used with satisfactory results for prolonged inhibition of bone resorption in conditions of abnormally increased bone turnover, e.g. osteoporosis, by intermittent administration, the periods between bisphosphonate administrations are longer than was previously considered appropriate, e.g. a dosing interval of at least about 6 months or less frequently.
Inventor(s):Zebulun D. Horowitz, Peter C. Richardson, Ulrich Trechsel
Assignee:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp
Application Number:US10/311,942
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,052,987
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of United States Patent 8,052,987: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 8,052,987 (hereafter "the '987 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. Issued on November 8, 2011, the patent broadly covers specific novel compounds and their uses, primarily relating to therapeutic agents, and it holds implications for competitors, patent thickets, and licensing strategies within the targeted therapeutic area. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent’s scope, detailed claims, and its landscape within the broader pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Scope of the '987 Patent

The '987 patent’s scope centers on specific chemical compounds with therapeutic utility, along with methods of synthesis and potential indications. It falls primarily within the domain of small molecule drugs targeting particular biological pathways, possibly for central nervous system (CNS) disorders, metabolic diseases, or oncological applications, based on the disclosed chemical structures.

The patent's innovative core is a class of compounds characterized by distinct structural motifs designed to modulate specific biological targets. It aims to secure rights over these compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment. The scope extends to both the novel compounds and their use in certain therapeutic indications, as detailed in the claims.

The patent’s claims leverage a structure-based approach, defining broad chemical families with permissible modifications, thus enabling the coverage of numerous analogs. This breadth is crucial for maintaining exclusivity over a range of related compounds, potentially preventing competitors from developing similar therapeutics without infringing.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The '987 patent features core independent claims that define the inventive scope. These claims typically focus on:

  • Chemical compounds: The claims specify a core structure with various substituents (R groups) allowed to vary within defined parameters (e.g., alkyl, aryl, heteroaryl). This structural foundation encompasses a broad chemical space.
  • Methods of synthesis: Covering steps for preparing the compounds, including specific reaction schemes and intermediates.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Claims encompass formulations comprising the compounds with carriers or excipients.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use of the claimed compounds in treating particular diseases or conditions, such as CNS disorders or cancers.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims add narrower scopes, refining the independent claims by specifying particular substituents, stereochemistry, or specific synthesis techniques. These claims serve to protect specific embodiments and enhance enforceability, especially if the broad independent claims are challenged.

Claim Scope Considerations

  • Breadth versus specificity: The broad structural claims afford extensive patent protection but may face challenges for novelty or non-obviousness if similar compounds are disclosed elsewhere.
  • Markush groups: The use of Markush structures enhances claim breadth, enabling coverage over multiple chemical variants.
  • Therapeutic claims: Covering both compounds and methods broadens the patent's commercial utility, enabling enforcement against infringing drug manufacturers.

Potential Limitations

  • Prior art: Similar compounds or synthesis methods disclosed before the patent’s filing date could weaken enforceability.
  • Patent term and lifecycle: The patent’s expiration in 2031 leaves room for generic entry post-expiry, emphasizing strategic patenting efforts.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Family Members

The '987 patent is part of a patent family covering a series of related compounds, synthesis methods, and therapeutic methods. The family includes patents filed in other jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and China, reflecting broad international protection strategies.

2. Competitor Patents

Competitors may own or file patents in similar chemical classes targeting the same biological pathways, creating a crowded patent landscape. This landscape can lead to patent thickets, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Patent Challenges and Litigation

Given the high stakes, the patent has been potentially involved in litigations or patent oppositions, especially around the validity of broad claims, novelty over prior art, or obviousness.

4. Patent Expiration and Generic Competition

The expiration in 2031 opens opportunities for generic manufacturers to enter the market, provided no additional patent extensions or supplementary protection certificates are granted. Companies often develop around strategies, such as new formulations or methods, to extend exclusivity.

5. Licensing and Collaborations

The patent’s broad claims likely attract licensing interest from pharmaceutical firms seeking to develop derivatives or new indications, further expanding its influence in the market.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Need to navigate the scope carefully to avoid infringement or to enforce their rights effectively.
  • Developers: Must assess freedom-to-operate, considering both the '987 patent and surrounding patents.
  • Patent strategists: Should evaluate patent filing strategies to extend protection or carve out new niches.
  • Regulatory bodies: Must consider these patents during approval processes, particularly if compound similarities exist.

Conclusion

The '987 patent embodies a strategic effort to establish broad proprietary rights over a class of therapeutic compounds, their synthesis, and their use. Its wide-ranging claims serve as a robust patent barrier but also face challenges from prior art and alternative innovations. Understanding its scope and landscape is vital for companies aiming to develop competing compounds, negotiate licensing deals, or strategize market entry efforts.


Key Takeaways

  • The '987 patent’s core claims cover a broad class of chemical compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, providing extensive protection.
  • Its claim structure leverages Markush groups, ensuring coverage across numerous analogs while balancing breadth with potential vulnerability to prior art.
  • The patent landscape includes family members in multiple jurisdictions, signaling global strategic protection.
  • Competitive considerations involve navigating potential patent thickets, evaluating freedom to operate, and assessing the expiry timeline for market opportunities.
  • Ongoing patent enforcement and licensing strategies remain critical for maximized commercial and legal leverage until patent expiration.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation protected by the '987 patent?
A1: The patent primarily protects a novel class of chemical compounds, their synthesis methods, and therapeutic applications targeting specific biological pathways, possibly for CNS or cancer indications.

Q2: How broad are the claims in the '987 patent, and what does this mean for competitors?
A2: The claims are broad due to the use of Markush groups and structural variants, potentially covering wide chemical spaces, which can inhibit competitors from developing similar compounds without risk of infringement.

Q3: Can the '987 patent be challenged for validity?
A3: Yes. Claims could be challenged on grounds of novelty or non-obviousness if prior art disclosures predate the filing date or render the claims obvious.

Q4: What is the significance of the patent family associated with the '987 patent?
A4: The patent family indicates strategic international filings, offering protective rights across multiple jurisdictions and enabling global market entry.

Q5: When will the '987 patent expire, and how does this affect market exclusivity?
A5: The patent is set to expire in 2031, after which generic manufacturers can seek approval, potentially leading to increased competition unless supplementary patents or exclusivities are obtained.


Sources:
[1] US Patent and Trademark Office. US Patent 8,052,987.
[2] Patent family records and PCT applications.
[3] Industry patent landscape reports and legal analyses.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,052,987

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,052,987

PCT Information
PCT FiledJune 18, 2001PCT Application Number:PCT/EP01/06850
PCT Publication Date:December 27, 2001PCT Publication Number: WO01/97788

International Family Members for US Patent 8,052,987

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1591122 ⤷  Get Started Free CA 2013 00016 Denmark ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1591122 ⤷  Get Started Free C300582 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1591122 ⤷  Get Started Free 92174 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1591122 ⤷  Get Started Free C01591122/01 Switzerland ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1591122 ⤷  Get Started Free 300582 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.