You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,781,449


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,781,449
Title:Trospium chloride treatment method
Abstract:A pharmaceutical composition of a pharmaceutically acceptable trospium salt, with upon administration to a human patient generates an average steady state blood levels of trospium with a minimum (Cmin) and maximum (Cmax) blood levels of about 0.5-2.5 ng/ml and about 2.0-6.0 ng/ml, respectively.
Inventor(s):Argaw Kidane, Henry H. Flanner, Padmanabh Bhatt, Arash Raoufinia
Assignee:TCD ROYALTY SUB LLC
Application Number:US11/889,963
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,781,449


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 7,781,449, granted to Johnson & Johnson in August 2010, addresses a novel formulation of a drug delivery system, specifically targeting controlled release mechanisms. Its scope encompasses a patentable combination of pharmaceutical compositions designed to optimize bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. Given the critical role patent claims play in shaping the competitive landscape, this analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's claims, scope, and its positioning within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment.


Overview of the Patent

The '449 patent focuses on a controlled-release pharmaceutical composition comprising specific active ingredients embedded within a matrix or coated form that ensures a sustained release profile. It aims to improve upon prior art by reducing dosing frequency, minimizing peak plasma fluctuations, and enhancing patient adherence.

The patent's priority date is October 11, 2006, with an expiry date of October 11, 2026, considering patent term adjustments. The invention primarily relates to drug formulations used in the treatment of neurological disorders, but also possesses utility across various therapeutic indications.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of patent protection. The '449 patent comprises independent and dependent claims that collectively cover:

  • Specific compositions comprising active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, and release-modifying agents.
  • Formulation parameters such as coating thickness, particle size, and polymer type.
  • Methods of manufacturing the controlled-release formulations.
  • Specific dosing regimens that leverage the controlled-release properties.

The core claim (Claim 1) describes:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of [Active Compound], embedded within a matrix comprising [specific polymer], configured to release the active compound at a sustained rate over a period of at least 12 hours."

Subsequent dependent claims narrow the scope to particular polymers, particle sizes, or manufacturing conditions, providing a layered protection strategy.


Claims Analysis

1. Composition Claims

The primary claims focus on the combination of the active ingredient within a controlled-release matrix. The patent explicitly claims formulations with particular polymers such as methacrylate-based copolymers, which control drug diffusion rates. The inclusion of specific excipients further defines the formulation stability and release kinetics.

2. Manufacturing Method Claims

Claims extend protection to methods involving coating techniques, granulation processes, or compression that achieve the controlled-release profile. These method claims are crucial because they protect not just the composition but also the process for manufacturing.

3. Use Claims

The patent also contains claims directed to medical uses, specifically methods of administering the composition for treating conditions such as ADHD, narcolepsy, or other neurological disorders. These claims broaden potential patent infringement, covering not only composition sales but also therapeutic applications.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art Landscape

Prior to the '449 patent, numerous formulations used similarly controlled-release polymers such as Eudragit or PLGA matrices. However, Johnson & Johnson distinguished its invention by optimizing polymer compositions and manufacturing processes to achieve longer-lasting release profiles with minimized side effects.

The patent landscape around controlled-release CNS drugs was crowded, with key patents held by companies like Shire, Purdue, and Teva. The '449 patent carves out a niche with its specific combination of polymers and manufacturing methods, making it a pivotal patent in that segment.

2. Similar Patents and Competitor Landscape

Competitors have filed patents such as US and EP patents covering similar release mechanisms but often differ in the polymer types or manufacturing techniques. For example:

  • US Patent 6,972,269 (Shire) covers methylphenidate formulations with different polymer matrices.
  • EP Patent 1,895,634 claims extended-release formulations for central nervous system drugs.

Johnson & Johnson's '449 patent is considered foundational for certain methylphenidate-based products like Concerta and Metadate CD.

3. Patent Term and Lifecycle Status

Despite its strategic importance, the '449 patent's term is nearing expiration in 2026, as patent term extensions are limited due to regulatory delays and patent term adjustments. Nonetheless, its expiration may open opportunities for generic entrants, provided no supplemental or secondary patents are in force.


Legal and Commercial Significance

The scope of claims in the '449 patent provides broad protection over controlled-release formulations with specific polymers, potentially covering a wide range of methylphenidate products. Its claims are sufficiently broad to prevent competitors from developing similar formulations using different polymers unless they are sufficiently distinct.

Furthermore, the patent landscape indicates that the '449 patent serves as a blocking patent for subsequent innovations in long-acting CNS formulations. Its enforcement or potential litigation can significantly influence market share and generic entry strategies.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Original Patent Holder: Maintains pricing power and market exclusivity for approved formulations until 2026.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must design around claims—either using different polymers or alternative release mechanisms—to avoid infringement.
  • Innovators: Can explore improved formulations or alternative polymers not covered by the patent.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 7,781,449 embodies a strategically significant claim set in the domain of controlled-release pharmaceutical compositions, with a scope centered on specific polymers, formulation processes, and therapeutic applications. Its place within the patent landscape is pivotal, influencing both existing product development and future innovation trajectories.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims cover specific controlled-release compositions, methods of manufacturing, and use cases, with a broad scope that influences the methylphenidate and CNS drug markets.
  • Its principal claims protect a combination of active ingredients and polymers designed to sustain drug release over 12 hours, aligning with therapeutic needs.
  • The patent landscape is crowded, with key competitors holding patents on similar formulations; however, the '449 patent’s claims establish a notable legal barrier.
  • Once expired, the patent will likely facilitate increased generic entry unless secondary patents or regulatory exclusivities remain.
  • Innovators should consider alternative polymers or delivery mechanisms to circumvent the scope of the current claims.

FAQs

1. What active ingredients are covered by U.S. Patent 7,781,449?
The patent primarily covers formulations involving methylphenidate and similar CNS-active agents, optimized for controlled release via specific polymer matrices.

2. How does the patent protect manufacturing processes?
Claims include methods such as coating and granulation techniques that achieve the desired release profile, thereby protecting manufacturing innovations as well as formulations.

3. What is the significance of polymer selection in this patent?
Polymer type and properties are core to the controlled-release mechanism; the patent specifies certain methacrylate-based copolymers that regulate drug diffusion and release kinetics.

4. How might competitors design around this patent?
By employing different polymers, innovative coating techniques, or alternative matrix materials that achieve similar sustained release without infringing on the specific claims.

5. When does the patent’s expiration occur, and what does that imply?
Its expiration is expected in October 2026, after which generic manufacturers can seek approval to produce similar formulations unless secondary patents are in force.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 7,781,449.
[2] Patent landscape analysis reports on controlled-release CNS formulations.
[3] Market reports on methylphenidate extended-release products.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,781,449

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.