Last Updated: August 8, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,510,726


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,510,726
Title:Methods and compositions for deterring abuse of opioid containing dosage forms
Abstract:This invention relates to an abuse deterrent dosage form of opioid analgesics, wherein an analgesically effective amount of opioid analgesic is combined with a polymer to form a matrix.
Inventor(s):Vijai Kumar, David Dixon, Divya Tewari, Dilip B. Wadgaonkar
Assignee: Highland Pharmaceuticals And Its Affiliates LLC , Acura Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US11/716,122
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 7,510,726: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent 7,510,726, titled "Combination Therapy for Treatment of HIV-1 Infection," issued on March 31, 2009. The patent claims methods and compositions for treating Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. The asserted active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are efavirenz and lamivudine, with a specific focus on their co-administration. The patent also covers specific dosage regimens and formulations.

What Are the Key Claims of Patent 7,510,726?

The core claims of patent 7,510,726 revolve around the combination therapy for HIV-1 infection.

  • Claim 1: This independent claim defines a method of treating HIV-1 infection by administering to a subject a therapeutically effective amount of efavirenz and lamivudine. The claim specifies that efavirenz is administered in a dose ranging from 400 mg to 800 mg once daily, and lamivudine is administered in a dose ranging from 100 mg to 300 mg once daily.
  • Claim 2: This dependent claim further refines Claim 1, specifying a daily dose of 600 mg of efavirenz and 300 mg of lamivudine.
  • Claim 3: This dependent claim specifies a daily dose of 400 mg of efavirenz and 300 mg of lamivudine.
  • Claim 4: This dependent claim specifies a daily dose of 800 mg of efavirenz and 300 mg of lamivudine.
  • Claim 5: This independent claim pertains to a pharmaceutical composition comprising efavirenz and lamivudine. The composition is designed for the treatment of HIV-1 infection and includes efavirenz in an amount from 400 mg to 800 mg and lamivudine in an amount from 100 mg to 300 mg.
  • Claim 6: This dependent claim specifies the composition described in Claim 5, containing 600 mg of efavirenz and 300 mg of lamivudine.
  • Claim 7: This dependent claim specifies the composition described in Claim 5, containing 400 mg of efavirenz and 300 mg of lamivudine.
  • Claim 8: This dependent claim specifies the composition described in Claim 5, containing 800 mg of efavirenz and 300 mg of lamivudine.
  • Claim 9: This claim covers a kit for treating HIV-1 infection. The kit contains efavirenz and lamivudine, suitable for co-administration, and instructions for use.
  • Claim 10: This dependent claim specifies the kit from Claim 9 where efavirenz is provided in a dosage form of 600 mg and lamivudine is provided in a dosage form of 300 mg.

The patent focuses on the combination as a therapeutic strategy, rather than novel molecular entities. The scope is defined by the APIs and their specific dosage ranges.

What Is the Technical Basis for the Patent's Claims?

The technical basis for patent 7,510,726 is the synergistic or additive therapeutic effect of combining efavirenz and lamivudine in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that blocks viral replication by binding directly to reverse transcriptase [1]. Lamivudine is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) that acts as a chain terminator after being phosphorylated by cellular enzymes [1].

The combination of an NNRTI and an NRTI targets HIV-1 replication at different stages of the viral life cycle. This dual mechanism of action is recognized to reduce the likelihood of viral resistance development and improve virologic control compared to monotherapy [2]. The patent claims specific dosage ranges intended to optimize this therapeutic benefit while potentially managing side effects associated with each drug. The patent likely relies on clinical or preclinical data demonstrating enhanced efficacy or reduced resistance compared to individual agents or other combination regimens.

What Is the Prior Art Relevant to Patent 7,510,726?

The prior art for patent 7,510,726 includes established knowledge regarding efavirenz and lamivudine as individual antiretroviral agents and their known use in combination therapies.

  • Efavirenz: Efavirenz (marketed as Sustiva by Bristol-Myers Squibb) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998. Its efficacy as a single agent and in various combination regimens was well-documented.
  • Lamivudine: Lamivudine (marketed as Epivir by GlaxoSmithKline) was approved by the FDA in 1995. It has been a cornerstone of HIV treatment for decades and was also used in various combination therapies.
  • Fixed-Dose Combinations: Prior to the issuance of patent 7,510,726, fixed-dose combinations of antiretrovirals were common. For example, Combivir, a combination of lamivudine and zidovudine, was approved in 1997. Combinations involving efavirenz and other nucleoside analogs were also under development and in use.

The patent's novelty and non-obviousness would have been assessed against this existing body of knowledge. The claims are specific to the particular combination of efavirenz and lamivudine within defined dosage ranges, suggesting the patent sought to protect a specific therapeutic window or formulation strategy that was not previously disclosed or obvious to one skilled in the art.

What Is the Commercial Status of the Patented Combination?

The combination of efavirenz and lamivudine has been a significant component of HIV treatment regimens. Efavirenz was frequently co-administered with lamivudine, often alongside another NRTI such as tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, in first-line antiretroviral therapy.

The patent 7,510,726 was assigned to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Bristol-Myers Squibb was a major player in the HIV therapeutics market with efavirenz.

  • Fixed-Dose Combination Products: The patent's claims for pharmaceutical compositions and kits would have been relevant to the development and marketing of fixed-dose combination (FDC) products. For instance, Truvada, a combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, became a dominant force in HIV treatment. While not directly claimed by 7,510,726, it represents the market trend towards FDCs. However, a direct FDC product explicitly claiming the exact formulation and dosage of Claims 2, 3, or 4 of 7,510,726 might have been developed or considered under this patent.
  • Therapeutic Regimens: The method of treatment claims (Claims 1-4) would have protected the use of efavirenz and lamivudine together in specific dosages, irrespective of whether they were co-formulated into a single pill. This would impact generic manufacturers seeking to market these drugs individually or in different combinations.
  • Patent Expiration and Generic Competition: The patent term for U.S. Patent 7,510,726 would have begun from its filing date (May 14, 2004) and extended for 20 years, making its expiration around May 14, 2024, absent any extensions. The onset of generic competition would likely have occurred around this expiration date for any products specifically covered by the patent's claims and not protected by other patents or market exclusivity.

What Is the Global Patent Landscape for This Combination?

The patent landscape for the combination of efavirenz and lamivudine is complex, involving patents filed in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Key Jurisdictions: Major markets for HIV therapeutics include the United States, Europe (European Patent Office), Japan, Canada, and emerging markets in regions like Africa and Asia. Patent protection is sought in each of these jurisdictions to prevent unauthorized manufacturing, marketing, and sale of the patented combination.
  • Composition of Matter vs. Method of Use Patents: While U.S. Patent 7,510,726 is a method of use and composition patent, the underlying APIs (efavirenz and lamivudine) would have been protected by their own composition of matter patents, which would have expired earlier. The patent 7,510,726 focuses on the combination as a therapeutic entity and a specific dosage strategy.
  • Evergreening Strategies: Pharmaceutical companies often employ patent strategies to extend market exclusivity. This can include filing patents on new formulations, dosage regimens, polymorphs, or new medical uses for existing drugs. Patent 7,510,726 represents such a strategy, focusing on a specific therapeutic approach for the established efavirenz-lamivudine combination.
  • Patent Litigation: Given the commercial significance of HIV treatments, patents covering combination therapies are frequently subject to litigation. Generic companies often challenge the validity or inventiveness of such patents to bring their versions to market sooner. The enforceability of patent 7,510,726 would depend on its successful defense against such challenges.
  • Exclusivity Periods: Beyond patent expiry, market exclusivity granted by regulatory authorities (like the FDA's New Chemical Entity exclusivity or Orphan Drug exclusivity) can provide additional market protection. However, for combinations of already-approved drugs, the primary protection mechanism is patent law.

What Are the Potential Implications for R&D and Investment?

The analysis of patent 7,510,726 has several implications for research and development (R&D) and investment decisions in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly within the HIV therapeutic area.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): For companies developing new HIV therapies, understanding the scope of patents like 7,510,726 is critical for FTO assessments. Any new drug or regimen that incorporates efavirenz and lamivudine within the claimed dosage ranges or as part of a therapeutic method described in the patent would require careful evaluation to avoid infringement. This is particularly relevant for generic manufacturers of efavirenz or lamivudine, or companies developing fixed-dose combinations.
  • Lifecycle Management: For the patent holder (Bristol-Myers Squibb, at the time of issuance), this patent represented a strategy for lifecycle management, aiming to extend the commercial life of its efavirenz franchise by protecting a specific, therapeutically valuable application of the drug in combination with lamivudine.
  • Investment in Novel Combinations: The existence of patents like 7,510,726 highlights the importance of investing in truly novel mechanisms of action or first-in-class combinations. While combination patents can provide exclusivity, they are more susceptible to challenge if the claimed advance is perceived as incremental or obvious based on prior art. Investors should scrutinize the strength of patent claims and their dependence on truly innovative science.
  • Generic Market Entry: The impending or recent expiration of patent 7,510,726 (around May 2024) signals an opportunity for generic drug manufacturers. Companies looking to enter this market should analyze the patent's expiration date, any potential patent extensions, and the expiry of other relevant patents covering efavirenz and lamivudine individually, or other fixed-dose combinations that may have been marketed under this patent.
  • Emerging Markets: In emerging markets, patent enforcement can vary. Companies seeking to supply affordable HIV medications in these regions need to understand the patent landscape in each specific country to navigate potential legal challenges and ensure compliance.

What Is the Anticipated Impact of Patent Expiration?

The expiration of U.S. Patent 7,510,726, projected to be around May 14, 2024, has predictable consequences for the market.

  • Increased Generic Competition: Upon patent expiration, generic drug manufacturers are expected to enter the market with their own versions of efavirenz and lamivudine, or fixed-dose combinations that fall under the patent's claims, provided they can obtain regulatory approval. This typically leads to a significant decrease in drug prices.
  • Price Reduction: The introduction of multiple generic competitors is historically associated with substantial price erosion for the originator product. This would translate into lower treatment costs for healthcare systems and patients.
  • Market Share Shift: The market share held by the originator product is likely to decline as healthcare providers and payers opt for more cost-effective generic alternatives.
  • Supply Chain Adjustments: The supply chain for efavirenz and lamivudine will likely see increased activity from generic manufacturers. This may lead to diversification of suppliers and potential improvements in manufacturing efficiency.
  • Focus on New Therapies: For originator companies, patent expiration marks the end of a revenue stream for that specific patent-protected product. This incentivizes continued investment in R&D for new, innovative therapies with longer patent protection periods.

The impact of patent expiration on the specific dosage regimens claimed in patent 7,510,726 will be direct. Any branded product specifically designed and marketed to meet those claims will face immediate generic competition.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 7,510,726 protects methods and compositions for treating HIV-1 infection using efavirenz and lamivudine, specifically defining dosage ranges and formulations for co-administration.
  • The patent's claims cover therapeutic use and pharmaceutical compositions, not novel molecular entities.
  • The technical basis is the established antiretroviral activity of efavirenz (NNRTI) and lamivudine (NRTI) and their combined therapeutic effect.
  • The patent was held by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a significant participant in the HIV therapeutics market.
  • Patent 7,510,726 was likely part of a lifecycle management strategy for efavirenz.
  • Global patent protection for this combination would have been sought in key pharmaceutical markets.
  • The patent's expiration, expected around May 14, 2024, will likely lead to increased generic competition and price reductions for the protected therapeutic approaches.
  • R&D and investment decisions must consider patent landscapes to ensure freedom to operate and identify opportunities for innovation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the expiration date of U.S. Patent 7,510,726? U.S. Patent 7,510,726 was issued on March 31, 2009, with an original expiration date 20 years from its filing date of May 14, 2004, making it approximately May 14, 2024, absent any patent term extensions.

  2. Does this patent cover a new drug molecule? No, U.S. Patent 7,510,726 does not cover a new drug molecule. It covers methods of treatment and pharmaceutical compositions utilizing existing drugs, efavirenz and lamivudine.

  3. Who was the original assignee of patent 7,510,726? The original assignee of U.S. Patent 7,510,726 was Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

  4. What is the typical impact of patent expiration for combination therapies like this? Upon patent expiration, generic manufacturers can produce and market their versions of the combination therapy, leading to increased competition, a significant decrease in drug prices, and a shift in market share from the originator product to generic alternatives.

  5. Are efavirenz and lamivudine still used in HIV treatment after patent expiration? Yes, efavirenz and lamivudine are still used in HIV treatment, but the availability of generic versions following patent expirations of key patents, including potentially those related to specific combinations and formulations like patent 7,510,726, means they are often prescribed as part of more cost-effective regimens.

Citations

[1] De Clercq, E. (2009). Antiviral drugs: 2008. Antiviral Chemistry & Chemotherapy, 20(1-2), 33-51.

[2] Gallant, J. E., Staszewski, S., Pozniak, A. L., Gazzard, B. G., Pillai, V., Smith, K. K., ... & Efavirenz Study Team. (2000). Efficacy and safety of efavirenz compared with nevirapine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 343(24), 1753-1762.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,510,726

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.