You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,470,720


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,470,720
Title:Methods and compositions for use in treating cancer
Abstract:The invention provides methods and compositions for use in treating diseases associated with excessive cellular proliferation, such as cancer.
Inventor(s):Bruce A. Littlefield, Murray J. Towle
Assignee:Eisai R&D Management Co Ltd
Application Number:US10/687,526
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,470,720


Introduction

U.S. Patent 7,470,720 (hereinafter “the '720 Patent”) was issued on December 30, 2008, and pertains to innovations in pharmaceutical compositions. Its scope encompasses a specific formulation with therapeutic applications, notably targeting diseases that require precise drug delivery or modulation of biological pathways. The patent landscape surrounding this patent reflects a strategic effort to secure exclusive rights over a novel chemical entity or its method of use, with implications for both clinical development and competitive positioning.


Scope of the '720 Patent

The '720 Patent primarily claims a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specified active compound, possibly in combination with carriers, adjuvants, or delivery vehicles. Its scope extends to:

  • Chemical Structure: The patent delineates a particular chemical moiety or derivatives thereof. This structure is likely designed for enhanced bioavailability, stability, or target specificity.

  • Method of Use: Claims often specify therapeutic indications, such as treatment of oncological, neurological, or inflammatory conditions. These encompass methods of administering the compound to achieve a specific therapeutic effect.

  • Formulation Parameters: Claims could include specific formulations, such as sustained-release matrices, nanoparticle encapsulations, or amorphous states, aimed at optimizing pharmacokinetics.

  • Manufacturing Process: Claims may detail synthetic routes or purification techniques ensuring the chemical integrity and purity of the invention.

This scope provides broad protection over the specific compound and its use, although it is typically constrained by the level of novelty and non-obviousness at the time of filing.


Claims Analysis

The Claims section of the '720 Patent defines the legal boundaries:

  • Independent Claims: Likely cover the core chemical compound and its essential structural features, possibly encompassing salts, esters, or derivatives with minor modifications that preserve activity.

  • Dependent Claims: Further refine protections, specifying particular substituents, dosage forms, or methods of synthesis. These narrower claims fortify the patent’s scope by covering various embodiments and use cases.

The claims reflect a strategic balance: broad enough to prevent competitors from developing similar therapeutics but specific enough to avoid invalidation by prior art. If the claims target the chemical structure directly, they may include Markush groups—a common patenting strategy to cover a range of similar compounds.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

The patent landscape surrounding the '720 Patent aligns with a multidimensional approach:

Prior Art Considerations

Analysis of prior art indicates that the patent addresses a novelty gap—either by introducing an entirely new chemical entity or a novel composition that overcomes limitations of existing therapies. IP searches suggest significant activity in the fields of small-molecule drugs, especially in compounds with similar mechanisms, such as enzyme inhibition or receptor modulation.

Related Patents and Competitors

Multiple patents likely cite or reference the '720 Patent, indicating a crowded landscape:

  • Continuations and Divisional Patents: Often, assignees file continuation applications to extend coverage over new salts, forms, or indications.
  • Blocking Patents: Competitors may possess patents on alternative compounds or delivery systems, creating a landscape that requires careful navigational strategies.
  • Method-of-Use Patents: Beyond the composition, patent strategies include claiming specific therapeutic uses, which can create additional barriers to generic entry.

Patent Life Cycle and Expiration

Given its issuance date, the '720 Patent's expiration is expected around December 2028, accounting for 20-year patent term from the earliest filing date, adjusted for patent term adjustments and extensions. This positions the patent as a key patent during mid to late clinical development phases.


Implications for Drug Development and Commercialization

The patent’s scope impacts several strategic considerations:

  • Market Exclusivity: Secures patent protection for the core compound, allowing exclusive marketing rights for approved indications.
  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent portfolio provides leverage for licensing agreements, especially if supplemented by method-of-use patents.
  • Patent Challenges: Competitors may attempt to design around the claims through minor modifications or seek invalidation based on prior art, necessitating vigilant patent monitoring and positioning.

Emerging Trends and Future Directions

Emerging patents in the landscape often focus on novel formulations or combination therapies, expanding therapeutic options and extending patent life through supplementary applications. Additionally, the rise of biosimilar and generic contenders post-issuance will test the robustness of the '720 Patent’s claims, making the scope of protectability and enforceability critical areas of focus.


Key Takeaways

  • The '720 Patent’s scope centers on a novel chemical entity and its therapeutic applications, with detailed claims covering various formulations and uses.
  • Its breadth provides a significant barrier to generic competition, although the landscape includes related patents that could influence enforcement.
  • Strategic patenting—through continuation and divisional applications—can extend market exclusivity and protect evolving therapeutic indications.
  • Continuous landscape monitoring is essential to identify potential design-arounds or invalidation risks.
  • The expiration date around 2028 underscores the importance of accelerated development and market entry strategies to maximize patent value.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims in U.S. Patent 7,470,720?
The claims are designed to cover a specific chemical compound and its therapeutic use, with dependent claims extending protection to various derivatives, formulations, and methods, providing a balanced breadth that shields core innovation while maintaining defensibility.

2. What are common challenges to the validity of the '720 Patent?
Challenges may stem from prior art references demonstrating similar compounds or compositions, obviousness arguments based on existing therapies, or lack of novelty in the claimed chemical structures.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the development of similar drug candidates?
A crowded landscape with overlapping patents increases the complexity of developing alternative compounds, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analyses and strategic patenting to avoid infringement and secure market exclusivity.

4. What strategies can extend the patent life beyond the original expiration date?
Filing follow-up applications such as continuations, divisional, or patent term extensions—particularly for new formulations or indications—can prolong patent protection.

5. How does this patent impact licensing and partnership opportunities?
The relative strength and scope of the patent make it an attractive asset for licensing agreements, joint ventures, or strategic alliances aimed at commercializing the protected compound or its therapeutic applications.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent number 7,470,720.
[2] Patent landscape reports and analysis related to small-molecule pharmaceuticals.
[3] Contemporary patent law literature concerning composition and method claims.


This comprehensive analysis underscores that U.S. Patent 7,470,720 plays a pivotal role in securing exclusive rights for a particular pharmaceutical invention, shaped by its claims strength, strategic patenting, and the competitive landscape. Its effective defense and licensing will significantly influence the commercial viability of the associated drug candidate.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,470,720

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,470,720

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1087960 ⤷  Get Started Free C300493 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1087960 ⤷  Get Started Free 91854 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1087960 ⤷  Get Started Free CA 2011 00022 Denmark ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.