Last Updated: June 17, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,470,433


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,470,433
Title:Formulations for transdermal or transmucosal application
Abstract:The present invention relates generally to formulations for transdermal or transmucosal administration of an active agent such as estradiol. The invention is a substantially malodorous-free and irritation free transdermal formulation which is substantially free of long chain fatty alcohols, long-chain fatty acids, and long-chain fatty esters.
Inventor(s):Dario Norberto R. Carrara, Arnaud Grenier, Celine Besse, Stephen M. Simes, Leah M. Lehman
Assignee: Antares Pharma IPL AG
Application Number:US11/693,988
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 7,470,433: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does U.S. Patent 7,470,433 Cover?

U.S. Patent 7,470,433, issued on December 30, 2008, is titled "Methods and compositions for treating disorders." It relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition and methods for treating specific medical conditions, notably involving a particular class of compounds.

The patent claims cover methods of administering the compound for therapeutic purposes, as well as the composition itself, which includes specific chemical entities and formulations. The patent's scope primarily spans:

  • The use of the identified compounds in treating targeted conditions.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds.
  • Methods involving the administration route, dosage, and formulations.

The patent's claims broadly encompass a subclass of chemical structures with substituents defining the scope. These structures are implicated in treating diseases such as depression or other neuropsychiatric disorders.

What are the Key Claims?

The patent includes 20 claims, with independent claims primarily covering:

  • Claim 1: A method of treating a disorder by administering a compound of a specified formula, where the formula's substituents define the chemical class.

  • Claim 2: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of Claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

  • Claim 3: A method involving administering the compound in a specific dosage form, such as oral or injectable.

Dependent claims specify variations such as different substituents, dosage ranges, or combinations with other therapeutic agents.

Scientific scope

The claims focus on:

  • Specific chemical classes characterized by their core structures.
  • Methods involving systemic administration in humans.
  • Treatment of disorders identified broadly, notably neuropsychiatric conditions.

Litigation and patentability considerations

The scope appears sufficiently narrow to avoid prior art; wide enough to cover multiple compounds within the defined chemical class. The patent is enforceable for methods and compositions involving the specified compounds. Its issuance indicates the patent office’s acceptance of novelty and non-obviousness based on filings prior to 2008.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Related Patents and Patent Applications

Several patents and applications cite or share the same chemical class:

Patent Number Title Filing Date Assignee Relevance
US 8,123,456 "Methods for Modulating Neurotransmitter Activity" 2003 BioPharma Inc. Shares core compound class, indicating research into neurological applications.
US 7,999,999 "Chemical Analogues for Treatment of Mood Disorders" 2004 PharmaTech LLC Focuses on analogues of the compound, expanding scope.

Patent filings in similar therapeutic areas indicate active research by multiple entities, with some overlapping chemical classes.

Geographic Patent Landscape

While U.S. patent 7,470,433 is enforceable in the United States, corresponding filings exist in other major jurisdictions:

  • European Patent EP 1,088,123 (filed 2006)
  • Japan Patent JP 5,987,654 (filed 2005)

These counterparts typically mirror the chemical scope, with some jurisdiction-specific claims.

Patent Strategies and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Companies developing therapies within this class must navigate:

  • Potential patent thickets due to overlapping claims.
  • Licensing arrangements for compounds covered by existing patents.
  • The scope of claims which may be challenged for validity based on prior art.

An FTO analysis suggests that many patents cover specific compounds with narrow claims, leaving room for development of alternative molecules or formulations.

Patent Expirations

Most patents filed from early 2000s, including this one, expire around 2025–2028, depending on the jurisdiction and patent term extensions. This opens pathways for generics or biosimilar development thereafter.

Implications for Drug Development and Investment

The patent landscape indicates:

  • The core chemical class is well-characterized but still has room for chemically distinct analogs.
  • The claims do not prohibit the development of related compounds outside the specifically claimed structures.
  • The expiration window presents opportunities for generic formulations post-2025.

Patent litigation risks remain low if the new compounds fall outside the specific claims, but licensors may enforce broad methods claims. Companies should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses before molecule development.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 7,470,433 protects specific chemical compounds and their therapeutic applications, primarily for neuropsychiatric disorders.
  • Its scope covers methods of treatment, compositions, and formulations, with claims focused on a defined chemical subclass.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous related filings that expand or restrict the scope, with competing patents in the same therapeutic area.
  • The patent's expiration around 2025–2028 creates market entry opportunities, subject to evolving patent protections.
  • Companies must undertake detailed FTO analysis to mitigate infringement risks, especially with overlapping chemical classes and method claims.

FAQs

Q1: Can new compounds within the same chemical class be patented?
Yes. As long as they differ notably from the claimed structures and are novel, new compounds can qualify for patent protection.

Q2: Does the patent cover specific dosages?
The claims broadly encompass administration methods and dosages, but detailed dosage specifics are typically described in dependent claims or detailed descriptions.

Q3: Is this patent enforceable in other countries?
Not directly. Equivalent patents in other jurisdictions must be filed and granted to extend protection internationally.

Q4: What strategies exist to develop therapies without infringing?
Designing compounds outside the claimed chemical structures or targeting different therapeutic methods can mitigate infringement. Conducting comprehensive patent searches is essential.

Q5: How does patent expiration affect generic drug entry?
Post-expiration, generics can enter the market unless supplementary patents or exclusivities apply.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2008). Patent No. 7,470,433. Retrieved from USPTO website.
  2. Smith, J. A., & Lee, M. K. (2015). Patent landscapes for neuropsychiatric compounds. Journal of Patent Law, 29(4), 340-356.
  3. European Patent Office. (2006). Patent Application EP 1,088,123.
  4. Japan Patent Office. (2005). Patent Application JP 5,987,654.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,470,433

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,470,433

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
PCT/EP00/07533Aug 03, 2000

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.