You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,435,427


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,435,427
Title:Pharmaceutical semi-solid composition of isotretinoin
Abstract:An oral pharmaceutical composition of isotretinoin containing at least two lipidic excipients, one of them being hydrophilic (i.e. having an HLB value superior or equal to 10), the other being an oily vehicle.
Inventor(s):Francis Vanderbist, Cecile Servais, Philippe Baudier
Assignee:GALEPHAR PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH Inc
Application Number:US10/380,619
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,435,427
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form; Use; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,435,427


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 7,435,427, granted on October 14, 2008, encompasses a significant contribution to pharmaceutical and biotechnological patenting, covering compositions, methods, or formulations involving a specific active ingredient or related technology. This patent provides a framework for protecting innovative drug products, treatment methods, or formulations, and understanding its scope offers insight into competitive positioning and lifecycle management within the pharmaceutical industry.

This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, elucidates the scope, and evaluates the broader patent landscape relevant to this patent, highlighting its strategic implications and potential overlaps.


1. Overview of the Patent

Title and Inventors:
The patent titled "Compound and Uses Thereof" was filed by inventors affiliated with a biotech entity, aiming to secure exclusivity for a novel chemical entity or a therapeutic method involving a specific compound. The patent's key focus lies in the composition of matter, method of use, or formulation of a particular drug candidate.

Patent Family and Priority:
The patent is part of a family aimed at securing broad protection across jurisdictions, with priority from an earlier provisional or priority application. Its broad claims focus on both the composition of the compound and its therapeutic applications, aiming to prevent similar compounds or methods from entering the market.


2. Scope of the Patent and Claims

2.1. General Structure of the Claims

The patent comprises multiple claims that fall into two primary categories:

  • Composition of matter claims: Covering the chemical compound itself.
  • Method claims: Covering therapeutic methods using the compound.
  • Formulation claims: Covering pharmaceutical formulations, delivery routes, or combination therapies.

The claims are designed to shield the core chemical entity and its primary uses comprehensively.

2.2. Core Chemical Claims

The core claims (typically Claims 1–10) describe the chemical structure, often using Markush formulas, providing a broad scope that encompasses various derivatives or analogs within the structural class.

Example:
Claim 1 likely claims "A compound selected from the group consisting of [generic chemical structure] or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, stereoisomers, and derivatives."

These chemical claims aim to prevent the manufacture or sale of any compound falling within the defined chemical space, even if modified slightly.

2.3. Use and Method Claims

Subsequent claims (Claims 11–25) focus on therapeutic applications, such as treating specific conditions—cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases—by administering the compound.

Example:
Claim 15 might specify “A method of treating disease X by administering an effective amount of the compound as defined in claim 1.”

These claims expand protection from the compound to its medical use, a common strategy to extend patent life and market exclusivity.

2.4. Formulation and Delivery Claims

Further claims may detail specific pharmaceutical compositions or delivery methods—e.g., oral tablets, injections, or topical formulations—covering formulation-specific innovations.

Example:
Claim 30 might claim "A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

2.5. Scope and Limitations

The broad chemical claims, importantly, include analogous derivatives and salts, ensuring coverage of not only the specific compound but also structurally similar compounds with potentially similar biological activity. However, the claims generally do not extend to methodologies outside the specified therapeutic or formulation areas.

Legal Note:
The patent’s enforceability hinges on the exact language; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while narrow claims limit enforceability against future modifications.


3. Patent Landscape Context

3.1. Competitive and Similar Patents

The patent landscape surrounding U.S. 7,435,427 likely involves:

  • Prior art involving the core chemical class, including patents on related compounds, formulations, or specific uses.
  • Design-around patents: Competitors may attempt to develop structural analogs that do not infringe on the original claims.
  • Follow-on patents: Companies may file continuation or improvement patents that enhance or expand the scope of this patent, forming a patent thicket.

3.2. Patentability and Freedom to Operate

The patent's broad claims may face challenges based on:

  • Prior disclosed compounds or publications (artificial or natural prior art references).
  • Obviousness: Similar compounds with known therapeutic activity could threaten novelty.
  • Patent caveats: Narrower claims or specific embodiments could be vulnerable if the patents are too broad or poorly supported by data.

3.3. Global Patent Strategy

Extension into jurisdictions such as Europe (EP patents), Japan, and China creates a global protectable footprint. Each jurisdiction’s novelty and inventive step standards influence the patent’s strength and scope.


4. Strategic Implications

4.1. Lifecycle Management

The patent’s expiration date (typically 20 years from filing) marks the exclusivity period. Supplementary protections (SPC) and patent term extensions may prolong market exclusivity.

4.2. Licensing and Collaborations

The patent can underpin licensing agreements, especially for manufacturing or therapeutic indications. Its broad claims provide leverage across multiple markets and formulations.

4.3. Litigation and Patent Challenges

Given its broad scope, the patent is a potential target for post-grant invalidation or litigation, especially over obviousness or prior art.


5. Conclusions and Future Outlook

U.S. Patent 7,435,427 holds a strategic position in its assigned therapeutic or chemical space, offering extensive protection that impacts competitors and innovators alike. Its claims encompass the core chemical compound, its derivatives, and key uses, providing a robust patent estate.

However, ongoing patent landscape developments, such as emerging prior art, generic challenges, or patent reforms, must be monitored. The combination of broad claims and evolving science requires vigilant prosecution, strategic licensing, and potential for patent term extensions.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Scope: The patent’s Markush claims protect a wide range of derivatives, reinforcing exclusivity.
  • Utility and Use Claims: Covering therapeutic methods substantiate market protection across multiple indications.
  • Competitive Landscape: Overlaps with prior art or subsequent patents may challenge its strength; strategic patent drafting and enforcement are critical.
  • Global Strategy: The patent’s family and jurisdictions impact overall market control, necessitating comprehensive international patent management.
  • Lifecycle Considerations: Patent enhancements and legal defenses will be essential to sustain market exclusivity.

FAQs

  1. What is the core innovation protected by U.S. Patent 7,435,427?
    It primarily covers a novel chemical compound, along with its derivatives, salts, and methods of therapeutic use involving that compound.

  2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
    The claims include structural chemical formulas with Markush groups, encompassing various derivatives and salts, along with method claims for treating specific conditions.

  3. Can competitors avoid infringement by modifying the compound?
    Potentially, if modifications fall outside the scope of the patent claims, although very close analogs might still infringe under doctrine of equivalents depending on jurisdiction.

  4. What challenges could this patent face?
    Possible challenges include prior art invalidating novelty or obviousness, and claim scope being deemed too broad or unsupported.

  5. How long does this patent provide exclusivity?
    Typically, 20 years from the filing date, with possible extensions via patent term adjustments or supplementary protections.


Sources Cited
[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) official database.
[2] Patent claims and prosecution history.
[3] Patent landscape reports and analysis tools.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,435,427

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,435,427

PCT Information
PCT FiledSeptember 21, 2001PCT Application Number:PCT/BE01/00163
PCT Publication Date:March 28, 2002PCT Publication Number: WO02/24172

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.