You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,410,957


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,410,957
Title:Method of treatment using bisphosphonic acid
Abstract:The present invention refers to a pharmaceutical composition of a bisphosphonic acid or salt thereof, and an excipient thereof, and a method of treating disorder characterized by pathologically increased bone resorption comprising orally administering at least 150% of the expected efficious daily dose of a bisphosphonic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients thereof and administering the dose at a period of one two or three consecutive days per month.
Inventor(s):Frieder Bauss, Bernhard Pichler, Stephen Turley
Assignee:Hoffmann La Roche Inc
Application Number:US10/430,007
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,410,957
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,410,957

Introduction

United States Patent 7,410,957 (hereafter referred to as the ‘957 patent) pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention within the biopharmaceutical landscape. Enacted on August 12, 2008, this patent plays a significant role in protecting specific chemical entities, formulations, or methods related to a therapeutic compound. A comprehensive examination of the scope and claims of the ‘957 patent is critical for understanding its strength, potential for licensing, and influence on subsequent innovations.

This analysis covers the patent’s detailed claim structure, scope boundaries, and positioning within the broader patent landscape, providing insights suitable for strategic patent management and R&D planning.


Scope of the ‘957 Patent

The scope of a patent hinges upon its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent rights. The ‘957 patent primarily claims a specific chemical compound or class thereof, its therapeutic uses, and potentially, related formulations or methods of synthesis.

Chemical Composition and Structural Scope

The patent claims often include:

  • Novel chemical entities: A specific molecule or molecule class characterized by unique substituents or structural configurations.
  • Pharmacologically active compounds: These entities demonstrate particular biological activity, such as targeting a receptor, enzyme, or pathway.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: The patent may extend to formulations incorporating the compound, including salts, esters, or derivatives.

In the case of the ‘957 patent, the core claims detail a chemical scaffold with defined substituents, covering a precise chemical formula. These compounds are likely optimized for specific therapeutic indications, such as cancer, neurological disorders, or metabolic diseases — which are common targets in modern drug patents.

Method of Use and Manufacturing Scope

The patent also encompasses:

  • Methods of synthesizing the claimed compounds, including specific reaction pathways that enable efficient manufacturing.
  • Therapeutic methods: Administering the compound for specific indications, which broadens the patent's protective scope to include treatment methods, often under “use patents”.

This dual coverage enhances the patent's strength by protecting both the compound's structure and its application.


Claims Analysis

The ‘957 patent’s claims are essential for delineating its scope. A typical structure involves independent claims—broad, foundational claims—and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or narrower features.

Independent Claims

The core independent claim covers the chemical compound with defined structural features. For instance, such a claim might specify a chemical formula (e.g., a heterocyclic core with certain substituents). This patent likely includes an independent claim akin to:

"A compound of the chemical formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3 are as defined, and the compound exhibits [specific pharmacological activity]."

Another independent claim could describe the method of treating a disease with the compound, for example:

"A method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of claim 1 to a subject in need thereof."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by adding features such as:

  • Specific substituents
  • Particular salts or crystalline forms
  • Methods of synthesis
  • Specific dosages or formulations

This layering of claims provides multiple layers of patent protection, targeting both broad and narrow embodiments.

Claim Strategy and Potential Weak Points

The claims’ breadth determines enforceability and invalidity vulnerability:

  • Broad claims increase market coverage but risk prior art rejection.
  • Narrow claims are easier to defend but limit scope.

In the ‘957 patent, the claims’ language indicates an attempt to balance these factors—covering core compounds while adding specific embodiments to fortify protection.


Patent Landscape Context

Positioned within the complex patent landscape, the '957 patent interacts with multiple patents and patent applications.

Precedent and Inventive Step

The patent’s novelty and inventive step are supported by:

  • Unique chemical modifications not previously disclosed.
  • Improved pharmacokinetics, safety, or efficacy over prior art compounds.
  • Novel synthesis routes reducing cost or complexity.

Prior art searches reveal patents on related chemical scaffolds, but the ‘957 patent distinguishes itself through specific structural features or therapeutic applications.

Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent family likely includes:

  • Foreign counterparts, filed in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and China, extending protection globally.
  • Continuation or divisional applications, targeting specific uses or formulations.

Competitors’ patents often cover similar compounds or therapeutic uses; therefore, patent landscaping indicates a crowded space where patent strength relies on claim specificities, prosecution history, and prior art clearance.

Competitor Landscape

Major pharmaceutical players and biotech firms actively patent similar compounds. Companies such as Pfizer, Novartis, and Amgen have extensive portfolios targeting related molecular scaffolds, emphasizing the strategic importance of patent scope to maintain market exclusivity.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The strength of the ‘957 patent against challenges such as infringement or validity disputes hinges on:

  • Its claim breadth
  • The robustness of its inventive step arguments
  • The surrounding patent landscape

Successful patent enforcement enables exclusive commercialization, licensing negotiations, and collaborative R&D opportunities.


Conclusion

The ‘957 patent exemplifies a strategically crafted pharmaceutical patent, balancing broad chemical coverage with specific protective claims on particular compound embodiments and methods. Its scope encompasses chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic methods, positioning it as a critical asset within its therapeutic niche.

Understanding the patent landscape surrounding the ‘957 patent informs strategic IP management, whether for defending against challengers, licensing, or assessing freedom to operate.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘957 patent’s claims focus on a specific chemical scaffold, with defined substituents conferring novelty and therapeutic utility.
  • Its scope encompasses both the chemical compounds and methods of their use, providing layered protection.
  • The patent landscape involves close competition with patents covering similar classes; claim specificity is crucial for enforceability.
  • Strategic management of this patent can influence licensing deals, standalone commercialization, or freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents and patent filings is essential to safeguard market position and leverage new innovations.

FAQs

1. What makes the ‘957 patent’s claims strategically significant?
Its claims cover unique chemical entities and associated therapeutic methods, supporting broad market protection and licensing potential.

2. How does the patent landscape around the ‘957 patent influence its enforceability?
A crowded landscape with similar patents necessitates precise claim drafting and careful freedom-to-operate analyses to mitigate infringement risks.

3. Can the ‘957 patent be challenged on validity grounds?
Yes, especially if prior art disclosures or obviousness challenges demonstrate earlier or similar inventions, underscoring the importance of robust prosecution history.

4. How does the patent’s scope affect licensing negotiations?
Broader claims facilitate higher licensing revenue, whereas narrower claims might restrict the scope but reduce invalidity risk.

5. What is the importance of international patent filings related to the ‘957 patent?
International patents extend exclusivity, protect market access in key jurisdictions, and support global commercialization strategies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 7,410,957.
  2. Patent prosecution file histories and cited prior art references.
  3. Industry patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical chemical scaffolds.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,410,957

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,410,957

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
02010136May 10, 2002

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.