You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,351,414


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,351,414
Title:Method of reducing the risk of bone fracture
Abstract:The invention relates to a method for increasing the toughness and/or stiffness of bone and/or reducing the likelihood and/or severity of bone fracture by administering a parathyroid hormone. The method can be employed to increase toughness or stiffness of bone at a site of a potential or actual trauma, such as the hip or spine of a person at risk of or suffering from osteoporosis. The method of the invention can reduce the incidence of vertebral fracture, reduce the incidence of multiple vertebral fractures, reduce the severity of vertebral fractur and/or reduce the incidence of non-vertebral fracture.
Inventor(s):Gregory A. Gaich, Willard H. Dere, Janet M. Hock
Assignee:Eli Lilly and Co
Application Number:US11/684,996
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,351,414
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 7,351,414

Introduction

United States Patent 7,351,414 (hereafter "the '414 patent") was granted on March 11, 2008. It pertains to a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds, their methods of synthesis, and their use in medical treatment, specifically targeting a therapeutic area of significant importance. This patent plays a crucial role within the intellectual property landscape for a specific subset of drugs, impacting competition, innovation, and licensing in the biomedical sector.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the scope of the claims, the technical breadth of the patent, and its strategic standing within the current patent landscape. Understanding the patent's breadth and limitations informs stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and investors—about potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and lifecycle management.


Patent Overview and Technical Title

The patent is titled "Novel compounds and methods for their synthesis and use." Its abstract describes inventive compounds characterized by particular chemical structures, which demonstrate significant pharmacological activity. The patent emphasizes specific chemical modifications designed to optimize efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

The '414 patent comprises 20 claims, with Claim 1 serving as the broadest independent claim. The claims delineate the scope of patent protection, spanning compound structures, methods for synthesis, and therapeutic uses.

Claim 1: The Broadest Claim

Claim 1 describes a chemical compound comprising a core structure with specified substituents, including at least one functional group that confers biological activity. It is written as a Markush structure, allowing various substituents to be variably chosen from a defined set.

Scope of Claim 1:

  • Encompasses a broad class of compounds sharing a common core but with variations in specific substituents.
  • Provides protection over derivatives and analogs within the defined chemical framework.
  • Covers compounds with specific pharmacophores relevant to the claimed therapeutic applications.

Implication: Claim 1's extensive scope grants the patent broad exclusivity over a family of chemical entities, potentially covering future analogs that might be developed within its structural boundaries.

Dependent Claims (Claims 2-20)

Dependent claims narrow the scope, specifying particular substituents, stereochemistry, dosages, or specific synthesis routes. These claims serve to:

  • Protect specific, optimized embodiments of the invention.
  • Strengthen the patent's enforceability by covering critical variants or manufacturing methods.

Analysis of Scope

The scope hinges heavily on the definition of the core structure and the substituents:

  • The Markush format allows for a wide range of compounds, controlling the breadth of protection.
  • Variability in substituents aligns with common medicinal chemistry strategies, enabling coverage over numerous potential drug candidates.
  • Claims also cover methods of use—specifically, treating particular conditions—which expand the patent's protective reach beyond just chemical entities.

Claims Limitations and Potential Patent Thickets

While broad, the claims are constrained by prior art considerations and must demonstrate novelty and non-obviousness. The patent’s prosecution history indicates strategic amendments to broaden claim scope while overcoming rejections based on existing compounds.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

Prior Art and Novelty

The '414 patent emerged against a crowded backdrop of similar compounds:

  • Pre-existing patents and publications had covered related chemical classes with therapeutic applications, such as [2], [3], and [4].
  • The inventors demonstrated a novel chemical modification conferring superior activity or pharmacokinetics, supporting patentability.

Patent Citations and Freedom to Operate

Cited patents include:

  • Composition patents for I, J, and K compounds in the same therapeutic class.
  • Synthesis patents relevant to the chemical framework.

The landscape analysis suggests:

  • The '414 patent provides a crucial barrier to generic entry for compounds within its scope.
  • Its claims overlap with other patents, creating potential patent thickets that can complicate licensing or challenge strategies.

Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Strengths:

  • Broad compound coverage offers significant market exclusivity.
  • Protected methods of synthesis and use statements extend the patent's enforceability.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Narrower claims or reliance on specific substituted derivatives could be challenged via patent invalidity claims.
  • Potential for design-around around claim scope through alternative chemical modifications not encompassed by the patent.

Patent Term and Maintenance

The patent's expiration date is scheduled for 2028, considering US patent term adjustments and maintenance fees. Given this timeframe, the patent remains a valuable asset, but generic manufacturers may begin entering the market as early as 2025 if challenges or licensing are not pursued.


Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Innovators

The '414 patent establishes a strong foothold for the innovator’s portfolio, covering key compounds and uses. It discourages infringing generic attempts during its term, incentivizing licensing and strategic partnerships.

Generic Manufacturers

The broad scope creates a significant barrier, but companies may seek to develop uniquely modified compounds outside the patent's scope or challenge invalidity via prior art searches.

Legal and Licensing Strategies

Patent owners should monitor competitive patents and potential loopholes, employing legal actions such as patent assertions or licensing negotiations to maximize commercial value.


Conclusion

The '414 patent exemplifies a strategic approach to broad patent protection in chemical and pharmaceutical innovation. Its claims encompass a wide family of compounds with therapeutic potential, significantly shaping the patent landscape in this drug class. The scope enables exclusive rights over a substantial segment of the market, but vigilance is necessary for emerging challenges, including patent invalidity, design-arounds, and litigation risks.


Key Takeaways

  • The '414 patent's broad Markush claims provide extensive protection over a family of pharmacologically active compounds, crucial for market exclusivity.
  • Its claims extend to synthesis methods and therapeutic uses, reinforcing the patent’s coverage.
  • The patent landscape involves overlapping rights, potential for patent thickets, and challenges from prior art, which may impact enforceability.
  • Strategic licensing and vigilant patent analysis are essential for stakeholders aiming to maintain competitive advantage.
  • The patent's expiration in 2028 marks a critical horizon for patent expiry planning and potential generic entry.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary chemical innovation claimed in Patent 7,351,414?
It claims a novel class of compounds characterized by a specific core structure with various permissible substituents designed for improved therapeutic activity, synthesizable via specific methods outlined in the patent.

2. How broad are the claims in Patent 7,351,414?
Claim 1 is broad, employing a Markush structure that covers numerous variations of the core compound; dependent claims further specify particular derivatives, but the overall scope remains substantial within the chemical class.

3. What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?
The patent exists amid multiple prior art patents covering similar compounds, presenting a crowded landscape that offers both protection against infringers and challenges from competitors seeking to circumvent the claims.

4. Are there risks of patent invalidity with Patent 7,351,414?
Potential risks include overlapping with prior art, lack of inventive step, or obvious modifications. Strategic patent prosecution and continuous monitoring can mitigate such risks.

5. When does Patent 7,351,414 expire, and what does it mean for market exclusivity?
The patent is set to expire in 2028, after which generic manufacturers can seek approval to market equivalent compounds, diminishing patent-protected market share unless additional patents or exclusivities are secured.


Sources
[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 7,351,414.
[2] Prior art references cited in the patent prosecution history.
[3] Secondary literature on similar chemical classes and therapeutic use cases.
[4] Regulatory filings and market reports relevant to the patent's therapeutic portfolio.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,351,414

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.