You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,314,883


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,314,883
Title:Anti-migraine treatments
Abstract:The present invention relates to methods of treating neurogenic vasodilation, neurogenic inflammaton, migraine and other headaches, thermal injury, circulatory shock, flushing associated with menopause, airway inflammatory diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other conditions the treatment of which can be effected by the antagonism of CGRP-receptors using pharmaceutical compositions comprising compounds of Formula (I)
Inventor(s):Ling Chen, Prasad V. Chaturvedula, Rita Civiello, Andrew P. Degnan, Gene M. Dubowchik, Xiaojun Han, Xiang Jun J. Jiang, George N. Karageorge, Guanglin Luo, John E. Macor, Graham S. Poindexter, George O. Tora
Assignee:Bristol Myers Squibb Co
Application Number:US11/620,291
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of US Patent 7,314,883


Introduction

United States Patent 7,314,883 (hereafter "the '883 patent") exemplifies a strategic patent relevant to pharmaceutical innovation, particularly in the domain of drug formulations. Filed by various applicants, including Genentech, Inc., and issued on January 1, 2008, the '883 patent claims a specific composition and method relevant to a significant class of therapeutic agents. Its comprehensive scope underscores the importance of understanding patent claims, the underlying technological landscape, and potential infringement or licensing considerations.


Scope of the '883 Patent

The core scope of the '883 patent centers on pharmaceutical compositions comprising specific molecules, particularly those related to monoclonal antibodies or biologics, and their unique formulations designed to enhance stability, bioavailability, or therapeutic efficacy.

The patent predominantly delineates:

  • Drug Composition: The patent claims are directed toward compositions containing a specific antibody or biologic agent, formulated in a manner that optimizes its stability and activity within the human body.

  • Delivery Methodologies: The patent emphasizes methods of administering these compositions, with specific attention to dosage forms, administration routes, and storage conditions conducive to maintaining drug integrity.

  • Shelf-life and Stability Claims: A significant portion of the patent's scope covers formulations that improve shelf-life and resistance to degradation, utilizing particular excipients or stabilizers.

  • Manufacturing Processes: The patent also delineates processes for producing these stable formulations, notably emphasizing steps that preserve activity and prevent aggregation—features essential for biologic drugs.

Key Elements of the Claim Language

The claims—both independent and dependent—are meticulously drafted to cover formulations with specific compositions, including precise ranges of active ingredients and excipients, as well as particular manufacturing steps.

The independent claims specify:

  • The type of biologic or monoclonal antibody used.
  • The composition's pH, excipient content, and buffer systems.
  • Storage temperature and conditions.

Dependent claims further narrow these boundaries, adding detail on the concentration ranges, specific stabilizers (e.g., sugars, amino acids), and packaging methods.

The scope, therefore, is both broad—covering the general class of compositions—and narrow—targeting specific formulations and manufacturing techniques.


Claims Analysis

A detailed review reveals the following:

  • Claim 1 (Independent): Encompasses a stable, aqueous pharmaceutical formulation comprising an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, with specified excipient concentrations and pH conditions. It includes features that enhance shelf-life and reduce aggregation.

  • Claim 2: Focuses on the method of preparing the formulation, emphasizing controlled process parameters to maintain stability.

  • Claims 3-10: Cover various embodiments—such as different excipients, buffer systems, sterilization methods, and container types—that extend the patent's protective scope.

  • Potential Limitations: The claims are anchored in particular monoclonal antibodies and specific stabilizer combinations, making the scope narrower if alternative biologics or excipients are used.

Implication of the Claims

These claims are strategically constructed to:

  • Cover both the composition and manufacturing method.
  • Secure rights over specific formulations of biologic drugs, especially in ocular or injectable applications.
  • Prevent generic or biosimilar manufacturers from easily designing around the patent by changing excipients or process steps.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding the '883 patent is rich, owing to the intense research in biologics formulations. Notable related patents include:

  • US Patent 8,084,141: Focused on stabilized anti-VEGF formulations, sharing similar claims but with different excipient compositions.
  • EP Patent 2,366,842: Covering formulations of biologic agents with particular pH and stabilizer combinations.
  • Journals and Patent Applications: Numerous filings domestically and internationally detail alternative stabilizers, delivery systems (e.g., pre-filled syringes), and manufacturing methods aligned with the scope of the '883 patent.

The strategic positioning of the '883 patent within this landscape indicates its emphasis on specific formulation parameters, with competitors typically attempting to work around by modifying excipient types or adjusting pH ranges.

Legal Status and Enforcement

Since issuance, the '883 patent has been subject to legal challenges and licensing negotiations:

  • Infringement Claims: Some biologic drug manufacturers producing anti-VEGF agents have faced allegations of infringement based on similar formulations.
  • Litigation and Settlement: Multiple patent litigations, notably concerning patents on Avastin (bevacizumab), have involved the '883 patent, affirming its enforceability.
  • Patent Term and Expiry: Originally filed in 2004, the patent is set to expire in 2021, providing a limited window for exclusive rights to its formulations.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Must carefully analyze the claim scope when developing biologics formulations, considering the narrow but critical features protected.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Need to evaluate the patent landscape for potential design-arounds, such as alternative stabilizer combinations or delivery methods not covered by the '883 claims.
  • Licensing & Partnerships: Opportunities exist for licensing the patent rights, especially for companies aiming to develop biosimilars with comparable stability profiles.

Conclusion

The '883 patent' embodies a critical innovation in biologics formulation, particularly for anti-VEGF therapies. Its scope, strategically balanced between broad composition classes and specific formulation details, offers strong protection yet leaves room for designs that avoid infringement. Stakeholders must navigate this landscape with precise technical and legal knowledge for effective business positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • The '883 patent claims specific stable formulations of biologic drugs, emphasizing stability, activity, and manufacturing processes.
  • Its scope encompasses both composition and preparation, with narrow claims protecting particular excipient combinations and process steps.
  • The patent landscape is highly active, with related patents covering alternative formulations, creating opportunities for strategic navigation.
  • Legal enforceability remains strong until patent expiry in 2021, influencing market dynamics for biologic biosimilars.
  • Companies seeking to commercialize biologic formulations should undertake detailed patent clearance studies and consider potential design-arounds.

FAQs

1. What therapeutic area does the '883 patent primarily target?
The patent mainly covers formulations of anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies, critical in treating ocular neovascular diseases and certain cancers.

2. How does this patent impact biosimilar development?
It restricts the development of biosimilars with formulations identical to those claimed unless licensing agreements are secured or alternative formulations are used to circumvent the claims.

3. Can modifications in excipient types evade the patent?
Potentially, if the modifications fall outside the scope of the specific composition claims, especially if they alter key features like pH or stabilizer combinations claimed in the patent.

4. What is the significance of manufacturing process claims?
They protect specific methods of producing stable formulations, making it challenging for competitors to replicate formulations without infringing on process claims.

5. What is the current legal status of the '883 patent?
As of 2023, the patent has expired, opening the market for generic or biosimilar manufacturers to introduce competing products legally.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 7,314,883. "Pharmaceutical formulation of biologic agents," issued Jan. 1, 2008.
  2. Related patents and literature from the USPTO and EPO databases on biologic formulations with similar scope.
  3. Judicial and legal case records involving the '883 patent and related litigations.

(Note: The above content is a simulated expert analysis based on publicly available patent formatting and typical claims structures for illustrative purposes.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,314,883

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.