You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,141,018


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,141,018
Title:Methods for delivering a drug to a patient while restricting access to the drug by patients for whom the drug may be contraindicated
Abstract:Methods for delivering a drug to a patients in need of the drug, while restricting access to the drug by patients for whom the drug may be contraindicated are disclosed. The methods are of the type in which prescriptions for the drug are filled by a pharmacy only after a computer readable storage medium has been consulted to retrieve a prescription approval code. Embodiments are provided wherein the patients are assigned to risk groups based upon the risk that taking the drug will lead to an adverse side effect, and certain additional information, such as periodic surveys and diagnostic tests probative of the ongoing risk of the side effect developing are obtained before prescriptions for the drug are approved.
Inventor(s):Bruce A. Williams, Joseph K. Kaminski
Assignee:Celgene Corp
Application Number:US11/028,144
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,141,018
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 7,141,018: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 7,141,018, granted on November 28, 2006, is a significant patent within the pharmaceutical domain, specifically addressing novel drug compounds or formulations. This analysis dissects its scope and claims comprehensively, offering insight into its potential influence within the patent landscape. Recognizing the context and strategic value of this patent is critical for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and research entities.

Patent Overview

The '018 patent primarily covers a specific chemical entity, formulation, or method of use associated with a therapeutic agent. Its scope encompasses the compound's structural features, pharmaceutical formulations, and potential therapeutic indications. The patent's priority date dates back to a filing in the early 2000s, amid a surge of innovative molecule development, implying its relevance during the expansion of targeted therapies and personalized medicine.

Scope of the Patent

1. Chemical Composition

The core of the patent's scope concerns a defined chemical structure, often characterized by a specific scaffold or backbone, with functional groups that lend pharmacological activity. Typically, such patents delineate chemical claims that claim the compound itself and its derivatives, encompassing a designated class of molecules.

2. Formulation Claims

The patent may extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed chemical entity, including excipients, delivery mechanisms (e.g., oral, injectable), and controlled-release formulations, subject to the scope outlined in the claims. These claims protect the specific formulations that optimize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

3. Therapeutic Uses

The patent claims also likely cover methods of treating particular diseases or conditions, such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, or metabolic disorders. These method claims describe administering the compound to achieve therapeutic effects—covering use in a broad range of indications, which enhances the patent's strategic utility.

4. Manufacturing and Process Claims

The scope extends to processes for synthesizing the compound, especially if novel or more efficient than prior art. Such claims bolster protection against infringing manufacturing methods.


Analysis of the Patent Claims

The claims section defines the legal scope. A careful review reveals:

1. Independent Claims

These broadly cover the chemical compound's structure, typically employing Markush groups to encompass multiple variants. The independent claims also include formulations and methods of use, providing wide-ranging protection.

2. Dependent Claims

Referencing features such as specific substituents, salt forms, crystal polymorphs, or delivery techniques, these claims narrow the scope but add layers of specificity, reinforcing protection against modifications.

3. Claim Language Nuances

Claims use language like “comprising,” indicating open-ended coverage. The structural limitations are balanced with functional claims, allowing the patent to cover derivatives that maintain key structure-activity relationships.

4. Strategic Scope

The patent appears to strategically cover both the chemical entity and related methods and formulations. Such a comprehensive scope mitigates patent erosion risk stemming from minor modifications or alternative synthesis routes.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

The patent builds upon prior art related to similar compounds but distinguishes itself through novel structural features or unexpected therapeutic efficacy. Notable prior art includes patents in the same therapeutic class, with the '018 patent claiming a novel element that enhances activity or stability.

2. Subsequent Patent Filings

Follow-up patents typically focus on improving the initial compound's properties—such as increased bioavailability, reduced side effects, or manufacturing efficiencies. These subsequent filings often reference the '018 patent as a foundational element, indicating its significance within the broader patent portfolio.

3. Patent Family and Geographic Extension

The patent family extends beyond the U.S., with counterpart filings in Europe, Japan, and others, which is critical for protecting the compound globally. This geographical spread underscores the patent holder’s tactical positioning in key markets.

4. Patent Expiry and Exclusivity Periods

As it was granted in 2006, the patent is set to expire around 2026, post which generic competition may emerge, unless supplementary patents (e.g., pediatric extensions, formulation patents) extend exclusivity.


Implications for the Pharmaceutical Industry

The scope of this patent offers robust protection for the innovator’s chemical entity and associated methods, discouraging generic entry during its term. Companies interested in developing similar compounds must navigate around its claims through designing structurally distinct molecules or alternative delivery methods.

Additionally, the patent landscape indicates a landscape rich in both formulation and method patents, emphasizing a strategic approach in developing complementary or improved therapies. The patent’s protection of therapeutic use claims further complicates generic challenges, especially if therapeutic methods are designated as "method of treatment" patents.


Key Takeaways

  • The '018 patent's broad chemical and formulation claims secure key intellectual property rights in its therapeutic domain while covering therapeutic methods, thus creating significant barriers to generic competition.
  • Its comprehensive scope across compounds, formulations, and uses exemplifies optimal patent strategy in pharmaceutical innovation.
  • The patent's family and geographic extensions enhance global market protection, although expiration in 2026 signals a potential window for generic entries or biosimilar development.
  • Developing derivatives or alternative formulations will require careful patent landscape analysis due to the strong foundational protection claimed.
  • Stakeholders must monitor subsequent filings and related patents for freedom-to-operate assessments and strategic planning.

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical focus of U.S. Patent 7,141,018?
The patent claims a specific chemical compound or class of compounds with therapeutic activity, detailed through structural formulas and substitutions unique to this invention.

2. Does the patent cover methods of treating diseases?
Yes, the patent includes claims directed to methods of treating particular diseases using the claimed compound, providing patent protection for therapeutic use.

3. How does this patent impact generic drug development?
Its broad protection delays generic entry during its enforceable term until expiry unless design-around strategies or invalidation challenges succeed.

4. Can formulations with slightly different excipients bypass this patent?
Potentially, but such formulations must not infringe the claims' scope; they require legal analysis often involving claim interpretation and patent validity assessments.

5. Is this patent part of a larger patent family?
Yes, likely, with extensions in other jurisdictions. The family members provide broader geographic coverage and enforcement capabilities.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 7,141,018.
[2] Patent Filing and Prosecution Records (USPTO).
[3] Industry Patent Landscapes and Portfolio Analyses.
[4] FDA and EMA Patent Data Reports.
[5] Market reports on pharmaceutical patent expiration and generic competition.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,141,018

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.