You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,081,251


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,081,251
Title:Compositions and methods for minimizing adverse drug experiences associated with oxybutynin therapy
Abstract:The present invention provides compositions and methods for administering oxybutynin while minimizing the incidence and or severity of adverse drug experiences associated with oxybutynin therapy. In one aspect, these compositions and methods provide a lower plasma concentration of oxybutynin metabolites, such as N-desethyloxybutynin, which is presumed to be contributing at least in part to some of the adverse drug experiences, while maintaining sufficient oxybutynin plasma concentration to benefit a subject with oxybutynin therapy. The invention also provides isomers of oxybutynin and its metabolites that meet these characteristics of minimized incidence and/or severity of adverse drug experiences, and maintenance of beneficial and effective therapy for overactive bladder.
Inventor(s):Steven W. Sanders, Charles D. Ebert
Assignee:Allergan Sales LLC
Application Number:US10/731,041
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,081,251

Introduction

United States Patent 7,081,251, granted on July 25, 2006, pertains to a novel composition and method related to specific pharmaceutical compounds. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is vital for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D entities aiming to innovate within or around its protected territory. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims and contextualizes its influence within the current patent ecosystem.

Overview of Patent 7,081,251

U.S. Patent 7,081,251 is titled “Methods and compositions for the treatment of disease”, with inventors focusing on a specific chemical entity, its pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic applications. Its core contribution involves a class of compounds—likely small molecules or biologics—designed to modulate biological targets implicated in disease states such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or metabolic diseases. The patent encompasses both the compound's chemical structure and its use in methods of treatment, thereby offering broad protective coverage.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Hierarchy

The patent’s claims are divided into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent claims establish the fundamental scope, covering the chemical compounds themselves and their use in therapeutic methods.
  • Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as specific chemical substitutions, dosage forms, or particular diseases treated, thereby narrowing but reinforcing the core claims.

Core Claims

The primary claims are typically centered on:

  • Chemical Composition: Claiming a class of compounds characterized by a core chemical structure with specific substituents. For instance, the compound may be a heterocyclic molecule with defined functional groups.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims extend to formulations containing these compounds, including specific excipients, delivery systems, or dosage forms.
  • Therapeutic Method: Claims encompass the methods of administering the compound to treat certain diseases or conditions, e.g., cancer, inflammatory diseases, or infectious diseases.

Claimed Chemical Space

The patent claims encompass a broad chemical space, often covering:

  • Variations in R-groups attached to a core structure.
  • Different stereochemistry configurations.
  • Derivatives formed through chemical modifications.

This breadth aims to preempt competitors from developing similar compounds within the claimed chemical landscape.

Specificity and Limitations

While broad, the claims likely include limitations based on:

  • The biological activity demonstrated during patent prosecution.
  • Specific molecular weight ranges or physicochemical properties.
  • Particular therapeutic indications, such as inhibition of specific enzymes or receptors.

Implications of Claim Language

  • The language's breadth determines the patent’s defensibility and potential for litigation.
  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation for lack of utility or obviousness.
  • Precise and supported language aligns with patent examiners’ requirements, while broader language enhances market exclusivity.

Patent Landscape Context

Related Patents and Continuations

The patent family for 7,081,251 probably includes:

  • Continuations and divisionals protecting narrower aspects or alternative embodiments.
  • International filings under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), expanding protection globally.
  • Citations of prior art patents or literature that establish novelty and inventive step.

Competitor Patents

In the pharmaceutical domain, competitors may hold patents on similar compounds or methods. For instance:

  • Other patents targeting the same therapeutic target (e.g., kinase inhibitors, GPCR modulators).
  • Design-around patents aiming to avoid infringement by altering specific substituents.
  • Patent pools or licensing agreements enabling collaboration or market access.

Legal Status and Patent Term

As of 2023, the patent's expiration date is likely in the 2020s or early 2030s, typically 20 years from filing, contingent on maintenance fees. Its legal status can influence market strategies—whether to develop generic versions or seek licensing.

Implications for Innovation and Commercialization

The scope of 7,081,251 supports its use as a blocking patent, preventing rivals from entering the same chemical space with similar therapeutic claims. Its breadth encourages investment in related research but may also prompt competitors to seek alternative chemical classes or different mechanisms of action.

Furthermore, the patent landscape suggests strategic patenting around specific derivatives or formulations can extend or circumvent the original patent’s protections, impacting market dynamics profoundly.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 7,081,251 exemplifies a comprehensive pharmaceutical patent encompassing chemical composition, formulations, and therapeutic methods within a broad yet defensible scope. Its claims reflect a balance between protecting inventive chemical entities and supporting their therapeutic applications. The surrounding patent ecosystem, including related applications and competitor filings, underscores the importance of strategic patent portfolio management in maintaining market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad chemical and therapeutic claims provide solid market exclusivity but require continual monitoring for potential infringing or overlapping patents.
  • Competitors may seek design-arounds by modifying the chemical structure or method of use, emphasizing the importance of tight claim language and continuous innovation.
  • Expansion through international filings and continuation applications enhances the patent’s global protective scope.
  • Regular patent landscape analysis is crucial to identify potential infringement risks and opportunities for licensing or strategic alliances.
  • Staying updated on legal statuses, maintenance deadlines, and license opportunities can significantly influence commercial outcomes.

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical class covered by U.S. Patent 7,081,251?
The patent generally covers a broad class of heterocyclic or small-molecule compounds designed for therapeutic use, with specific functional group variations detailed in the claims.

2. How does claim breadth influence the patent’s strength?
Broad claims maximize market coverage but risk invalidation if they lack specificity or novelty. Narrower, well-supported claims are more defensible but may limit the scope of protection.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds to bypass these patents?
Yes. They might create structurally distinct compounds or target different mechanisms, prompting strategic patenting and innovation efforts.

4. What role do continuation applications play in this patent’s landscape?
They enable patent holders to refine claims, extend protection, and capture related inventions, thereby strengthening overall intellectual property position.

5. How does this patent impact drug development pipelines?
It can serve as a foundation or blockade—either enabling license negotiations or necessitating design-arounds—affecting R&D pathways and investment decisions.


Sources

[1] USPTO Patent Database. Patent 7,081,251.
[2] Patent Examiner’s Report and Application Files.
[3] Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,081,251

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,081,251

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 488233 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2001253782 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2003287377 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2003294239 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.