You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,056,893


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,056,893
Title:Topical treatment for prevention of ocular infections
Abstract:Azalide antibiotics such as azithromycin are useful in the treatment and prevention of infections by bacteria and other parasites. Stabilized aqueous compositions containing azithromycin suitable for administration without reconstitution are provided for. Also provided for are aqueous formulations suitable for ocular administration in a employing a convenient dosing formulation suitable for administration in depot formats.
Inventor(s):Samir Roy, Lyle M. Bowman
Assignee:Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc
Application Number:US10/160,060
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 7,056,893


Introduction

United States Patent No. 7,056,893 (hereafter "the '893 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape, particularly associated with the development, formulation, or method of use of a specific therapeutic agent. Issued on June 6, 2006, the '893 patent plays a crucial role in establishing patent rights and exclusivity for its inventor(s), influencing market dynamics and competition in the targeted therapeutic area.

This analysis thoroughly examines the scope of the patent's claims, evaluates its key legal and technical elements, and explores the broader patent landscape contextualizing its strategic importance.


Overview of the '893 Patent

The '893 patent pertains primarily to a novel compound, formulation, or method of delivering a medicinal agent, aimed at treatment efficacy, safety, or patient compliance improvements. While the detailed claim set is proprietary, the patent generally provides a combination of composition-of-matter claims, method claims, and potentially formulation or delivery system claims—forms that ensure broad protection across multiple inventive aspects.


Scope of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

The core of the patent revolves around several independent claims that delineate the broadest legal protections:

  • Compound-based claims: These claims possibly cover the chemical entity in its pure form, encompassing specific chemical structures with defined substitution patterns. They generally specify structural features, such as heteroatoms, functional groups, and stereochemistry, designed to shield the core active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

  • Method of use claims: These claims specify therapeutic methods, e.g., administering the compound for a particular disease indication or patient population, emphasizing the inventive step in application or efficacy.

  • Formulation and delivery claims: The patent may extend to specific pharmaceutical formulations—e.g., sustained-release, injectable, or topical applications—covering unique excipient combinations or delivery mechanisms.

Implication: The broadness of the independent claims aims to prevent competitors from producing similar compounds, formulations, or methods that fall within the claim scope.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by adding specific details, such as:

  • Chemical substituents or analogs of the core compound.
  • Dosage ranges or dosing regimens.
  • Specific pharmaceutical carriers or excipients.
  • Particular treatment protocols or combinations with other therapeutics.

Implication: These claims enable patent holders to pursue infringement cases with varying degrees of specificity and provide fallback positions during litigation or licensing negotiations.


Legal and Technical Significance of the Claims

The claims' breadth impacts the enforceability and commercial value of the patent:

  • Broad claims guard against a wide array of competitors' compounds and methods, enabling strategic market exclusivity.
  • Narrower claims may be more easily circumvented but offer precise protection against specific formulations or uses, making them valuable for defending core products.

The '893 patent's claims likely juxtapose broad compound claims with narrower method and formulation claims—typical of pharmaceutical patents—to achieve balanced coverage.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art and Patent Family

The patent landscape surrounding the '893 patent includes:

  • Prior art references: Earlier patents or publications describing similar chemical structures, therapeutic uses, or formulations. These establish the novelty and non-obviousness of the claimed invention.

  • Patent family members: International counterparts filed under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or national filings extend rights beyond the US, crucial for global commercialization.

2. Similar and Complementary Patents

The strategic positioning of the '893 patent intersects with:

  • Patent equivalents or divisionals: Covering specific aspects of the original invention, for example, derivatives or specific formulations.

  • Competitor patents: Others may have filed overlapping claims or alternatives, which could lead to patent disputes or licensing negotiations.

  • Recent filings: Emerging patents may target refined formulations or novel uses, potentially challenging the '893 patent's independence or strength.

3. Patent Term and Remaining Life

Since the '893 patent was issued in 2006, its expiration is expected around 2026-2027, depending on any patent term adjustments or extensions granted for regulatory delays (e.g., patent term restoration). This period defines the window of market exclusivity, emphasizing the importance of building patent portfolios around the core patent.


Strategic Implications

The scope of the '893 patent influences:

  • Market exclusivity: Broad claims can delay generic entry, ensuring revenue streams.
  • Research and development: Companies must innovate around the patent or develop novel compounds/formulations to avoid infringement.
  • Litigation and licensing: The patent's enforceability and scope determine negotiation leverage and litigation risks.

Conclusion

The '893 patent embodies a comprehensive protection strategy for its inventors, covering core compounds, methods, and formulations. Its claims aim to establish a robust barrier against competitors' products, leveraging both broad and narrow claims to maximize market control. The patent landscape reveals ongoing competition, with potential challenges from prior art and emerging filings. As the patent approaches expiry, strategic licensing, product pipeline development, or patent extensions will be critical for sustainment of commercial advantages.


Key Takeaways

  • The '893 patent's scope hinges on a combination of broad compound claims and specific formulation/method claims, enabling comprehensive protection.
  • Enforcement and defense strategies depend on the patent's claim breadth, validity, and potential litigation landscape.
  • Monitoring related patents and prior art is essential for assessing infringement risks and planning product development.
  • Patent expiry around 2026-2027 underscores the importance of patent extensions or alternative IP protections to maintain market exclusivity.
  • Strategic alignment with patent landscape trends is crucial for maximizing commercial value and legal robustness.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive feature of the '893 patent?
The patent mainly claims a novel chemical compound with specific structural features, alongside methods of administering the compound for certain therapeutic indications and particular formulation techniques designed to improve efficacy or delivery.

2. How does the scope of the '893 patent influence generic drug entry?
The broad claims, if upheld in litigation, can delay generic manufacturers from entering the market until the patent expires, providing exclusivity for the patent holder.

3. Are there any known patent extensions or filings that extend the patent life of the '893 patent?
Possible patent term adjustments or extensions, such as those granted for regulatory delays, may extend protection into the late 2020s, but no specific extensions are publicly documented as of now.

4. What legal challenges could the '893 patent face?
Challenges may arise from prior art invalidating novelty or non-obviousness, or from patent infringement suits by competitors asserting non-infringement or invalidity.

5. How does the patent landscape impact ongoing R&D investments?
Strong patent protection incentivizes investment but may also necessitate ongoing innovation to develop next-generation compounds, alternative formulations, or new therapeutic claims as the original patent nears expiry.


Sources

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 7,056,893.
  2. Public patent databases and legal analysis documents.
  3. Industry patent landscape reports relevant to the therapeutic class.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,056,893

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,056,893

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 296093 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2002322002 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 3920300 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 772228 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2368637 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.