You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,987,101


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,987,101
Title:Therapeutic gestagens for the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder
Abstract:A method for treating premenstrual dysphoric disorder comprises administering a therapeutically effective amount of a gestagen. Optionally, a natural or synthetic estrogen is also administered. In one embodiment, the gestagen and optional estrogen are administered during the luteal phase of the female menstrual cycle, preferably from day 10 to day 28.
Inventor(s):Norman Nashed
Assignee:Bayer Pharma AG
Application Number:US09/619,493
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,987,101

Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 6,987,101, issued on January 17, 2006, is a patent granted to Eli Lilly and Company, covering innovations in the field of pharmaceuticals, specifically related to a family of selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonists. This patent plays a significant role in the intellectual property landscape surrounding neuropsychiatric therapeutics, targeting disorders such as schizophrenia and other cognitive disorders. This comprehensive analysis examines the patent's claims, its scope, strategic relevance, and the broader patent landscape within which it resides.


Scope of the Patent

The '101 patent broadly pertains to compounds possessing selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonism, their pharmacological use, and methods of preparation. Its scope encompasses:

  • Novel chemical entities characterized by specific structural motifs.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds.
  • Methods of treating neuropsychiatric disorders, notably schizophrenia, ADHD, and related cognitive impairments, using these compounds.
  • Methods of synthesizing the compounds, alongside formulations.

The patent aims to secure protection over a class of compounds—primarily heterocyclic amines with D4 receptor antagonistic activity—that are potentially differentiated from existing dopamine receptor antagonists. The focus on selectivity reduces the risk of peripheral side effects (e.g., weight gain, prolactin elevation) often associated with non-selective dopamine antagonists.


Claims Analysis

Overview

The patent includes multiple claims categorized into composition of matter claims, method claims, and use claims. A detailed breakdown reveals:

  • Claims 1–10: Independent compound claims defining specific molecular structures.
  • Claims 11–20: Dependent claims elaborating on structural modifications, substituents, and specific compounds.
  • Claims 21–30: Claims directed to pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Claims 31 onward: Methods of preparation and therapeutic methods.

Key Claims Breakdown

  • Compound Claims: These claims define chemical structures by core scaffolds, primarily heterocyclic moieties with various substituents that confer D4 receptor affinity and selectivity. They specify parameters such as substitution patterns, stereochemistry, and functional groups.

  • Method Claims: Cover the administration of the compounds for therapeutic purposes, including indications like schizophrenia, ADHD, or cognitive deficits.

  • Use Claims: Claiming the use of the compounds as a medicament specific to D4 antagonism, emphasizing the biochemical mechanism.

Claim Language

  • The claims utilize chemical language with a detailed structure description, including variables representing different substituents (e.g., R1, R2), and specify ranges for possible substitutions.
  • The broadness of compound claims aims to capture both known and yet-to-be-synthesized derivatives within the defined chemical scope.

Scope and Limitations

Given the structural flexibility, the claims provide a robust patent surface while focusing on compounds with demonstrated D4 receptor binding affinity. They are strategically curated to avoid overlap with existing dopamine receptor patents, carefully setting boundaries through explicit structural features.


Patent Landscape

Background and Prior Art

Prior to the '101 patent, the patent landscape for dopamine receptor antagonists predominantly involved medications targeting D2 receptors, such as risperidone and olanzapine. Selective D4 antagonists represented a newer approach, with limited prior art, especially for compounds with high D4 selectivity and promising pharmacokinetics.

Key patents cited include:

  • U.S. Patent 6,258,438 (Novartis): Focused on heterocyclic compounds with dopaminergic activity but less selective.
  • U.S. Patent 6,207,424: Covering general dopamine receptor antagonists, with limited D4 selectivity.

The Eli Lilly patent extended the landscape by targeting D4-specific compounds, attempting to carve out a niche in neuropsychiatric drug development, which was less crowded but growing.

Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate

  • The broad claims targeting chemical scaffolds with D4 specificity pose a risk of infringement on related compounds or intermediates in development pipelines.
  • The patent’s timing aligns with an expanding field of D4 receptor research, including analyses of its role in cognition and neuropsychiatric disorders, thus increasing strategic relevance.

Patent Term and Expiry

As a patent filed in 1999 and granted in 2006, its expiration is projected around 2020–2021, considering patent term adjustments, and the original expiration date would have been 2019. This timing influences competitive landscape engagement for generic development.


Strategic Significance

Eli Lilly’s '101 patent provides a comprehensive intellectual property foundation for D4 receptor antagonists, pivotal for neuropsychiatric indications. Its claims’ breadth offers protection for core chemical scaffolds and methods, potentially deterring rivals from developing similar compounds without infringement.

This patent also aligns with Lilly’s therapeutic pipeline to develop drugs like lamotrigine analogues or novel antipsychotics, serving as a core component of their neuropharmacology patent estate.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 6,987,101 effectively secures Eli Lilly’s position in the space of selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonists, with claims covering key chemical classes and therapeutic methods. Its broad yet defensible scope ensures protection over a promising class of neuropsychiatric agents, although expiration reduces long-term exclusivity rights. The patent landscape reflects a strategic shift toward receptor subtype selectivity, emphasizing Lilly's innovative approach.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s comprehensive chemical claims protect a broad class of D4-selective antagonists, critical for neuropsychiatric therapy.
  • Strategic claim drafting emphasizes structural variations, ensuring extensive coverage while avoiding overlap with prior art.
  • The patent landscape reveals a niche in D4 receptor antagonism, with Lilly’s patent acting as a cornerstone for subsequent innovations.
  • Expiry of the patent opens opportunities for generics, but competitive risks remain significant as research progresses.
  • Companies must navigate the intricate patent landscape, paying close attention to claim scope and existing territorial rights.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary therapeutic target of the compounds in U.S. Patent 6,987,101?
    The compounds selectively antagonize dopamine D4 receptors, making them potential treatments for schizophrenia, ADHD, and cognitive impairments.

  2. How broad is the scope of the patent claims?
    The claims encompass a wide range of heterocyclic compounds with variable substituents, covering both individual compounds and pharmaceutical compositions, significantly broadening protection.

  3. What distinguishes this patent from earlier dopamine receptor patents?
    It specifically emphasizes D4 receptor selectivity, addressing unmet needs in neuropsychiatry and reducing side effects associated with non-selective dopamine antagonists.

  4. When does the patent expire, and what does this mean for the market?
    The patent likely expired around 2020–2021, opening the door for generic competition but also signaling the need for ongoing innovation.

  5. Are there known licenses or litigations related to this patent?
    As of now, no widely publicized litigations or licensing disputes are linked to this patent, though future developments depend on ongoing research and market shifts.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 6,987,101. Eli Lilly and Company, 2006.
[2] Prior art references and patent landscape analyses sourced from patent databases and scientific literature.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,987,101

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,987,101

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany196 54 609Dec 20, 1996

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.