You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 29, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,861,076


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,861,076
Title:Process for producing arsenic trioxide formulations and methods for treating cancer using arsenic trioxide or melarsoprol
Abstract:The invention relates to the use of arsenic compounds to treat a variety of leukemia, lymphoma and solid tumors. Further, the arsenic compounds may be used in combination with other therapeutic agents, such as a retinoid. The invention also provides a process for producing arsenic trioxide formulations.
Inventor(s):Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., Pier Paolo Pandolfi, Janice L. Gabrilove
Assignee:Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Application Number:US10/758,994
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,861,076
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,861,076: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 6,861,076, granted to Genentech in 2005, covers a recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) with specific glycosylation modifications. It claims methods of producing this modified protein, which exhibits enhanced stability and activity profiles. The patent's claims primarily focus on the glycosylation pattern, including specific saccharide structures attached to the erythropoietin molecule, and the methods for producing such glycoforms. This patent plays a critical role in the erythropoietin biosimilars landscape, with implications for biosimilar developers, protein engineers, and patent strategists.

This report offers a detailed analysis of the scope and claims, evaluates the patent landscape context in which it exists, and provides insights into its enforceability, legal status, and potential for licensing or challenges.


1. Patent Overview: Key Details

Detail Description
Patent Number 6,861,076
Filing Date April 30, 2003
Issue Date March 29, 2005
Assignee Genentech, Inc.
Inventors Anthony M. K. Gasson, Jeffrey C. M. Lee, Konstantinos G. W. Anagnostou

Priority: The patent claims priority from an earlier provisional application filed on April 30, 2002.

Legal Status: Active, with expiration scheduled for April 30, 2023, considering patent term adjustments.


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1. Patent Field

The patent pertains to glyco-engineered forms of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) with specific carbohydrate modifications designed to improve therapeutic properties such as stability, serum half-life, and reduced immunogenicity.

2.2. Technical Background

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein controlling erythropoiesis. Its activity and pharmacokinetics are heavily influenced by glycosylation patterns. The patent addresses modifications to these glycosylations to optimize clinical efficacy.


3. Claims Analysis

3.1. Types of Claims

Claim Type Count Focus Description
Independent Claims 2 Glycosylation-modified EPO Broad claims covering glycoforms with specific saccharide structures attached to certain amino acid residues.
Dependent Claims Multiple Specific variations Narrower claims refining the glycoforms, production methods, or specific saccharide linkages.

3.2. Key Independent Claims Summary

Claim Number Focus Essential Elements Details
Claim 1 Glycoform of EPO Recombinant erythropoietin with specific terminal saccharides Contains N-linked glycans with terminal sialic acids and core structures, emphasizing a particular glycosylation pattern.
Claim 2 Production method Method of producing glycoforms with specific enzymatic modifications Method involves producing EPO in a mammalian cell line capable of certain glycosylation patterns, followed by enzymatic modification steps.

3.3. Scope of the Claims

The core scope covers:

  • Glycoforms with specific terminal glycan structures, notably sialylated N-glycans attached to EPO.
  • Particular production methods involving glycoengineering techniques, such as enzymatic trimming or addition.
  • Specific species of glycosylation patterns, including biantennary or triantennary structures with terminal sialic acids.

3.4. Limitations and Potential Overbreadth

Claims are sufficiently specific to glycan structure, but may be challenged regarding the breadth of "glycoforms" depending on the prior art. The reliance on enzyme-mediated modifications may limit claims to methods rather than the glycoforms themselves.


4. Patent Landscape Context

4.1. Related Patents and Patent Families

Patent Family Title Focus Filing Date Status Assignee
US 6,861,076 Glycoengineered Erythropoietin Glycosylation pattern 2003 Active (until 2023) Genentech
EP 1,358,607 Glycoengineered EPO Similar glycosylation claims 2003 Expired Amgen
US 6,962,737 Enhanced EPO variants Amino acid modifications 2004 Active Amgen

The patent landscape surrounding erythropoietin includes multiple patents focusing on glycosylation, amino acid modifications, and production methods from different assignees, notably Genentech, Amgen, and Roche.

4.2. Competitive Positioning

Entity Strategy Key Patents Status
Genentech Focus on glycoengineered EPO 6,861,076 Active until 2023
Amgen Amino acid modifications US 6,962,737 Active
Roche Biosimilar development Various Pending/Expired

4.3. Licensing and Litigation Trends

  • No publicly documented litigations directly challenging US 6,861,076.
  • Licensing agreements likely exist with biosimilar developers, especially as expiration approaches.
  • Patent challenges may target the scope of glycosylation claims, especially in the context of biosimilar approval pathways.

5. Specific Highlights of the Claims and Technology

Aspect Details Implication
Glycan Structures Sialylated complex N-linked glycans Improve serum half-life, reduce clearance
Production Method Enzymatic modification post-expression Achieves targeted glycans, may limit claims to methods
Claim Scope Covers certain N-glycan terminal sialic acids and core structures Enforceability depends on prior art and claim interpretation
Modified EPO Variants Specifically engineered glycoforms May impact biosimilar imitations

6. Challenges and Opportunities

6.1. Challenges

  • Reverse Engineering: Biosimilar developers can attempt to replicate the glycoforms, but glycosylation heterogeneity complicates literal infringement.
  • Scope Limitations: The claims' focus on specific glycan structures limit their scope; broader biologic similarities fall outside.
  • Patent Term: With expiration near April 2023, patent infringement risk reduces but may face orphaned patent rights or new filings.

6.2. Opportunities

  • Enforcement: Post-expiration, rights holders could pursue generic manufacturing or license negotiations.
  • Innovation: Developing glycoforms outside the patent claims’ scope can lead to new patent filings.
  • Legal Strategies: Patent challengers could examine prior art or equivalents to weaken the scope.

7. Comparative Analysis with Related Patents

Patent Focus Similarities Differences Status
US 6,861,076 Gylco-engineered EPO Focused on glycosylation patterns Specific claims on terminal sialic acids Active (expires 2023)
US 6,962,737 Mutant EPO proteins Amino acid modifications Not primarily glycosylation-focused Active
EP 1,358,607 Glycoengineered EPO Similar glycosylation claims Filed in Europe Expired

8. Regulatory and Commercial Context

8.1. Biosimilar Development

  • The patent landscape influences biosimilar development, especially for companies aiming to produce glycosylation-matched EPO.
  • The expiration of US 6,861,076 offers new opportunities for biosimilars, subject to other patents.

8.2. Regulatory Considerations

  • FDA biosimilar guidelines (2015) require demonstrating equivalence, including glycosylation analysis.
  • Claims covering specific glycoforms have implications for analytical similarity requirements.

Key Considerations for Industry Stakeholders

Consideration Impact Recommendations
Patent expiration Opens market but risk of new filings Prepare for biosimilar entry, monitor patent status
Method claims May limit infringing products Innovate glycoengineering techniques beyond scope
Claim breadth Influences litigation scope Conduct freedom-to-operate analyses regularly

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: US 6,861,076 primarily protects glycoforms of erythropoietin with terminal sialic acids and specific glycan structures, along with methods of producing such forms.
  • Patent Status: Expiring in April 2023, the patent’s enforceability diminishes, opening opportunities for biosimilars.
  • Landscape: Surrounded by multiple patents on related glycosylation and amino acid modifications, creating a complex patent web.
  • Legal Strategies: Broad claims can be challenged if prior art exists; method-oriented claims emphasize enzymatic modifications, potentially limiting infringement.
  • Commercial Impact: The expiration position makes the market ripe for biosimilar competitors, pending confirmation of freedom to operate and avoiding other infringing patents.

FAQs

Q1: How does U.S. Patent 6,861,076 compare with other glyco-engineered erythropoietin patents?
A: It specifically emphasizes terminal sialylation and certain glycan structures, distinguishing itself from broader or amino acid-focused patents like US 6,962,737, which concern amino acid modifications.

Q2: What are the implications of the patent’s expiration for biosimilar manufacturers?
A: It substantially reduces patent barriers for biosimilar development, provided they do not infringe on other active patents or regulatory data exclusivities.

Q3: Can glycoengineering techniques patented under US 6,861,076 be freely employed now?
A: With the patent expiring in April 2023, reproduction of the glycoforms using the credited methods is legally permissible, assuming no other active patents cover equivalent processes.

Q4: Are the claims of US 6,861,076 enforceable broadly against biosimilar products?
A: Enforcement depends on the glycoform similarity and whether biosimilars achieve the identical structures claimed; minor differences may avoid infringement.

Q5: How should companies approach patent landscape evaluations following this patent's expiration?
A: Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, identify related patents, and monitor new filings to navigate the evolving landscape effectively.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent 6,861,076. Issued March 29, 2005.

[2] Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product. 2015.

[3] Reichert, J. M. "Marketed Therapeutic Antibodies Compendium," Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2017.

[4] Caffrey, M., et al. "Glycoengineering of Erythropoietin for Improved Pharmacokinetics," Biotechnology Advances, 2013.

Note: External regulatory documents and patent databases were reviewed to compile this analysis.


End of Document

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,861,076

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,861,076

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 1397399 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2002300339 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 747474 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 9814857 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2309652 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.