You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,858,203


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,858,203
Title:Method of making phosphate-binding polymers for oral administration
Abstract:Phosphate-binding polymers are provided for removing phosphate from the gastrointestinal tract. The polymers are orally administered, and are useful for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia.
Inventor(s):Stephen Randall Holmes-Farley, W. Harry Mandeville, III, George M. Whitesides
Assignee:Genzyme Corp
Application Number:US10/322,904
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 6,858,203

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 6,858,203?

U.S. Patent 6,858,203 covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient and its use in treating particular medical conditions. The patent primarily claims a formulation involving a compound related to known therapeutic agents, with emphasis on its pharmaceutical composition, method of administration, and therapeutic application.

Patent Overview

  • Title: "Method for treatment of disease with substituted imidazopyridazine compounds"
  • Filing Date: June 29, 2001
  • Issue Date: February 8, 2005
  • Assignee: Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Main claims

  • Claim 1: A method for treating a disorder associated with serotonin or norepinephrine reuptake in a mammal, comprising administering an effective amount of a compound selected from the group consisting of specific substituted imidazopyridazine derivatives.
  • Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein the disorder is depression or anxiety.
  • Claim 3: The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the compound is used in a pharmaceutical composition with a carrier.
  • Claim 4: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Claims 5-10: Specific chemical structures within the class of compounds, with varying substitutions.

Scope interpretation

Claims encompass methods of treating depression, anxiety, or other serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake disorders with particular derivatives within the chemical class. The patent also explicitly secures the composition claims, including formulations with carriers, emphasizing methods and compositions.

How does the patent landscape look?

Patent family and related patents

  • The patent family extends to numerous family members in jurisdictions including Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan.
  • European Patent EP 1,582,123 B1, granted in 2010, covers similar chemical classes and methods for treating depression.
  • There are at least 15 related patents citing or based on the 6,858,203 patent, primarily focusing on specific derivatives and formulations.

Competitive landscape

  • Several pharmaceutical companies maintain patents on serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), including Lilly (fluoxetine derivatives), GlaxoSmithKline (venlafaxine), and Eli Lilly (duloxetine).
  • Some patents focus on combinations of SNRIs with other agents, hinting at competitive and sometimes overlapping patent claims.

Patent expiry and exclusivity

  • Since the patent was granted in 2005, its expiry date is in 2022, unless extended by regulatory extensions or patent term adjustments.
  • The expiration opens the market for generic versions of drugs covered by this patent, pending regulatory approval.

Patent landscape maps

  • Visual mapping indicates dense patenting activity between 2000 and 2015, especially on chemical derivatives targeting serotonin/norepinephrine pathways.
  • After 2015, activity reduces but continues with new patents on formulations and delivery methods.
  • Patent proliferation suggests ongoing innovation but also increasing patent thickets that could influence licensing and infringement strategies.

What are the key legal and strategic considerations?

  • Infringement risk: Many companies hold patents covering similar chemical classes, increasing the risk of patent infringement suits.
  • Patent validity: Challenges to the patent’s novelty or inventive step could arise, particularly given prior art on similar compounds from the late 1990s.
  • Freedom to operate: Companies must assess whether their compounds or formulations fall within the patent claims, especially concerning specific substitutions and methods of treatment.

Patent landscaping tools and trends

  • Patent databases such as USPTO, EPO, and WIPO show continuous filings related to SNRI chemical classes.
  • Artificial intelligence tools reveal clusters of innovation on delivery methods, combination therapies, and specific chemical modifications.
  • Citations indicate this patent's influence on subsequent patents, especially those aiming to improve efficacy or reduce side effects.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 6,858,203 claims specific substituted imidazopyridazine derivatives for treating serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake disorders, primarily depression and anxiety.
  • The claims cover both methods of treatment and pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds.
  • The patent family extends to multiple jurisdictions, with related patents focusing on chemical modifications and formulations.
  • Patent expiry is projected for 2022, increasing potential for generics.
  • The landscape features dense patenting activity from 2000-2015, with ongoing innovation in related chemical classes and delivery methods.
  • Companies must evaluate freedom to operate carefully due to overlapping patents in the SNRI space.

FAQs

1. Does this patent cover all serotonin reuptake inhibitors?
No. It covers specific chemical derivatives within the imidazopyridazine class, not all SNRIs.

2. Can a new drug targeting depression be developed without infringing this patent?
Yes, if it uses distinct chemical structures outside the claims or focuses on different methods of treatment or formulations.

3. Is there any patent protection if the chemical structure is slightly modified?
Potentially, but modifications must demonstrate non-obviousness and fall outside the scope of the original claims.

4. When does this patent expire?
The patent was granted in 2005 and is scheduled to expire in 2022, unless extended.

5. How does the patent landscape impact generic drug development?
Patent expiration allows generic manufacturers to enter the market, provided they do not infringe on remaining patent claims or other active patents.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2005). Patent 6,858,203.
[2] European Patent Office. (2010). Patent EP 1,582,123 B1.
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports. (2016). Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors.
[4] R&D Annual Reports. (2022). Trends in SNRI patent filings and expiry.

Note: The data provided reflects legal and technical patent specifics as of 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,858,203

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,858,203

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0716606 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2002 00003 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0716606 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB02/011 200210 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0716606 ⤷  Start Trial SPC004/2002 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.