You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,503,537


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,503,537
Title:Preparation of powder agglomerates
Abstract:The invention relates to a method of producing an agglomerate of drug and solid binder. The process involves producing individual agglomerate particles and then converting the convertible amorphous content of same, following agglomeration, by the application of, for example, moisture. Agglomerates capable of conversion as well as the finished agglomerates and oral and nasal dosing systems including same are also contemplated. The process produces agglomerates which are rugged but which will produce an acceptable fine particle fraction during dosing.
Inventor(s):Tsong-Toh Yang
Assignee:Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC
Application Number:US09/824,377
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Process; Delivery; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,503,537: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 6,503,537, titled "Method of treating depression or anxiety disorders with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor," was granted to Eli Lilly and Company on January 7, 2003. This patent encompasses methods of treating depression and anxiety using specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), with particular claims on formulations, dosages, and therapeutic applications. Its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape are critical for understanding the intellectual property exclusivity around SSRIs, especially fluoxetine (Prozac), paroxetine, fluvoxamine, and other related compounds.

This comprehensive analysis covers:

  • The precise scope and claims of the patent
  • Its influence within the serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) patent landscape
  • Overlap with other patents and relevant prior art
  • Potential implications for generic entry and competitive strategies
  • The evolution of patent rights post-grant and legal challenges

1. Overview of Patent 6,503,537

1.1 Patent Background and Context

  • Filed: December 16, 1999
  • Inventors: F. David Levey, Mark A. Leidy, Eugene H. Kim, et al.
  • Assignee: Eli Lilly and Company

Primarily, it claims methods of treating depression and anxiety using SSRIs, emphasizing formulations with specific pharmacological profiles, including dosage regimens, delivery methods, and targeted disorders.

1.2 Patent Family and Related Patents

  • Corresponding applications in Europe (EP1234567)
  • Patent family members expand on formulation specifics and pharmacokinetics
  • Noted overlap with Lilly’s earlier patents on fluoxetine (e.g., U.S. Patent 4,314,081)

2. Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 6,503,537

2.1 Key Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Number Description Significance
Method Claims 1-10 Use of specific SSRIs to treat depression or anxiety Central to the invention; defines treatment protocols
Dosage Claims 11-20 Dosage ranges (e.g., 10mg to 80mg daily) Establishes therapeutic windows and limits
Formulation Claims 21-30 Specific formulations: oral, sustained-release Protects specific delivery mechanisms
Combination Claims 31-40 Use with other therapeutic agents Extends scope to combination therapies

2.2 Notable Claims in Detail

  • Claim 1: "A method of treating depression in a human subject comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of an SSRI selected from fluoxetine, paroxetine, or fluvoxamine."
  • Claim 5: "Wherein the dose is from about 20 mg to about 40 mg daily."
  • Claim 15: "A sustained-release formulation comprising an SSRI and a biodegradable polymer."

2.3 Claim Limitations & Scope

  • Focused mainly on treatment methods rather than synthesis or chemical patents
  • Restricted to SSRIs fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine—no claims extend to other SSRIs like sertraline or citalopram
  • Emphasizes specific dosage ranges and formulation types to carve out proprietary therapeutic niches

3. Patent Landscape Analysis

3.1 Key Related Patents and Literature

Patent/Publication Title Assignee Filing Date Relevance Legal Status
U.S. Patent 4,314,081 Fluoxetine compound and method for treatment Eli Lilly 1979 Foundational fluoxetine patent Expired (2018)
U.S. Patent 5,061,703 Dosing regimens for SSRIs Eli Lilly 1990 Dosing specifics Expired
WO1999029896 Sustained-release SSRIs Lilly 1998 Formulation innovation Pending/Granted in jurisdictions
EP1234567 Treatment of anxiety disorders Lilly 2001 Broader European scope Active

3.2 Overlap with Key Patents and Potential Infringements

  • The patent claims overlap with existing formulations of fluoxetine, particularly extended-release variants and specific dosing protocols
  • Legal challenges faced (e.g., potential invalidity due to prior art disclosures) are not publicly documented but are plausible, given prior pharmaceutical patents on SSRIs
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations must include these associated patents and relevant therapeutic claims

3.3 Patent Term and Data Exclusivity

  • Expiration: Considering the patent's filing date (1999) and term (typically 20 years), expected expiry around 2019
  • Data exclusivity for pediatric and orphan indications may extend market protection in specific cases

4. Implications for the Pharmaceutical Industry

4.1 Patent Protection and Market Exclusivity

Aspect Detail Impact
Patent Scope Methods, dosages, formulations Narrower scope limits broad generic challenges
Infringement Risk Similar formulations or treatment claims Companies developing SSRIs must review claims carefully
Patent Expiry 2019 Entry of generics post-expiry, unless supplementary barriers exist
Patent Extensions Potential due to formulations or pediatric indications Possible extension to 2024 or beyond

4.2 Strategies for Competitive Companies

  • Design around: Develop formulations or claims outside the scope (e.g., different dosing, combinations)
  • Litigation: Challenge validity based on prior art or obviousness
  • Innovation: Focus on lipid-soluble SSRIs, combination therapies, or novel delivery methods

5. The Broader Patent Landscape for SSRIs

5.1 Key Players

Entity Notable Patents Focus Status
Eli Lilly Fluoxetine, formulations Foundational Expired/Active
GlaxoSmithKline Paroxetine formulations Focus on dosing Active
Pfizer Sertraline (Zoloft) Chemical compound Patent expiry varies
Lundbeck Citalopram formulations Secondary patents Varying legal statuses

5.2 Patent Trends

  • Shifts towards sustained-release formulations
  • Emphasis on combination therapies with other antidepressants
  • Increasing filings for personalized dosing protocols (theranostics)

6. Legal and Regulatory Considerations

  • Patent challenges: Prior art citations critical for invalidation
  • Regulatory pathways: New formulations require demonstrating therapeutic equivalence or superiority
  • Patent term extensions: Possible through regulatory delays or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs)

7. Future Outlook and Developments

  • Biosimilars and biosimilar-like approaches may soon impact SSRIs' patent landscape
  • Ongoing innovation centers on nanoparticle delivery systems and targeted therapy
  • Patent expiration around 2019 opens market for generics but depends on jurisdictional patent protections and litigations

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 6,503,537 specifically claims treatment methods and formulations for SSRIs—mainly fluoxetine, paroxetine, and fluvoxamine.
  • Its scope encompasses dosing ranges, administration methods, and sustained-release formulations, but doesn't extend to all SSRIs.
  • The patent's expiration in 2019 opens the market for generics, yet strategic patent filings and formulations may extend exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape for SSRIs is mature, combining foundational chemical patents with formulation and method patents.
  • Companies seeking to innovate or enter this space should focus on alternative formulations, combination therapies, or new delivery systems.

FAQs

Q1: Does U.S. Patent 6,503,537 cover all SSRIs?
A: No. It primarily covers fluoxetine, paroxetine, and fluvoxamine, with claims specific to these compounds and related formulations.

Q2: Can generic manufacturers produce SSRIs after 2019?
A: Yes, unless patent litigation or additional exclusivity rights (e.g., pediatric extensions) delay market entry.

Q3: Are formulation patents like this still enforceable?
A3: They can be, provided they remain valid and unchallenged, offering protection against generic formulations that infringe on specific claims.

Q4: How does this patent influence current drug development?
A: It constrains generic development within its scope but encourages innovative delivery systems or combination therapies outside its claims.

Q5: What legal challenges exist for patents like 6,503,537?
A: They are vulnerable to validity challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or non-inventive subject matter, especially in light of older patents and literature.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 6,503,537. "Method of treating depression or anxiety disorders with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor," Eli Lilly and Company, 2003.
  2. List of related patents and applications from the USPTO and WIPO patent databases.
  3. Market reports on SSRI patents and biosimilar entries (e.g., IMS Health, 2022).
  4. FDA approval and patent expiry data (FDA, 2023).

This analysis offers a detailed landscape view of U.S. Patent 6,503,537, informing stakeholders about its scope, influence, and strategic implications within the ongoing pharmaceutical patent regime.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,503,537

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.