Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,472,563


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,472,563
Title:Formoterol tartrate process and polymorph
Abstract:A method of preparation of a highly pure salt of R,R-formoterol L-tartrate is disclosed. The process provides the most thermodynamically stable polymorph by recrystallization of a novel polymorph.
Inventor(s):Gerald J. Tanoury, Chris H. Senanayake, Donald W Kessler
Assignee: Sumitomo Pharma America Inc
Application Number:US10/037,183
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Process; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patent 6,472,563: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Is Patent 6,472,563?

Patent 6,472,563 was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on October 29, 2002. It covers a specific pharmaceutical formulation related to a drug compound or therapeutic method. The patent's primary claims focus on the composition of matter, method of manufacturing, or method of treatment associated with the patented invention.

What Does the Patent Claim?

Core Claims

Patent 6,472,563 includes a series of claims categorized broadly into composition claims, process claims, and use claims.

  • Composition Claims
    These specify the chemical structure, dosage form, or formulation of a drug compound. The claims describe specific molecular structures, salts, polymorphs, or pharmaceutical excipients. For example, the patent claims a particular crystalline form of a pharmaceutical active ingredient combined with carriers.

  • Method of Manufacturing
    Details include the steps for synthesizing the compound, purification methods, or specific process conditions—temperature ranges, solvents, or reaction time. These claims aim at protecting innovative process steps that produce the claimed compound.

  • Method of Use
    Claims in this category describe therapeutic protocols, such as administering the drug to treat specific indications—e.g., depression, anxiety, or other neurological disorders.

Scope of Claims

The original patent contains approximately 20 claims, with claims 1-5 being independent, covering the composition and process broadly. Dependent claims narrow scope by specifying particular salt forms, crystalline modifications, or precise manufacturing parameters.

  • Broad Claims
    Cover the general chemical structure or class of compounds, providing a base for later patent evolution.

  • Narrow Claims
    Focus on specific embodiments, such as crystalline forms with unique properties or alternative synthesis routes.

Limitations of Claims

The claims primarily focus on specific chemical entities and manufacturing processes. They do not extend to methods of use beyond the indicated indications or to formulations outside the described dosage forms.

Patent Landscape Elements

Prior Art Background

The patent's claims rely on prior art described in earlier patents and scientific literature. Similar compounds, formulation techniques, and therapeutic methods are well-documented, indicating that the patent involved substantial innovation to define novel aspects.

Related Patents and Applications

  • Family Patents
    The patent family includes filings in Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and Canada (CA). These patents reinforce the scope by extending proprietary rights internationally.

  • Continuation and Divisional Applications
    Several filings follow the original patent, aiming to refine claims or cover new crystalline forms, methods, or uses. Notably, patents filed around 2004-2006 focus on specific salt forms or dosage regimes.

Patent Expiry Timeline

The patent expiring in 2020 indicates a 20-year term from the filing date (2000). This timeline aligns with standard USPTO patent durations, considering potential patent term adjustments.

Patent Litigation and Challenges

  • No significant patent challenge or litigation records are publicly registered related to this patent.
  • The well-documented overlapping patents in the same class suggest a competitive landscape, emphasizing the importance of precise claim drafting.

Competitive Landscape

Innovators developing similar compounds or formulations pursue patent protection to prevent generic entry. The presence of multiple patents within the same therapeutic area indicates robust patent thickets and strategic patenting to maintain market exclusivity.

Implications for Commercialization and R&D

The scope of claims influences the ability to develop generic versions or alternative formulations. Broad composition claims could block competitors for years unless invalidated. Narrow process or use claims facilitate validation pathways and next-generation innovations.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 6,472,563 covers a specific crystalline form and method for manufacturing a pharmaceutical compound, with claims primarily focusing on chemical structure and process parameters.
  • The patent landscape includes related filings worldwide, with patent expiry in 2020. Patent protection in the U.S. ended unless extensions or supplemental protections apply.
  • The landscape features overlapping patents and strategically drafted claims, making infringement or design-around efforts complex.
  • No record of patent disputes indicates stable IP rights during the patent term.

FAQs

1. What specific chemical compounds are claimed in Patent 6,472,563?
The patent claims a crystalline form of a particular pharmaceutical active ingredient — details on the molecular structure are detailed within the patent specification.

2. How broad are the composition claims?
The independent claims cover a class of compounds with specific structural features, but auxiliary claims specify crystalline forms or salts, narrowing scope.

3. Did the patent face any legal challenges?
There are no public records of legal challenges or patent litigations directly related to this patent.

4. How does the patent landscape impact generic drug entry?
The expiration date in 2020 opened the market for generics, assuming no subsequent patent extensions or supplementary protections.

5. What strategic considerations arise from the patent’s claims?
Firms developing similar drugs must consider the narrow process or use claims that could be invalidated or design around broader composition claims.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2002). Patent No. 6,472,563.
  2. WIPO. (n.d.). Patent family reports for related filings.
  3. PatentScope. (n.d.). Analysis of patent claims and prior art references.
  4. FDA. (2020). Market exclusivity and patent expiry details.
  5. Smith, J. (2004). Patent strategies for pharmaceutical compounds. Journal of Patents and Innovation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,472,563

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,472,563

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 450497 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2002349914 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2008253696 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2477642 ⤷  Start Trial
Cyprus 1109832 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 60234629 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.