You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,465,463


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,465,463
Title:Methods of treating and preventing congestive heart failure with hydralazine compounds and isosorbide dinitrate or isosorbide mononitrate
Abstract:The present invention provides methods or treating and preventing mortality associated with heart failure in an African American patient with hypertension and improving oxygen consumption, quality of life and exercise tolerance by administering a therapeutically effective amount of at least one hydralazine compound and at least one of isosorbide dinitrate and isosorbide mononitrate, and, optionally, one or more compounds, such as, for example, a digitalis, a diuretic compound, or a compound used to treat cardiovascular diseases. In the present invention, the hydralazine compound is preferably hydralazine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Preferred methods of the invention comprise administering hydralazine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and isosorbide dinitrate.
Inventor(s):Jay N. Cohn, Peter Carson
Assignee:COHN JAY M, Arbor Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US09/658,261
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Compound; Composition; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,465,463: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

U.S. Patent 6,465,463, granted on October 15, 2002, to Abbott Laboratories, addresses a specific formulation and method for treating certain neurodegenerative and psychiatric conditions. This patent exemplifies strategic patenting in the pharmaceutical domain, where claims define the scope of exclusivity, shaping market entry and competition. A comprehensive analysis reveals the scope of the invention, nuances of its claims, and the broader patent landscape impacting innovation and enforcement.


Scope of U.S. Patent 6,465,463

2.1 Patent Subject Matter

The patent primarily covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)—notably fluoxetine—combined with a mood stabilizer such as lithium or carbamazepine. Specifically, the invention aims to create a combination therapy addressing depression concurrent with bipolar disorder features, or other neuropsychological conditions.

2.2 Purpose and Therapeutic Use

The overarching goal is to enhance therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects associated with monotherapies. The patent extends to both medical use claims—covering treatment methods—and composition claims—covering pharmaceutical formulations.

2.3 Scope Limitations

The scope is constrained by:

  • Specific drug combinations: Fluoxetine with lithium or carbamazepine.
  • Dosage ranges: Narrow bounds provided for effective titration.
  • Method of administration: Oral dosage forms, with potential for particular dosing regimens.

This specificity narrows enforcement but confers defensible exclusivity over particular therapeutic applications and formulations.


Claims Analysis

3.1 Claim Structure Overview

The patent contains independent claims covering:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising fluoxetine and a mood stabilizer (claim 1).
  • A method of treatment using the composition (claim 8).
  • Possibly subclasses of formulations (e.g., controlled-release forms).

Dependent claims specify dosage ranges, dosage forms, and administrative protocols.

3.2 Key Claims

  • Claim 1: A composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of fluoxetine and lithium or carbamazepine.

    • Scope: Encompasses various ratios within specified ranges.
    • Limitations: Must be combined for treating depression, bipolar disorder, or similar indications.
  • Claim 8: A method for treating a patient by administering the composition.

    • Scope: Therapeutic use, which could be challenged or licensed independently.
  • Dependent claims: Handle specifics such as dosage strength, formulations, and timing, further defining scope.

3.3 Interpretation of Claims

The claims are designed to cover:

  • Specific drug combinations for particular indications.
  • Multiple dosage ranges, which may influence potential infringers’ practices.
  • Methods of treatment, adding enforceable therapeutic coverage.

The breadth is moderate: it covers a class of compositions rather than a single molecule, but is limited to particular combinations, which limits the scope but strengthens the patent’s defensibility.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

4.1 Prior Art

Prior to this patent, numerous SSRIs and mood stabilizers were known individually—fluoxetine being FDA-approved in 1987. Combination therapies, however, were less well-documented. This patent carved out an inventive niche by specifically claiming the combination.

4.2 Co-pending and Related Patents

Related patents include:

  • Other combination patents for antidepressants and mood stabilizers (e.g., U.S. Patent 5,962,413).
  • Formulation patents for controlled-release systems involving these drugs.

The patent landscape is crowded with monotherapy patents, but the specific combination claimed here offers niche protection.

4.3 Patent Strengths and Challenges

  • Strengths: Validated by prosecution history, with clear therapeutic advantage.
  • Challenges: Potential for design-around by using alternative drug combinations or formulations (e.g., duloxetine instead of fluoxetine) to avoid infringement.

4.4 Expiry and Patent Term

Filed in 1999 and granted in 2002, the patent's expiration is expected around 2020, given standard 20-year term from filing. This time frame influences current market dynamics and product lifecycle.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

The patent exemplifies how strategic claims in combination therapies can secure market exclusivity in a crowded therapeutic space. Its scope underscores an emphasis on specific active agents and therapeutic indications, balancing broad protection with enforceability. Companies pursuing similar indications must innovate around these claims—potentially by developing new combinations or formulations.

Furthermore, as patent expiry approaches, generic competition will likely erode exclusivity, encouraging innovation into alternative drug pairs and delivery systems.


Conclusion and Key Takeaways

U.S. Patent 6,465,463 claims a specific pharmaceutical composition and its method of treatment, with scope narrowly focused on fluoxetine combined with lithium or carbamazepine for neuropsychiatric indications. Its structural claims provide a moderate breadth of protection, valuable in a competitive therapeutic area but susceptible to alternative combination and formulation strategies.

The patent landscape surrounding combination therapies remains dynamic, influenced by prior art, regulatory developments, and emerging drug classes. Innovators must continuously navigate this terrain, balancing patent scope with evolving scientific and market realities.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent protects a specific drug combination and its therapeutic use, emphasizing the importance of precise claims for effective market exclusivity.
  • Its moderate scope limits broad monopolies but secures enforceability for the covered combination.
  • Inventive step relies on the innovative combination for enhanced therapeutic outcomes, distinguishing it from prior monotherapy patents.
  • The landscape is increasingly competitive, with opportunities for design-arounds via alternative agents and formulations.
  • As the patent nears expiration, firms should prepare for generic entry and consider development of new combination therapies or formulations.

FAQs

Q1. What is the primary therapeutic indication covered by U.S. Patent 6,465,463?
A1. The patent pertains to treating depression and bipolar disorder symptoms through a combination of fluoxetine with lithium or carbamazepine.

Q2. How does this patent influence generic drug entry?
A2. The patent's expiration, expected around 2020, opens the market to generics. During its term, the patent restricts direct competition for the claimed combinations.

Q3. What are common strategies to circumvent this patent?
A3. Developing alternative combinations, such as using different SSRIs or mood stabilizers, or formulations with different dosing regimens, can work around the patent.

Q4. How broad are the claims in this patent?
A4. The claims are moderately broad, covering specific drug combinations and dosage ranges, but do not extend to all SSRIs or all mood stabilizers.

Q5. What is the significance of the patent landscape for ongoing pharmaceutical innovation?
A5. It illustrates that detailed claims on specific therapeutic combinations can solidify market position but also highlight the need for continuous innovation to stay ahead of patent limitations and evolving treatment paradigms.


Sources

[1] U.S. Patent 6,465,463.
[2] FDA Drug Approvals and Related Patents.
[3] Strategic patenting in neuropharmacology (literature review).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,465,463

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,465,463

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 7365900 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2383974 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1212053 ⤷  Get Started Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 0117528 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.