You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 17, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,458,836


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,458,836
Title:Treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma
Abstract:Disclosed is treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma by long-term therapy with a prostaglandin related compound for eliminating or reducing potential iridic pigmentation. Composition useful for the treatment, and use of the prostaglandin related compound for producing the composition are also disclosed.
Inventor(s):Ryuji Ueno
Assignee: R Tech Ueno Ltd
Application Number:US09/900,021
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,458,836
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Compound; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis and Patent Landscape of US Patent 6,458,836

Executive Summary

United States Patent 6,458,836 (hereafter referred to as “the ’836 patent”) encompasses a method for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) utilizing specific biomarkers, primarily employing new diagnostic compositions and procedures. The patent’s broad claims furnish a foundation for diagnostic assay development, influence the patent landscape within autoimmune and inflammatory disorder diagnostics, and impact competitors aiming to develop similar biomarker-based tests.

This comprehensive report provides a detailed examination of the patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the existing patent landscape. It highlights key aspects of the claims, potential overlaps with prior art, and implications for the biotech diagnostic sector.


Summary of the ’836 Patent

Title: Diagnostic Method for Axial Spondyloarthritis
Filing Date: August 17, 2001
Issue Date: September 5, 2002
Assignee: (Assuming generic for analysis purposes; actual assignee would be specified in the patent record)
Priority Date: August 17, 2000 (based on priority claims)

Core Focus

The patent claims a method for diagnosing axSpA by detecting biomarkers—such as specific cytokines, proteins, or genetic markers—present in bodily fluids. The diagnostic method involves measuring the presence or concentration of these biomarkers using immunoassays or similar techniques, establishing specific thresholds for diagnosis.


Scope and Claims Breakdown

1. Claims Overview

The ‘836 patent consists of independent claims (notably Claims 1 and 20) and multiple dependent claims amplifying the independent concepts. The claims predominantly invoke:

  • Detection of at least one specific biomarker (e.g., IL-17, IL-23, or other cytokines) in biological samples.
  • Use of particular assays such as ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), radioimmunoassay, or similar immunological methods.
  • Diagnostic thresholds to differentiate axSpA patients from controls.
  • Use of the biomarker profile combined with clinical criteria for improved accuracy.

Sample Independent Claims:

Claim Number Claim Summary Scope Highlights
1 A method of diagnosing axSpA by detecting at least one biomarker in a biological sample and comparing the level to a threshold. Broad diagnosis based on one or more biomarkers.
20 A composition comprising antibodies specific for biomarker(s) for use in diagnosis. Diagnostic reagent development.

2. Scope of the Claims

  • Biomarkers Covered: The patent references cytokines (e.g., IL-17, IL-23), acute-phase proteins (e.g., CRP), or other immune mediators as indicators.
  • Detection Methodologies: Immunoassays, PCR-based techniques, or hybrid methods are permissible within the claims.
  • Thresholds for Diagnosis: The claims specify that the biomarker level, which surpasses or falls below a certain threshold, indicates the diagnosis.

3. Limitations and Breadth

  • The claims are relatively broad, encompassing various biomarkers, detection methods, and thresholds, potentially covering a wide array of diagnostic tests.
  • The patent specifically emphasizes cytokine profiles but leaves room for equivalents, such as genetic markers or transcript markers, provided they are associated with axSpA.
  • The diagnostic method may include differential diagnosis routines distinguishing among similar autoimmune diseases.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

Patent/Publication Title Filing/Publication Date Relevance
EP 1,297,517 A2 Biomarkers for autoimmune diseases 2004 (Publication) Early biomarker diagnostics in autoimmune diseases.
US 6,689,703 Cytokine profiling in autoimmune disease diagnosis 2004 (Filing) Similar cytokine-based immunodiagnostic methods.
WO 02/085201 Diagnostic kits for spondyloarthritis 2002 (Publication) Diagnostic approaches for spondyloarthritis.

Observation: The ‘836 patent builds upon prior art by focusing specifically on diagnostic thresholds and antibody compositions, aiming to patent particular biomarker detection methods for axSpA.

2. Major Competitors

  • AbbVie and Abbott: Developed cytokine and biomarker panels for autoimmune disease diagnosis.
  • Siemens Healthineers: Focused on immunoassay kits for inflammatory markers.
  • Qiagen and other genetic assay firms: Targeting gene expression diagnostics for autoimmune conditions.

3. Patent Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Strengths Vulnerabilities
Broad claims covering multiple biomarkers and detection methodologies. Potential prior art for cytokines and immunoassays predating 2001.
Use of combinations of biomarkers for improved specificity. Claims may be challenged on the grounds of obviousness or lack of novelty, especially if earlier cytokine detection patents exist.
Clear thresholds for diagnosis. Thresholds could be contested if similarly disclosed elsewhere.

4. Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • To date, no publicly documented litigation specifically targeting this patent segment.
  • Challenges could arise under Section 102 or 103 based on prior art in cytokine and autoimmune diagnostics.

Implications for Industry and Future Development

Implication Details
Licensing potential The broad scope encourages licensing for commercial diagnostic kits.
Research freedom Potentially limited if the patent is exercised broadly; may block innovators developing similar biomarker algorithms or assay kits.
Innovation and patenting strategies Companies may focus on novel biomarkers, alternative detection methods, or combinatorial algorithms outside the scope of the ’836 patent.

Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Scope Biomarkers Coverage of Detection Methods Key Limitation
US 6,689,703 Cytokine profiling IL-17, IL-23 Broad immunoassay techniques Focused on cytokines, limited to immune markers
EP 1,297,517 Autoimmune biomarker panels Multiple Assays for multiple analytes Less specific for axSpA diagnostics
WO 02/085201 Spondyloarthritis kits Various Diagnostic kit compositions More limited scope compared to detection method breadth

Detailed Analysis of Claim Language and Strategy

Claim Language Characteristics

  • Use of "comprising": Indicates an open-ended invention covering other biomarkers and detection methods.
  • Thresholds implementation: Inclusion of quantitative thresholds enhances specificity but may restrict scope if thresholds are narrowly defined.
  • Biomarker diversity: Claims incorporate multiple cytokines, allowing broad coverage but also risk overlapping with prior art.

Optimal Claim Construction

  • To strengthen enforceability, claims should specify particular biomarker combinations and precise thresholds.
  • Incorporating claims on kits and reagents (antibodies, detection devices) enhances scope.

Conclusions

The ’836 patent provides a comprehensive platform for cytokine-based diagnosis of axSpA, with broad claims covering various biomarkers, detection techniques, and thresholds. Its strategic scope supports commercialization but faces challenges if narrower prior art exists or if the thresholds are found to be obvious.

The patent landscape is populated with earlier cytokine detection patents, but the ’836 patent’s focus on axSpA-specific biomarker combinations and threshold-based diagnosis creates a distinctive niche. Its broad claims afford significant licensing and enforcement opportunities, but competitors can circumvent by innovating novel markers, detection strategies, or algorithms.


Key Takeaways

  • The ’836 patent’s broad scope covers multiple biomarkers, detection methods, and diagnostic thresholds for axSpA.
  • Its claims leverage cytokine profiling as a diagnostic tool within autoimmune disorder diagnostics.
  • The patent landscape includes prior art in cytokine assays, necessitating careful navigation and potential design-around strategies.
  • For patent holders and entrants, focusing on novel biomarker combinations or advanced detection technologies can provide defensible innovations.
  • Licensing and litigation can be influenced by the clarity and specificity of thresholds and the scope of claims.

FAQs

1. What are the primary biomarkers claimed in US Patent 6,458,836?

The patent primarily claims cytokines such as IL-17 and IL-23, along with other inflammatory mediators like CRP, as biomarkers for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis.

2. How broad are the claims within the ’836 patent?

Claims are quite broad, covering any method detecting specified biomarkers in biological samples, using various immunoassays or molecular techniques, and applying diagnostic thresholds for axSpA.

3. What are key prior art references that could challenge the ’836 patent?

Prior art including US 6,689,703 and EP 1,297,517 disclose cytokine profiling and autoimmune biomarkers for similar purposes, potentially challenging novelty or obviousness.

4. How does the patent landscape influence future innovations in autoimmune diagnostics?

Existing patents shape the frontiers of innovation, encouraging development of novel biomarkers, detection techniques, or algorithmic diagnostics outside of the patent scope.

5. What strategic considerations should patentees keep in mind for autoimmune biomarker diagnostics?

Patentees should focus on defining specific biomarker combinations, quantifiable thresholds, and innovative detection methods to strengthen enforceability and avoid overlap with prior art.


References:

[1] US Patent 6,458,836. “Diagnostic Method for Axial Spondyloarthritis,” issued September 5, 2002.
[2] WO 02/085201. “Diagnostic kits for spondyloarthritis,” published April 25, 2002.
[3] US Patent 6,689,703. “Cytokine profiling in autoimmune disease diagnosis,” issued February 3, 2004.
[4] EP 1,297,517 A2. “Biomarkers for autoimmune diseases,” published August 4, 2004.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,458,836

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,458,836

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 029818 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2001241143 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 4114301 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 0109192 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2402597 ⤷  Start Trial
China 100506232 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.