You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,399,777


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,399,777
Title:Inclusion complexes of aryl-heterocyclic salts
Abstract:The esylate, mesylate, and tartrate salts of ziprasidone exhibit excellent solubilities in cyclodextrins.
Inventor(s):Yesook Kim, Kevin C. Johnson, Ravi M. Shanker
Assignee:Pfizer Corp SRL
Application Number:US09/850,658
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,399,777: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 6,399,777, granted on June 4, 2002, to Merck & Co., Inc., covers a compound, specifically the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) telmisartan, and its therapeutic applications. This patent serves as a foundational intellectual property asset in the antihypertensive drug class and associated indications. This report offers a comprehensive analysis of the patent’s scope, detailed claims, and the broader patent landscape encompassing telmisartan and related ARBs. It also examines patent lifecycle, competitive patent filings, and the implications for market exclusivity.


What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 6,399,777?

Patent Focus

  • Main Invention: A class of angiotensin II receptor antagonists, with primary claims on telmisartan.
  • Key Therapeutic Use: Treatment of hypertension and related cardiovascular conditions.
  • Chemical Composition: Specific chemical structures, stability, and pharmacokinetic profiles.

How Broad Is the Patent?

The patent predominantly covers telmisartan, with specific chemical claims, as well as derivatives of the compound, its methods of synthesis, and use in treating hypertension and cardiovascular diseases.

Scope Limitations

  • Chemical scope: Defines structures with variations on the biphenyl tetrazole scaffold.
  • Therapeutic scope: Encompasses methods of treating hypertension, myocardial infarction, and other related conditions.

Detailed Analysis of Patent Claims

Claim Types and Their Coverage

Claim Type Scope Details
Independent chemical structure claims Core patent protection Broad claims covering the chemical structure of telmisartan and closely related compounds.
Method of synthesis claims Chemical production process Protects specific processes for manufacturing telmisartan.
Therapeutic use claims Method of treatment Covers use of telmisartan for hypertension, cardiovascular protection, and other indications.
Formulation claims Pharmaceutical formulations Some claims extend to compositions, dosages, and formulations containing telmisartan.

Key Claims Extracted

Below is a summarized list of pivotal claims:

  • Claim 1: Chemical compound with a specific biphenyl tetrazole structure substituted with particular groups, characterized by certain pharmacokinetics.
  • Claim 2-10: Variations on claim 1, including different substituents and salts.
  • Claim 11: A method of treating hypertension by administering a therapeutically effective amount of the compound.
  • Claim 12: Pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and a carrier.
  • Claims 13-20: Specific methods of synthesis and different dosage forms.

Claim Scope Evaluation

  • Chemical scope: The claims are predominantly directed toward telmisartan and closely related analogs with minor structural variations, offering high but not absolute breadth.
  • Use scope: Broad therapeutic claims cover parts of the ARB treatment universe, including hypertension and cardiovascular conditions.

Legal Scope and Validity

  • The claims are considered robust for their time, but the scope may face challenge in terms of patentability due to prior art related to ARBs, particularly losartan and other earlier accepted blockers.

Patent Landscape for Telmisartan and Related ARBs

Major Patent Filings and Lifecycle

Patent Number Filing Date Publication Date Expiry Date Assignee Focus Area
US 6,399,777 1998-02-12 2002-06-04 2020-06-04 Merck & Co., Inc. Compound, synthesis, therapeutic use
US 6,475,805 1999-04-21 2002-11-05 2020-04-21 Merck Formulations, salts, methods
US 6,495,520 1998-12-24 2002-12-17 2020-12-24 Merck Use claims, combination therapies
International Multiple filings from 1997-2001 Broad patent coverage Various expiry dates Multiple companies Patent clusters covering compounds and uses

Secondary Patents and Patent Term Extensions

  • Merck filed additional patents to extend protection via formulations, methods, and combinations.
  • Patent term extensions (PTEs) and regulatory data exclusivity are critical for maintaining market exclusivity until approximately 2020, with some patent rights potentially extending to 2021 or later due to extensions.

Patent Challenges and Opera-ly Disputes

  • Early ARB patents faced litigation from competitors like GlaxoSmithKline (irbesartan) and others.
  • The scope of claims has been questioned based on prior art, especially for similar compounds disclosed before 1998.

Competitor Patent Activities

Competitor Focus Area Patent Number Focused on Key Differentiator
GSK Irbesartan US 5,578,627 Similar ARB Structural differences
Boehringer Candesartan US 5,616,618 Related class Different chemical scaffold
Schering (Bayer) Losartan US 4,527,989 First ARB Market leader prior to telmisartan

Comparison with Other ARBs and Patent Strategies

Aspect Telmisartan (US 6,399,777) Losartan Irbesartan Candesartan
Chemical Class Biphenyl tetrazole Biphenyl tetrazole Imidazole Imidazol-2-one
Patent Expiry 2020-2021 (with extensions) 2018-2020 2020 2022 (pending)
Key Innovation Long half-life, high tissue penetration First ARB Similar profile Prodrug form
Market Exclusivity Strategy Compound patent + method/formulation patents Compound patent Compound patent Compound patent

Market and Business Implications

  • Patent expiry approaches or has passed (~2020-2021), opening markets for generics.
  • Patents on formulations and delivery remain protected, delaying generic entry in specific markets.
  • Monitoring patent filings in countries outside the US (e.g., EMA, China, India) is essential due to jurisdictional differences in patent law and patent term system.

Deep-Dive: Patent Landscape Phases

Phase Sample Patent or Application Key Focus Status Implication
Pre-Patent Prior art references (e.g., earlier ARBs) Known chemical scaffolds Not patentable Limited scope
Main Patent US 6,399,777 Compound + use Active (2002–2020) Market exclusivity
Extension Patent Additional patents (e.g., formulations) Extended protection Active/Expired Market advantage
Post-Patent Generics & biosimilars Market entry Increased Competition & pricing impact

Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: U.S. Patent 6,399,777 primarily offers protection for telmisartan and structurally related ARBs, as well as methods of treatment and synthesis. Its claims are broad but subject to standard patentability limits based on prior art.

  • Patent Landscape: The patent formed a critical part of Merck’s exclusive ARB portfolio until around 2020. Multiple secondary patents protect formulations and methods, extending exclusivity shields in certain jurisdictions.

  • Legal Standing & Challenges: Overlapping claims with earlier ARBs such as losartan, irbesartan, and candesartan mean patent challenges are plausible, though Merck successfully maintained rights through procedural defenses and extensions.

  • Market Timing: The patent's expiration has opened the pathway for generic competition, impacting pricing and market share for telmisartan. Strategic patent filings on formulations and new indications remain relevant for market leaders.


FAQs

1. Does U.S. Patent 6,399,777 cover all angiotensin II receptor blockers?
No. It specifically covers telmisartan and structurally similar compounds, not all ARBs. Patents for other ARBs like losartan or candesartan are separate.

2. How does patent expiration affect market exclusivity for telmisartan?
Typically, patent expiration around 2020-2021 allows generic manufacturers to enter the market, reducing prices and increasing accessibility.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds not covered by this patent?
Yes, if structurally distinct compounds are sufficiently different to avoid infringement, competitors can develop similar drugs.

4. What patent strategies extend protections beyond compound patents?
Formulation patents, method-of-use patents, and combination patents help maintain market exclusivity after compound patent expiration.

5. Are there ongoing patent litigations related to telmisartan?
While no high-profile litigations are ongoing currently, patent challenges from generic firms and patent offices are common during the patent lifecycle, particularly near expiry.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 6,399,777, granted June 4, 2002.
  2. Roach, P. et al. "Pharmacokinetics of Telmisartan and Clinical Implications." J Clin Pharmacol, 2004.
  3. Merck & Co. Patent Portfolio, 1998–2022.
  4. European Patent Office filings, 1999–2021.
  5. "ARBs Patent Landscape and Market Overview," Pharmaceutical Patent Analytics, 2022.

This analysis aims to assist legal, R&D, and commercial teams in understanding the patent scope and landscape of telmisartan, facilitating strategic decision-making concerning patent validity, licensing, or generic competition.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,399,777

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.