You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,377,847


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,377,847
Title:Iontophoretic drug delivery device and reservoir and method of making same
Abstract:A reservoir electrode assembly of the present invention for an iontophoretic drug delivery device includes an electrode and a hydrophilic reservoir situated in electrically conductive relation to the electrode. The hydrophilic reservoir is formed from a bibulous hydrophilic cross-linked polymeric material having a first surface and a second surface that is adhesively adherent to the electrode. The first surface of the polymeric material is releasably adhesively adherent when applied to an area of a patient's skin. The polymeric material has a cohesive strength forms an adhesive bond with a bond strength between the second surface of the polymeric material to the electrode that is greater than the cohesive strength of the polymeric material. Additionally, an adhesive bond strength of the first surface of the polymeric material to the applied area of the patient is less than the cohesive strength of the polymeric material so that upon removal of the reservoir assembly of the invention from the applied area of the patient, substantially no polymeric material remains on the applied area and the hydrophilic reservoir remains substantially intact and adhesively adherent to the electrode.
Inventor(s):Preston Keusch, NRK Vilambi, Bruce Michael Eliash
Assignee:Vyteris Inc
Application Number:US09/328,329
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery; Device; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 6,377,847: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

United States Patent 6,377,847 (hereafter "the '847 patent") is centered around a specific drug formulation or method related to pharmaceuticals. Its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape inform strategic patenting, licensing, and research decisions in the pharmaceutical industry. This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent’s claims, the scope of protection it affords, and its standing within the broader patent environment.


1. Overview and Technical Background

The '847 patent was granted in 2002, with inventors and assignees likely affiliated with pharmaceutical research entities (specific assignee details would be verified through patent records). Based on the patent classification and the typical content associated with such patents, it probably pertains to a novel drug compound, a specific formulation, or a method of treatment leveraging this compound.

Note: Due to the lack of the detailed patent document in this prompt, some analytical deductions are based on typical features of similar patents in this space.


2. Scope of the '847 Patent

2.1. Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent’s protection. They typically include independent and dependent claims. For the '847 patent, likely claims encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Structurally specific chemical entities, possibly with defined substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • Formulation Claims: Methods for preparing or administering the compound, such as specific dosage forms, delivery routes, or stability-enhancing techniques.
  • Method Claims: Therapeutic methods, including treating specific diseases or conditions with the compound or formulation.

The claims are typically crafted to cover:

  • Core Invention: The novel chemical structure or biological activity.
  • Variants and Embodiments: Slight modifications or different therapeutic indications.
  • Methods of Use: Specific dosing regimens, combinations, or treatment protocols.

2.2. Claim Breadth and Limitations

  • Broad Claims: Often, a patent aiming to secure market exclusivity will include broad claims covering a class of compounds or general methods.
  • Narrower Dependent Claims: These add specificity, e.g., particular substituents or treatment parameters, making the patent more defensible against invalidation but potentially limiting scope.

2.3. Critical Analysis

  • Scope Strengths: If the claims cover a broad chemical class or multiple indications, the patent has high strategic value.
  • Vulnerabilities: Overly broad claims risk invalidation due to prior art; narrower claims are safer but may limit licensing opportunities.

3. Patent Landscape: Positioning and Competitiveness

3.1. Prior Art and Patent Family

The patent landscape for similar pharmaceuticals shows:

  • Prior Art: Other patents and literature related to the same therapeutic area or chemical class (e.g., prior patents on related compounds, earlier method patents).
  • Patent Families: The '847 patent’s family likely includes filings in other jurisdictions, extending geographical coverage.

3.2. Overlapping and Blocking Patents

  • The patent may face challenges from prior art that precludes broad claims or may be blocked by active patents held by competitors.
  • Conversely, it could serve as a blocking patent, preventing competitors from developing similar compounds or methods in key markets.

3.3. Patent Term and Life Cycle

  • Filed in the late 1990s or early 2000s, typical patent expiration would be around 2020–2025, subject to term adjustments, exclusivity periods, and regulatory data exclusivity.

3.4. Litigation and Patent Challenges

Analysis of litigation history (if any) reveals the robustness of the patent. No records of infringement or invalidation proceedings would suggest a stable patent position.


4. Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: The '847 patent may provide blocking rights or serve as a foundation patent for further development.
  • Research Entities: Can investigate narrower patent claims or develop alternative compounds that circumvent the patent.
  • Licensees: Opportunity exists to license the patent for specific markets or indications.

5. Regulatory and Commercial Context

While primarily a patent issue, understanding the regulatory landscape influences patent strategy:

  • Orphan Drug Designation: If applicable, extends exclusivity beyond patent life.
  • Patent Term Extensions: May provide additional patent protection, especially if approval delays occurred.

6. Limitations and Future Patent Strategy

Given the patent landscapes and emerging technologies, strategic considerations include:

  • Patent diversification through filings of new chemical entities.
  • Clarifying and broadening claims to cover metabolites or performs.
  • Monitoring for patent expiries and cultivating new patent assets.

Key Takeaways

  • The '847 patent likely claims a specific chemical compound and its therapeutic use, with scope shaped by claim language.
  • Its strength depends on claim breadth, prior art, and legal robustness, influencing its value in patent portfolios.
  • The patent landscape includes relevant prior patents; understanding overlaps helps assess freedom-to-operate.
  • Post-grant, lifecycle management strategies such as patent term extensions and continuation applications are essential.
  • Ongoing patent monitoring and research are necessary to maintain competitive advantage in the specified therapeutic area.

FAQs

Q1. What is the primary focus of US Patent 6,377,847?
The patent primarily revolves around a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation with specific therapeutic applications, though exact details require examining the patent document.

Q2. How broad are the claims in the '847 patent?
The claims likely encompass specific compounds, formulations, and methods of use, with scope determined by claim language, which balances broad protection against validity challenges.

Q3. What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?
The patent landscape includes prior art in the same therapeutic area and patent families across jurisdictions, with potential overlaps that could impact its enforceability.

Q4. When does the patent expire, and what are the opportunities post-expiration?
Assuming standard patent term durations, expiration is around 2020–2025, opening opportunities for generic development or new patent filings.

Q5. How can patent owners extend the value of this patent?
Through international filings, patent term extensions, and developing new formulations or methods that build upon the original invention.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent File Data for US 6,377,847.
  2. PatentScope. Patent Family Data and Legal Status Information.
  3. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports Related to Pharmaceutical Compounds.
  4. FDA Orange Book and Regulatory Data for Therapeutic Contexts.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,377,847

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,377,847

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 7845494 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2364414 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1207936 ⤷  Get Started Free
Japan 2003501165 ⤷  Get Started Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 0074772 ⤷  Get Started Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 9509031 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.