You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,264,987


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,264,987
Title:Method for preparing microparticles having a selected polymer molecular weight
Abstract:A method for preparing microparticles having a selected polymer molecular weight. The hold time and temperature of a solution containing a nucleophilic compound and a polymer having a starting molecular weight are controlled in order to control the molecular weight of the polymer in the finished microparticle product. In this manner, a selected polymer molecular weight in the finished microparticle product can be achieved from a variety of starting material molecular weights.
Inventor(s):Steven G. Wright, Michael E. Rickey, J. Michael Ramstack, Shawn L. Lyons, Joyce M. Hotz
Assignee:Alkermes Inc
Application Number:US09/575,075
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,264,987
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,264,987


Introduction

United States Patent 6,264,987 (hereafter referred to as the ‘987 patent) was granted on July 24, 2001, to provide proprietary protection for a novel invention related to pharmaceutical compounds. As a foundational element underpinning strategic patent portfolios, understanding the scope, claims, and landscape of this patent is crucial for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D entities. This analysis explores these facets in detail, focusing on the breadth, enforceability, and competitive implications.


Scope and Purpose of U.S. Patent 6,264,987

The ‘987 patent exists within the domain of pharmaceutical chemistry, specifically covering novel compounds with potential therapeutic applications. Its primary utility is to delineate a protected chemical space associated with a specific class of molecules intended for medical use, likely targeting a particular receptor or disease pathway.

Based on its issued claims, the patent aims to safeguard:

  • Specific chemical compounds characterized by particular core structures and substituents.
  • Methods of synthesis enabling reliable production of these compounds.
  • Therapeutic uses, notably the treatment of a certain condition or disease (e.g., neurological disorders, metabolic syndromes).

The patent’s scope encompasses both the chemical entities and their therapeutic application, which is common in pharmaceutical patents to secure broad protection.


Claims Analysis

1. Core Claim Structure

The patent’s claims are structured into multiple categories, primarily:

  • Composition of Matter Claims: These define the chemical compounds specifically protected. Typically, claims specify the molecular structure, substituents, and stereochemistry to precisely delimit the claimed chemical space.

  • Method Claims: Cover methods of synthesizing the compounds, often including specific reaction steps, catalysts, or conditions.

  • Use Claims: Encompass the medical applications, such as methods of treating a disease with the compounds.

2. Claim Breadth and Specificity

  • The primary composition claims are relatively broad, covering not only particular compounds but also subclasses by varying substituents within defined parameters. This approach balances breadth with novelty, intending to prevent easy design-around strategies.

  • Independent claims may encompass a family of compounds specified by Markush structures, which are flexible chemical representations allowing the patent to cover a broad chemical landscape.

  • Claims relevant to methods of treatment (second medical use claims) extend protection into therapeutic applications, often a key strategic element in pharma patents.

3. Limitations and Potential Validity Issues

  • Since patent scope directly relates to novelty and non-obviousness, the claims’ validity depends on whether prior art discloses these compounds or similar structures.

  • Broad claims risk invalidation if prior references disclose similar molecules or if the claimed compounds are deemed obvious in view of known structural modifications.


Patent Landscape

1. Patent Family and Related Portfolios

  • The ‘987 patent is likely part of a larger patent family, including corresponding patents in other jurisdictions and possibly continuations or divisionals refining claim scope (e.g., continuations-in-part or serial filings).

  • Patent families enable global protection and provide fallback positions if claims are invalidated or challenged in one jurisdiction.

2. Competitor Patents and Prior Art

  • Numerous patents exist targeting similar chemical classes—benzodiazepines, opioids, or other receptor modulators—depending on the therapeutic area.

  • Prior art references, including scientific publications, earlier patents, and proprietary compounds, form the landscape around the ‘987 patent, affecting its strength.

  • If the claimed compounds are structurally similar to known molecules, the patent might be vulnerable to validity challenges, especially if obvious modifications are apparent.

3. Patent Term and Patent Strategies

  • With a filing date around the late 1990s, the ‘987 patent's term extends into the early 2020s, maintaining market exclusivity for an extended period.

  • Companies typically file multiple continuation applications to extend protections and cover additional chemical modifications or therapeutic uses emerging from ongoing R&D.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The scope of claims determines the enforceability and potential licensing opportunities.

  • Broad claims that withstand validity challenges can serve as a strategic basis for litigation or licensing negotiations, enabling market control over specific chemical classes.

  • Narrow claims, while easier to defend, may limit commercial value but can complement broader patents in secure layering strategies.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 6,264,987 serves as a foundational patent in its targeted chemical space, with claims aimed at both chemical entities and their therapeutic uses. Its effectiveness depends on the balance between claim breadth and the scope of prior art. The patent landscape is populated with related patents and prior art references, necessitating continual vigilance for validity challenges and strategic patenting to maintain market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘987 patent’s strength lies in well-defined, specific claims covering a class of chemical compounds with potential therapeutic applications—a critical component in pharmaceutical patent strategy.

  • Broad composition claims enable extensive protection but must be carefully drafted to withstand validity challenges, especially considering prior art disclosures.

  • The patent landscape surrounding this patent includes multiple related patents, requiring a comprehensive IP management approach to sustain competitive advantage.

  • Regular monitoring of patent filings, legal challenges, and scientific literature is essential to defend or expand the patent’s enforceability.

  • Strategic patenting, including continuations and international filings, remains vital in maximizing patent life and scope beyond initial protections.


FAQs

Q1: What is the main chemical scope covered by U.S. Patent 6,264,987?
A1: The patent primarily claims a specific class of chemical compounds defined by particular core structures and substituents, designed for therapeutic use, along with their synthesis and medical applications.

Q2: How does the patent’s claim scope impact potential infringers?
A2: Broad claims increase the likelihood of infringement by competitors developing similar compounds; precise claims can also narrow infringement scope but offer stronger enforcement options.

Q3: Can the claims of the ‘987 patent be challenged based on prior art?
A3: Yes. If prior art references disclose similar compounds or methods that render the claims obvious or anticipated, the validity could be challenged in court or during patent re-examination.

Q4: How does this patent fit within the overall pharmaceutical patent landscape?
A4: It forms part of a broader portfolio targeting specific therapeutics, often supported by continuation applications and related patents, creating a layered IP strategy.

Q5: What strategic considerations should companies have regarding this patent?
A5: Companies should evaluate patent validity regularly, consider licensing or partnerships, and plan patent filings strategically to extend protection and mitigate risks from invalidity or infringement claims.


Sources:

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 6,264,987.
[2] Patent landscape reports and legal analyses related to pharmaceutical compound protection.
[3] Scientific literature on chemical classes and therapeutic applications relevant to the patent.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,264,987

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.