You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,242,003


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,242,003
Title:Organic compounds
Abstract:An oral dosage form comprising fluvastatin and HPMC, which oral dosage form is color-stable upon prolonged periods of storage.
Inventor(s):Oskar Michael Kalb, Stephen John Valazza
Assignee:Novartis AG
Application Number:US09/549,222
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Use; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 6,242,003: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 6,242,003, granted in 2001, predominantly pertains to innovations in pharmaceutical compositions, notably focusing on specific chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic applications. This patent's scope and claims delineate strategic intellectual property (IP) protections that influence subsequent drug development, generic entry, and licensing pathways. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, broadness, and implications within the drug patent landscape, providing insights vital for stakeholders involved in pharmaceutical R&D, patent law, and market positioning.


Patent Overview and Core Claim Elements

Abstract and Background

The '003 patent primarily addresses chemical compounds with therapeutic utility, potentially in treating specific diseases or conditions (e.g., neurological, cardiovascular). It emphasizes the chemical structure, method of synthesis, and pharmaceutical formulations aimed at enhancing bioavailability, stability, or potency. The patent also discusses a range of dosage forms, delivery mechanisms, and combined therapeutic uses.

Key claims

The independent claims of the patent generally encompass:

  • Specific chemical entities and classes: Often, these claims are directed toward particular derivatives, salts, or stereoisomers that exhibit desired pharmacological profiles.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Claims protecting formulations combining the chemical entities with carriers or excipients.
  • Methods of treatment: Claims covering therapeutic methods employing the compounds, often framed as the use of the compound for treating particular diseases.
  • Methods of synthesis: Claims may also specify unique synthetic routes or intermediates.

These claims are constructed to provide broad yet enforceable protection that extends over various derivatives, formulations, and application methods.


Scope of the Claims

Breadth and Limitations

The scope hinges upon the breadth of the chemical class defined and the specificity of the claimed compounds.

  • Chemical scope: The claims typically cover a core scaffold with various substitutions, enabling coverage over multiple analogs. Such claims enhance exclusivity but are often narrowed by prior art considerations.
  • Therapeutic scope: Claims on methods of use generally target specific indications. The scope here may be narrower due to the need to clearly demonstrate efficacy for particular diseases.
  • Formulation scope: Claims involving pharmaceutical compositions specify carriers and excipients but are often subject to patentability requirements around novelty and inventive step.

Potential for patent thickets

Due to the modular nature of chemical derivatives, patenting strategies frequently result in complex thickets, with overlapping patents creating a layered IP landscape. The '003 patent likely acts as foundational or core IP, around which subsequent patents on specific derivatives, formulations, or methods are built.


Legal and Strategic Significance

Patent Term and Life Cycle

Being granted in 2001, the patent typically expires around 2021–2022, barring any patent term adjustments. Its expiration opens the market for generics unless supplementary patents (e.g., for formulations or methods) extend exclusivity.

Claim scope impact

  • Broader claims can preclude generic entry for a wide class of compounds.
  • Narrower claims might leave room for competitors to develop alternative molecules or formulations within the patent's territory.

Potential patent challenges

Given the era and scope, the patent likely faced validity challenges based on prior art in the field of similar chemical compounds. Patent owners might have sought to reinforce its scope through continuation applications or supplemental patents.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Prior Art and Patent Family

The '003 patent appears as part of a broader portfolio, likely including:

  • Parent and continuation applications that refine or broadens claims.
  • Related patents covering improved formulations, new therapeutic uses, or resistance management.

Overlap with industry patents

Competitors or licensees often file patents on structurally similar compounds or alternative delivery methods, leading to a dense landscape that influences freedom-to-operate (FTO).

Market implications

  • During its active life, the patent likely served as a barrier to market entry by generics.
  • Post-expiration, the landscape shifts, with opportunities for biosimilars or reformulations.

Litigation and licensing

Patent disputes may have arisen if competitors challenged the validity or scope, or if licensing agreements were pursued for commercial leverage.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical innovators leverage the scope of this patent to secure market exclusivity and attract licensing partnerships.
  • Generic manufacturers analyze the claims to develop bioequivalent products post-expiry.
  • Patent attorneys scrutinize the claim language relative to prior art to assess potential infringements or opportunities for new patents.
  • Research entities may explore derivatives outside the patent's scope to innovate around the IP barrier.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

United States Patent 6,242,003 exemplifies the strategic protection of chemical and therapeutic innovations within pharmaceutical patent law. Its claims, predominantly centered on specific chemical derivatives and therapeutic methods, demonstrate the importance of balance between broad protection and inventive specificity. The patent landscape around this IP reflects a layered ecosystem of core patents, continuations, and secondary patents that collectively influence market dynamics, R&D direction, and generic competition trajectories.

As the patent reaches its expiration, an opportunity emerges for competitors and generic companies to introduce cost-effective alternatives, provided they meticulously navigate remaining or overlapping patent rights.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of US Patent 6,242,003 centers on specific chemical derivatives and associated therapeutic applications, with claims carefully constructed to defend against design-arounds.
  • The patent landscape within this domain is complex, often involving layered filings, continuation patents, and related compositions, which collectively shape competition and market exclusivity.
  • Strategic use of broad chemical and method claims can extend patent life and licensing opportunities; however, these are vulnerable to validity challenges based on prior art.
  • Post-expiration market entry for generics hinges on precise patent landscape analyses, especially considering residual secondary patents and formulations.
  • Stakeholders must continuously monitor patent expirations, ongoing litigation, and new filings to adapt IP strategies effectively.

FAQs

1. What chemical class does Patent 6,242,003 primarily cover?
It mainly covers derivatives of a specific core chemical scaffold with therapeutic relevance, often with variable substitutions that enhance activity or stability.

2. How broad are the method claims in this patent?
Typically, method claims are limited to specific therapeutic indications and administration methods, offering targeted but not indefinite scope.

3. What is the significance of related patents in the same family?
Related patents can extend protection, cover additional derivatives or formulations, and influence the overall patent landscape''s strength.

4. How does patent expiration impact market competition?
Expiration opens the market to generic manufacturers, provided they do not infringe remaining patents, facilitating more affordable options for consumers.

5. Can competitors patent similar compounds after this patent expires?
Yes, as long as their compounds are sufficiently novel and non-obvious, they can secure patent protection post-expiry, especially if tailored to new indications or formulations.


Sources

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 6,242,003.
[2] WIPO Patent Database. Patent family and related filings.
[3] Drug patent law review articles and chemical patent analysis reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,242,003

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,242,003

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2001262196 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 6219601 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 0109943 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2403591 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 100457102 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.