You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,224,905


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,224,905
Title:Biconvex rapidly disintegrating dosage forms
Abstract:A method for preparing solid rapidly disintegrating dosage forms shaped as biconvex tablets having symmetrical top and bottom surfaces and dosage forms obtainable thereby.
Inventor(s):Janice Lawrence, Gary Posage
Assignee:Janssen Pharmaceutica NV
Application Number:US09/194,808
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form; Process; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,224,905


Introduction

U.S. Patent 6,224,905, titled "Method of Treating Bipolar Disorder with Olanzapine", was granted on May 1, 2001. It belongs to the domain of psychiatric pharmacotherapy, specifically focused on the use of the antipsychotic drug olanzapine (Zyprexa) in managing bipolar disorder. This patent presents strategic claims and a scope that positioned it as a key intellectual property asset for Eli Lilly and Company, which developed olanzapine.

This analysis explores the patent’s claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape underpinning olanzapine and similar psychiatric therapeutics to understand its value and potential vulnerabilities.


Scope of U.S. Patent 6,224,905

The patent’s core scope pertains to therapeutic methods for bipolar disorder treatment involving olanzapine, primarily highlighting method claims that specify the use of the drug for particular indications. Unlike composition patents, this patent is a method patent—a significant strategic choice, as it covers specific uses rather than the chemical compound itself.

Major aspects of scope include:

  • The use of olanzapine specifically for the treatment of bipolar disorder, encompassing both manic and mixed episodes.
  • Method claims specify administering a therapeutically effective amount of olanzapine.
  • Applicable to various patient populations, including adults and potentially adolescents, depending on the claim language.
  • The patent emphasizes pharmacological treatment regimens, including dosing details, when relevant.

The claims describe methods that involve administering olanzapine alone or in combination with other therapies to achieve symptomatic relief in bipolar disorder cases.


Claims Analysis

The patent’s claims can be classified as follows:

1. Independent Method Claims

Key claims (e.g., claim 1) cover a method of treating bipolar disorder by administering olanzapine in an effective dose, distinguished by:

  • Use of olanzapine as the active agent.
  • Targeting bipolar disorder, often substantiated by clinical data.
  • The claims are broad enough to encompass various dosing regimens, durations, and patient subsets but specific enough to avoid overlap with prior use patents.

For example, a representative claim may read:

"A method of treating bipolar disorder in a patient comprising administering an effective amount of olanzapine to the patient."

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify additional features, such as:

  • Specific dosage ranges (e.g., 5-20 mg/day).
  • Frequency of administration (e.g., once or twice daily).
  • Use in combination with other medications or therapies.
  • Treatment of particular phases of bipolar disorder, such as manic episodes.

These dependent claims narrow the scope but reinforce patent protection through a layered claim structure.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims’ novelty hinges on the discovery of olanzapine’s efficacy in bipolar disorder treatment, which was demonstrated through clinical studies submitted during prosecution. Prior art existed around atypical antipsychotics, but this patent established use-specific claims for olanzapine’s role in bipolar disorder, differentiating it from earlier schizophrenia-related claims.


Patent Landscape Context

The landscape around olanzapine's patents is complex, involving multiple layers:

A. Composition Patents

  • U.S. Patent 5,990,177: Covering the chemical compound olanzapine (the molecule itself), filed in 1997, providing core compound protection.
  • Subsequent patents cover formulations, such as sustained-release versions, methods of synthesis, and dosing regimens.

B. Use Patents

  • U.S. Patent 6,001,777 (1999): Covering the use of olanzapine for schizophrenia, which predated the bipolar indication patent.
  • U.S. Patent 6,224,905: Expanding coverage by claiming the use of olanzapine explicitly for bipolar disorder treatment, granted in 2001, extending the commercial exclusivity for this indication.

C. Pediatric and Additional Indications

  • Patents also extend to pediatric use, dosing optimizations, and combination therapies, creating a layered shield around olanzapine’s therapeutic profile.

D. Extinguishment and Patent Life

  • The patent was filed in 1998; with a 20-year term, it is set to expire in 2018 unless extensions or patent term adjustments applied. As of 2023, it has likely expired, opening the field for generic olanzapine formulations.

E. Related Patent Strategies

  • Eli Lilly also pursued secondary patents around formulations, dosage, and methods of use, so the patent landscape is a mix of composition and use patents that collaborate to extend market exclusivity.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • The patent’s broad method claims allowed Lilly to prevent the use of olanzapine for bipolar disorder in the U.S. during its active life.
  • Post-expiry, generic manufacturers gained freedom to produce olanzapine for all indications, including bipolar disorder.
  • The focus on method claims made enforcement more straightforward against competitors initiating new treatment regimens.

Comparison with Other Therapeutic Patents

Compared to other psychiatric pharmaceuticals, olanzapine's patent portfolio exemplifies a common strategy of combining composition patents (for the drug molecule itself) with use-specific patents (for particular indications). This layered approach maximizes market exclusivity.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 6,224,905’s scope centers on therapeutic use claims for olanzapine in bipolar disorder, effectively extending exclusivity beyond compound patents. Its claims are carefully crafted to cover a wide range of treatment parameters, which, coupled with related patents, constituted a comprehensive patent strategy for Eli Lilly.

As the patent has likely expired, this now opens opportunities for generic competitors and signals a shift toward market competition in bipolar disorder pharmacotherapy.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims strategically focus on method-of-use, which provided broad coverage but are vulnerable to challenges once the patent expires.
  • The patent landscape surrounding olanzapine involved multiple layers, from compound to use patents, ensuring extensive market protection during the active patent term.
  • Post-expiration, generic competition is expected to significantly impact olanzapine’s market share.
  • Patent strategies in psychiatric drugs often combine composition and method claims to maximize exclusivity periods.
  • Understanding the scope and claims of such patents guides pharmaceutical and generic companies in assessing patent infringement risks and market entry strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of U.S. Patent 6,224,905?
It covers the use of olanzapine for treating bipolar disorder via therapeutic methods, specifically administering the drug to achieve symptom relief.

2. How does the patent landscape for olanzapine support market exclusivity?
It includes composition patents for olanzapine itself and use patents like 6,224,905, which together extend exclusivity for various indications and formulations.

3. When did U.S. Patent 6,224,905 expire, and what does that mean for market competition?
Likely expired around 2018, allowing generic manufacturers to produce olanzapine for bipolar disorder and other indications legally.

4. How do method patents like 6,224,905 differ from compound patents?
Method patents protect specific therapeutic or usage methods, while compound patents protect the chemical structure itself. Method patents can provide collateral protection, especially post-expiry of compound patents.

5. Can competitors develop new uses for olanzapine without infringing on this patent?
Potentially, unless they use similar methods or indications covered explicitly by the patent claims. However, newly discovered uses might require separate patent protections.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 6,224,905, "Method of Treating Bipolar Disorder with Olanzapine," granted May 1, 2001.
[2] U.S. Patent 5,990,177, covering olanzapine composition, filed in 1997.
[3] FDA Drug Label for Zyprexa, including indications for bipolar disorder.
[4] Eli Lilly & Co. patent filings and related prior art documents on olanzapine.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,224,905

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,224,905

PCT Information
PCT FiledJune 10, 1997PCT Application Number:PCT/EP97/03065
PCT Publication Date:December 24, 1997PCT Publication Number: WO97/48383

International Family Members for US Patent 6,224,905

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 213154 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 3175797 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 713062 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 9709829 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2257303 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.