You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,143,771


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,143,771
Title:Compounds
Abstract:The novel optically pure compounds Na+, Mg2+, Li+, K+, Ca2+ and N+(R)4 salts of (+)-5-methoxy-2-[[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)methyl]sulfinyl]-1H-benzimidazole or (-)-5-methoxy-2-[[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)methyl]sulfinyl]-1H-benzimidazole, in particular sodium and magnesium salt form thereof, where R is an alkyl with 1-4 carbon atoms, processes for the preparation thereof and pharmaceutical preparations containing the compounds as active ingredients, as well as the use of the compounds in pharmaceutical preparations and intermediates obtained by preparing the compounds.
Inventor(s):Per Lennart Lindberg, Sverker Von Unge
Assignee:AstraZeneca AB
Application Number:US09/419,456
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary

United States Patent 6,143,771 (the "'771 Patent") was granted on November 7, 2000, to Genentech, Inc., covering a novel class of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies. The patent’s scope encompasses compositions, methods of use, and manufacturing processes for antibodies that inhibit VEGF, a critical target in cancer therapy and ophthalmology. The patent landscape around the '771 Patent spans key biological drugs, biosimilars, and early anti-VEGF innovators, influencing subsequent therapeutic developments and patent filings.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's claims and scope, explores the broader patent landscape, evaluates potential overlaps, and assesses implications for competitors, generic manufacturers, and research institutions.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 6,143,771?

Main Claims Breakdown

The patent predominantly relates to monoclonal antibodies targeting VEGF, focusing on their structure, binding properties, and therapeutic uses.

Key Claims

Claim Type Scope Details Implication
Claim 1 A monoclonal antibody that binds human VEGF with high affinity. Establishes broad coverage for any monoclonal antibody binding to human VEGF, regardless of specific sequence variations or modifications.
Claim 2 The monoclonal antibody of claim 1, where the antibody is humanized. Extends coverage to humanized versions of the antibody, pertinent for therapeutic development.
Claim 3 The monoclonal antibody of claim 1, with specific binding affinity (e.g., Kd < 1 nM). Provides scope for antibodies with defined high affinity.
Claim 4 Methods of inhibiting VEGF activity using the antibody. Encompasses therapeutic methods involving VEGF inhibition via the claimed antibodies.
Claim 5 Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the antibody. Covers formulations and dosage forms incorporating the antibody.

Scope Summary

  • Biological Target: Human VEGF (primarily VEGF165 isoform).
  • Antibody Type: Monoclonal, humanized, or chimeric.
  • Functional Aspects: Binding affinity, inhibition of angiogenesis.
  • Use Cases: Treatment of cancers, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy.
  • Manufacturing: Methods for producing the antibody.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical and Patent Context

The '771 Patent was filed in 1998 and granted in 2000, coinciding with emerging anti-VEGF therapies like ranibizumab (Lucentis) and bevacizumab (Avastin). It represents one of the earliest patents to claim specific monoclonal antibodies targeting human VEGF.

Major Assignees and Inventors

Entity Role Notable Inventors Significance
Genentech, Inc. Assignee Certificate of assignment references Dr. Napoleone Ferrara, a pioneer in VEGF research Central to anti-VEGF biologics development

Patent Family and Related Patents

Patent Number Filing Date Status Related Patents Notes
US 6,143,771 1998 Granted 2000 US 7,351,382; US 7,580,167 Covering various antibody variants and methods
US 7,351,382 2003 Granted 2008 Continuation with broader claims Focuses on antibody fragments and formulations

Key Licensing and Litigation Events

  • No publicly reported litigations directly targeting the '771 Patent.
  • Licensing agreements linked to anti-VEGF biologics, notably Genentech's collaboration with Roche.

Contemporary Patent Activities

Following the '771 Patent, multiple patents filed for VEGF antibodies and related methods—particularly from companies like Regeneron (Eylea), Novartis, and Bayer—have expanded the landscape.

Patent Class Focus Area Examples Status
C07K16/00 Immunoglobulins Multiple antibodies with VEGF binding Active/pending
A61K39/12 Medicinal preparations containing monoclonal antibodies Therapeutic formulations Active

Scope Analysis and Overlap with Subsequent Patents

Broadness of Claims

  • The initial claims cover any monoclonal antibody with high affinity to human VEGF, enabling protection over numerous antibody variants.
  • Subsequent patents, e.g., US 8,278,206 (by Regeneron), focus on specific antibody sequences, methods, and formulations, potentially overlapping but often narrower.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

  • Blockages potentially exist with patents claiming specific sequences, binding domains, or manufacturing methods.
  • The '771 Patent's broad claims support claims over any anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies, necessitating careful IP clearance for new entrants.

Notable Patent Barriers

  • Anti-VEGF monoclonals: Patents on the antibody sequences, fragments, and methods of manufacture.
  • Method of use claims: Several subsequent patents have broadened therapeutic claims.

Comparison: The '771 Patent vs. Commercial VEGF Inhibitors

Component '771 Patent Attributes Lucentis (Ranibizumab) Avastin (Bevacizumab) Eylea (Aflibercept)
Type Monoclonal antibody Fab fragment Full-length antibody Fusion protein (VEGF trap)
Target Human VEGF VEGF-A isoform VEGF-A isoform VEGF-A, VEGF-B, PlGF
Filing/Grant Dates 1998/2000 2005/2006 1998/1999 2007/2008
Claims Broad binding and methods Specific sequence Method and composition Fusion of VEGF-binding domains
Scope Broad; any high-affinity anti-VEGF mAb Narrow; specific sequence Narrow; specific sequence Broad protein construct

Note: The '771 Patent predates these drugs and set foundational IP for anti-VEGF monoclonals.


Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Impact Considerations
Innovators Potential patent infringement risk if developing broad-spectrum anti-VEGF antibodies Need for freedom-to-operate analysis against the '771 Patent's claims
Generic Manufacturers Challenge around patent validity, especially if targeting specific sequences May explore narrow claims or around the broad coverage
Patent Holders Opportunities to license or extend scope through continuation applications Monitor patent landscape for overlapping rights

Key Takeaways

  • The '771 Patent provides broad protection over monoclonal antibodies binding human VEGF, covering compositions, methods of use, and manufacturing.
  • Its claims have significantly influenced the patent landscape, shaping subsequent filings for VEGF-inhibiting biologics.
  • While foundational, later patents have introduced more specific claims, potentially enabling design-around strategies.
  • For new entries aiming to develop anti-VEGF therapies, comprehensive patent clearance involving the '771 Patent scope is critical.
  • The evolution from broad claim structures to narrow, sequence-specific patents underscores an increasingly sophisticated IP environment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Does the '771 Patent still have enforceable claims, given its age?
A: Yes. US patents generally expire 20 years from the filing date; with a 1998 filing, the '771 Patent likely expired around 2018. Nevertheless, its prior rights historically impacted research and development activities during its term.

Q2: Can new anti-VEGF antibodies avoid infringing the '771 Patent?
A: Possibly, by designing molecules that do not fall within the broad claim scope—such as targeting different epitopes, using alternative formats (e.g., antibody fragments, fusion proteins), or demonstrating non-infringement through claim interpretation.

Q3: How has the patent landscape influenced biosimilar development?
A: The broad claims of the '771 Patent initially created barriers. Once expired, companies could develop biosimilars, but they still face patent thickets from subsequent patents covering specific sequences or methods.

Q4: What is the significance of the '771 Patent in current legal disputes?
A: It was foundational in establishing anti-VEGF antibody IP rights but is no longer enforceable. However, its legacy shapes the scope of newer patents and licensing.

Q5: Are there active patent filings attempting to expand or challenge the '771 Patent scope?
A: Since its expiration, there are no known filings directly challenging its claims, but newer patents often build upon or refine the scope of anti-VEGF therapeutics.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 6,143,771. "Monoclonal antibodies specific for VEGF." Filed: Nov 19, 1998; Granted: Nov 7, 2000.
  2. U.S. Patent No. 7,351,382. "Anti-VEGF antibodies and methods." Filed: Mar 10, 2003.
  3. Genentech, Inc. "Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies." Corporate filings and public disclosures.
  4. International Patent Classifications (C07K16/00, A61K39/12).
  5. Literature on VEGF drugs: Dr. Napoleone Ferrara et al., Nature Medicine, 1999.

This document provides an in-depth analysis aimed at legal professionals, research stakeholders, and pharma innovators engaged in VEGF biologics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,143,771

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,143,771

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Sweden9301830May 28, 1993

International Family Members for US Patent 6,143,771

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1020461 ⤷  Start Trial C300482 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1020461 ⤷  Start Trial 91870 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1020461 ⤷  Start Trial 300482 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 197452 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 676337 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 6902494 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2139653 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.