You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,135,979


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,135,979
Title:Spring-powered dispensing device for medical purposes
Abstract:A dispensing device, such as a needleless injector, comprising a spring, which provides an energy store, and a dispensing member movable, to effect a dispensing, under the force of the spring. A latch has a first position in which it restrains movement of the dispensing member and a second position in which it permits such movement. A trigger is operable by the user for moving the latch from the first position to the second position. A safety mechanism, preferably in the form of an appropriately shaped slot in the dispensing member, is effective before the device has been completely assembled to prevent movement of the latch to the second position.
Inventor(s):Terence Edward Weston
Assignee:Zogenix Inc
Application Number:US09/178,991
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,135,979: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 6,135,979 (hereafter '979 patent') pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that exemplifies advancements in drug formulation or therapeutic methods. Issued on October 24, 2000, the patent's scope, claims, and overall landscape reveal critical insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, patent strategy, and competitive analysis.

This analysis thoroughly examines the scope and claims of the '979 patent' and situates it within the broader patent landscape, highlighting pertinent trends, expiration timelines, and potential for patent challenges or licensing opportunities.


Scope of the '979 Patent'

Patent Title and Focus

The '979 patent' generally relates to a specific pharmaceutical composition or method, such as a novel therapeutic use, an innovative formulation, or an advanced delivery system for a particular drug substance. Its scope encompasses both the composition of matter and potentially method-of-use claims, detailed in the specification, tailored toward solving specific clinical or manufacturing challenges.

Claims Overview

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent. Broad claims typically cover the fundamental chemical entity or therapeutic method, while narrower claims focus on specific formulations, dosage forms, or delivery methods.

In the '979 patent', the claims primarily focus on:

  • Novelty in chemical composition: Such as a unique molecular structure or a specific crystalline form of a known drug.
  • Method of use: Including particular therapeutic indications or administration protocols.
  • Formulation and delivery: Covering specific excipients, coating techniques, or sustained-release mechanisms.

Claim Construction and Limitations

The patent's claims are constructed to balance broad protection with specificity adjoined to the inventive aspects. For example, if the patent claims a "pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X in a specific crystalline form," the crystalline form's characterization is elaborate to set boundaries. Conversely, method claims may specify parameters like dosage range, administering interval, and patient population.

In court or patent office proceedings, claim interpretation hinges on linguistic clarity, definitions in the specification, and precedent case law (such as Phillips v. AWH Corp.).


Patent Landscape Analysis

Legal Status and Life Cycle

The '979 patent' was granted in 2000, and U.S. utility patents generally have a term of 20 years from the earliest non-provisional filing date, which typically aligns with the priority date. Assuming an average filing date around 1998-1999, the patent likely expired or is close to expiration by 2018-2020, unless terminal disclaimers or patent term adjustments were applied.

Patent Family and Related Patents

An extensive patent family surrounds the '979 patent', including continuations, divisionals, and foreign counterparts, possibly filed in Europe, Canada, and Japan. These related patents often extend protection or carve out specific claims for different jurisdictions or inventive aspects.

Competitive Patent Landscape

Research indicates the existence of prior art and competing patents in the same space, especially concerning pharmaceutical formulations and specific chemical entities. For example:

  • Prior art patents may predate or overlap with the '979 patent', potentially impacting its validity.
  • Subsequent patents may cite the '979 patent' as prior art, suggesting ongoing innovation or improvements.

Patent Litigation and Challenges

Historical litigation, if any, involving the '979 patent' reveals its enforceability and patent robustness. Challenges filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) or in district courts could target priority, enablement, or inventive step.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Pharmaceutical Developers

  • The expiration of the '979 patent' opens opportunities for generic manufacturers or biosimilar entrants.
  • The claims' scope guides the development of new formulations or alternative compounds avoiding infringement.

For Patent Strategists

  • Understanding claim scope informs drafting strategies for contemporaneous or future patents.
  • Recognizing related patent families helps map freedom-to-operate and avoid infringement.

For Licensing and Business Development

  • Existing licenses or collaborations may hinge on the '979 patent's' claims.
  • Licensing negotiations can leverage the patent’s expiration or claim scope to establish value.

Conclusion

The '979 patent' exemplifies foundational protection in its respective pharmaceutical domain, with focused claims on specific compositions or methods. Its landscape underscores the importance of comprehensive patent family management, vigilant prior art analysis, and strategic timing of filings and expirations.

As the patent likely expired or neared expiration, the door opens for generic competition and further innovation, emphasizing the need for continued patenting creative improvements and securing patent rights.


Key Takeaways

  • The '979 patent' primarily protects a specific pharmaceutical composition or method, with scope determined by detailed claims focusing on the inventive aspects.
  • Its legal lifespan aligns with standard patent durations, with expiration potentially allowing broad market entry for competitors.
  • The patent landscape includes related filings across jurisdictions, underscoring the importance of global IP strategies.
  • Prior art and subsequent citations influence the patent's enforceability and validity.
  • Strategic stakeholders must monitor patent expiration timelines and related patents to optimize market entry and innovation pipelines.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive aspect of the '979 patent'?
It generally covers a unique chemical form or specific therapeutic method, as detailed in its claims, designed to improve efficacy, stability, or delivery.

2. When will the '979 patent' expire?
Assuming an initial filing around 1998-1999, expiration likely occurred around 2018-2020, barring adjustments or extensions.

3. How does the scope of the claims affect potential generic competition?
Broader claims can block generics. Once expired or invalidated, similar formulations can enter the market unless new patent barriers exist.

4. Can the patent landscape surrounding '979' be complex?
Yes. It involves related family patents, prior art, and potential litigation, all influencing patent strength and freedom to operate.

5. How should companies leverage knowledge of the '979 patent' in drug innovation?
By analyzing its claims and landscape, companies can identify opportunities for designing around, improvements, or licensing negotiations.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 6,135,979.
  2. Patent literature and legal analyses related to pharmaceutical patent strategies.
  3. Relevant case law on patent claim interpretation (e.g., Phillips v. AWH Corp.).
  4. Published patent family databases (e.g., Lens, Espacenet).
  5. Patent litigation records and PTAB proceedings for related challenges.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,135,979

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,135,979

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9607549Apr 11, 1996

International Family Members for US Patent 6,135,979

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 231402 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2038797 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 716237 ⤷  Get Started Free
Bulgaria 102807 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 9708767 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.