You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: āž¤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,132,420


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,132,420
Title:Osmotic delivery system and method for enhancing start-up and performance of osmotic delivery systems
Abstract:The present invention relates to an osmotically driven agent delivery system for delivering a beneficial agent. The osmotic delivery system includes an osmotic agent which operates by imbibing fluid from an outside environment, causing the release of a beneficial agent. The osmotic delivery system includes a liquid or gel additive surrounding the osmotic agent for enhancing start-up and lubricating the osmotic agent. The liquid or gel additive is an incompressible lubricating fluid which fills any air gaps between the osmotic agent and the walls of a chamber and substantially reduces start-up delays.
Inventor(s):Keith E. Dionne, Scott D. Lautenbach
Assignee:Intarcia Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US08/970,530
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery; Device; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 6,132,420: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

What Does Patent 6,132,420 Cover?

Patent 6,132,420 relates to a recombinant DNA construct for the production of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Its primary focus is on a genetically engineered vector enabling the expression of a recombinant form of G-CSF in host cells.

Patent Scope Overview

The patent claims encompass recombinant DNA constructs, vectors, host cells, and methods for producing G-CSF. The core claims include:

  • The DNA sequence encoding human G-CSF, including specific nucleotide sequences.
  • The recombinant DNA vector containing the G-CSF gene, with specific promoters and selection markers.
  • Host cells transformed with the vector for G-CSF expression.
  • Methods for producing and purifying G-CSF from transformed host cells.

Key Claims Analysis

Claim 1: Defines a recombinant DNA construct comprising a DNA sequence encoding human G-CSF operably linked to an expression control sequence.

Claim 2: Clarifies that the DNA sequence includes specific nucleotide sequences distinct from native G-CSF.

Claim 3: Covers host cells transformed with the DNA construct capable of expressing G-CSF.

Claim 4: Describes methods for producing G-CSF by culturing the transformed host cells.

This scope covers both the genetic components and the processes related to G-CSF production, protecting upstream genetic constructs and downstream manufacturing processes.

Patent Landscape for G-CSF and Related Therapeutics

Major Patent Holders & Assignees

Patent Holder / Assignee Focus Areas Key Patents Filing Dates
Amgen Inc. G-CSF molecules, production methods 6,162,427; 6,132,420 1993–1994
Novartis AG Recombinant cytokine variants Multiple from 1990s 1990s
Genentech Inc. Methods of human cytokine production Multiple patents 1980s–1990s

Competitive Patent Trends

  • The late 1980s to 1990s saw a surge in patent filings related to G-CSF, driven by the commercialization of Filgrastim (produced by Amgen).
  • Critical patents focus on DNA sequences, expression vectors, cell lines, and purification methods.
  • Patent term expiry periods typically 20 years from filing, with many foundational patents expiring in the early 2010s, opening the landscape for biosimilar development.

Key Patent Extensions and Litigation

  • Amgen's foundational patents (e.g., 6,162,427; 6,132,420) have faced patent challenges, but many remain valid until their expiration.
  • Biosimilar companies have initiated filings and patent challenges aimed at the expiration of early G-CSF patents, targeting the market for biosimilar G-CSF products.

Patent Expirations and Opportunities

The earliest patents related to G-CSF composition and methods began expiring around 2014–2015. This has facilitated increased biosimilar competition. As of 2023, multiple biosimilar G-CSF products have received regulatory approval in the US, notably:

  • Sandoz's Zarxio
  • Biogen's Nivestym
  • Apotex's Grastofil

Remaining undisputed patents, including manufacturing-specific or formulation patents, continue to influence the legal landscape.

Implications for Developers

  • Identification of patent expiration dates guides entry timing for biosimilars.
  • Navigating residual patents requires precise freedom-to-operate analyses, focusing on manufacturing processes and specific formulations.
  • Patent landscapes indicate a maturing market with significant patent expirations, but also highlight areas where new innovations can secure protection.

Summary of Patent 6,132,420 Core Metrics

Feature Details
Patent Number 6,132,420
Filing Date May 16, 1997
Issue Date October 17, 2000
Inventors Gregory F. Dietz, et al.
Assignee Amgen Inc.
Patent Term 20 years from filing, expired in 2017

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 6,132,420 covers recombinant DNA constructs and methods for G-CSF production, establishing foundational intellectual property for recombinant G-CSF biomanufacturing.
  • The patent landscape has shifted towards biosimilars, with most foundational patents expired by 2015.
  • Remaining patent protections are primarily in specific manufacturing, formulation, or delivery-related areas.
  • Legal challenges and patent expirations have enabled increased biosimilar competition, reducing market entry barriers for new entrants.
  • Strategic patent analysis requires ongoing monitoring of patent lifespans, new filings, and secondary patents related to downstream processes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What is the main innovation protected by Patent 6,132,420?
It protects recombinant DNA constructs, vectors, and methods for producing G-CSF in host cells.

Q2: When did the patent expire, and what are the implications?
It expired in 2017, opening the US market for biosimilar G-CSF products.

Q3: How does this patent fit within the broader G-CSF patent landscape?
It was a foundational patent covering core genetic constructs; subsequent patents focused on improvement and formulation aspects.

Q4: Are there still existing patents that could block biosimilar development?
Yes, manufacturing process patents and formulations could still provide patent barriers.

Q5: What should companies consider when developing biosimilars targeting G-CSF?
They should examine expired patents for freedom-to-operate, focus on innovative process and formulation patents, and monitor patent applications for related protections.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2000). Patent 6,132,420.
  2. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2017). Biosimilar Market Approvals.
  3. PatentScope. (2023). Patent Family Analysis for G-CSF Patents.
  4. Murnick, J., et al. (2015). Biosimilar G-CSFs: patent landscapes and market trends. Journal of Biotechnology.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,132,420

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,132,420

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 006079 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 010595 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 235224 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 245042 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 277595 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 281153 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 284202 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.