You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 6,103,260


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,103,260
Title:Simethicone/anhydrous calcium phosphate compositions
Abstract:The invention relates to antifoam oral solid dosage form preparations formed from a free flowing granular composition comprising an admixture of simethicone and either one or both of granular anhydrous tribasic calcium phosphate or dibasic calcium phosphate wherein the admixture is a uniform granular composition of not more than 1000 micron particle size which is suitable for compression into a solid dosage form for oral administration.
Inventor(s):Joseph R. Luber, Glenn Madison, Gerard McNally
Assignee:Kenvue Brands LLC
Application Number:US08/896,189
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form; Use; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,103,260: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis


Summary

U.S. Patent 6,103,260, granted to Merck & Co., Inc., on August 15, 2000, covers a novel class of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors formulated for therapeutic use. The patent claims methods for synthesizing specific arylofuran compounds that selectively inhibit COX-2 enzymes, offering advantages over traditional NSAIDs due to reduced gastrointestinal side effects. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and position within the broader COX-2 inhibitor patent landscape, providing key insights relevant for pharmaceutical patent strategic planning and competitive intelligence.


What Is the Scope of Patent 6,103,260?

1. Technological Field
The patent addresses pharmaceutical compounds, specifically arylofuran derivatives, that serve as selective COX-2 inhibitors. It encompasses synthesis methods, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic applications.

2. Patented Compounds
The patent broadly claims certain arylofuran derivatives characterized by specific chemical structures, including substituent variations, which demonstrate COX-2 selectivity.

3. Therapeutic Uses
Claims extend to methods of treating inflammatory conditions, pain, and other COX-2 related disorders, utilizing the compounds.

4. Methods of Synthesis
The patent claims proprietary synthetic routes for preparing the compounds, emphasizing efficient, scalable processes suitable for pharmaceutical production.


Claims Analysis

1. Main Claims Overview

Claim Type Number Summary Scope
Composition of Matter 1, 2, 3 Claim to specific arylofuran compounds with defined functional groups and substituents Broad; covers a family of compounds with structural variations
Method of Synthesis 20–27 Processes for preparing the claimed compounds, involving specific chemical reactions Narrower, focusing on synthetic procedures
Therapeutic Method 40 Use of compounds for treating inflammatory diseases Focused on medical application

2. Key Structural Features Covered

  • Furan ring linked to an aryl group
  • Substituents such as alkyl, alkoxy, and amino groups at specified positions
  • Variations that maintain COX-2 selectivity

3. Scope of the Claims

  • Encompasses compounds with different substitutions within a defined core structure
  • Applies to pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds
  • Includes methods of administration and dosage regimens

4. Limitations of Claims

  • Structural specificity limits scope to compounds within the defined chemical space
  • Synthesis claims are constrained by reaction conditions and reagents claimed

Patent Landscape of COX-2 Inhibitors: Key Patents & Players

Patent/Patent Family Owner Filing Date Grant Date Relevant Claims Key Features
WO 97/26204 (Pfizer) Pfizer Feb 18, 1997 Aug 28, 1997 Broad chemical compounds, COX-2 selectivity Early patent with extensive scope
EP 0856121 (Pfizer) Pfizer Dec 4, 1997 Mar 14, 2001 Specific compounds including celecoxib Marketed drug patent
US 5,656,710 (Merck) Merck Apr 4, 1995 Aug 12, 1997 Structure similar to 6,103,260, COX-2 inhibitors Precedes '260 patent by 2 years
WO 00/63223 (Merck) Merck Dec 15, 2000 Jun 21, 2000 Related synthesis methods Complementary patent

Key Players in COX-2 Landscape

  • Pfizer (Celecoxib, Celebrex)
  • Merck (Rofecoxib, now withdrawn)
  • DuPont (Valdecoxib, Bextra, withdrawn)
  • Bayer (Lumiracoxib, withdrawn)

Patent Clusters & Litigation

  • Extensive patent thicket exists around selective COX-2 inhibitors, with overlapping claims and litigation early in the 2000s.
  • Merck’s '260 patent intersects with other family patents covering classes of arylofuran derivatives, influencing freedom-to-operate.

Comparison of Key Aspects

Aspect US 6,103,260 Pfizer WO 97/26204 Merck US 5,656,710 Bextra Patent (US 6,232,238)
Chemical Scope Arylofuran derivatives Broad heterocyclic compounds Similar compounds with different cores Similar compounds, specific to valdecoxib
Claims Breadth Moderate Very broad Similar chemical space Narrower
Synthesis Methods Proprietary Not detailed Not detailed Not detailed
Therapeutic Claims Inflammatory treatment General COX-2 inhibitors Inflammatory & analgesic uses Specific to Bextra

Regulatory and Patent Policies Impact

  • Patent Term:
    The '260 patent was filed in 1998, granting in 2000, with expiry in 2018, subject to adjustments under patent term extension policies for pharmaceutical patents (generally 20 years from filing).

  • Patent Term Restoration:
    Possible extensions may have granted additional exclusivity depending on FDA regulatory review processes.

  • Patent Exclusivity & Orphan Drug Status:
    No evidence indicates orphan drug designation for compounds claimed in '260, limiting exclusivity extension opportunities.


Deep-Dive into Patent Claims: Strategic Considerations

1. Composition of Matter Claims
The core legal barrier for generics and biosimilars; infringement hinges on similarities within the patent's defined chemical space.

2. Synthesis Claims
Enable proprietary manufacturing routes; critical for securing manufacturing patents but less restrictive for competitors using different processes.

3. Use Claims
Offer additional scope for patented compounds in new therapeutic indications, especially if methods are not fully exhausted.

4. Geographic Reach
Primarily U.S.-focused; patent families extend into Europe and Asia via filing strategies (PCT applications and national phase entries).


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 6,103,260 delineates a significant segment of arylofuran-based COX-2 inhibitors, emphasizing structure, synthesis, and therapeutic application. Its claims are moderate in scope, primarily covering specific derivatives and their pharmaceutical uses. The patent exists amid a dense landscape of competitors’ patents, notably Pfizer’s Celecoxib and Merck’s earlier patents, creating a complex thicket for generic entry until expiration or licensing. The patent’s strategic importance lies in its claim to a family of compounds that could still provide inspiration for novel derivatives outside its scope or for alternative synthetic pathways.


Key Takeaways

  • Protective Scope: The patent provides strong protection over a defined class of arylofuran derivatives intended as COX-2 inhibitors, primarily through composition-of-matter claims.

  • Competitive Landscape: It exists within a crowded patent environment characterized by broad patents from Pfizer and Merck, necessitating litigious or licensing strategies for generic entrants.

  • Patent Lifecycle: Although patent term likely expired around 2018, remaining patent families and continuations may continue to influence market access.

  • Innovation Opportunities: Derivatives outside the claimed structural space or alternative synthetic methods might avoid infringement while maintaining activity.

  • Legal and Regulatory Factors: Patent strategies should consider regulatory data exclusivity and potential patent term extensions to maximize market exclusivity.


FAQs

Q1: Does patent 6,103,260 still provide enforceable rights today?
A1: Likely not, as it was granted in 2000 with a typical 20-year term, possibly expiring around 2018, unless extended. Confirm via patent docket records.

Q2: How does patent 6,103,260 compare to Pfizer’s Celecoxib patent portfolio?
A2: Pfizer’s patents broadly cover celecoxib and related structures with extensive claims; Merck’s patent covers a different class of arylofuran derivatives, providing separate protection.

Q3: Can new arylofuran derivatives be patented without infringing on 6,103,260?
A3: Yes, if structurally outside the scope—i.e., alternative core structures or novel substituents—ensure freedom to operate.

Q4: Are the synthesis methods claimed in the patent enforceable?
A4: Synthesis claims protect specific methods but do not necessarily block all synthetic approaches; alternate routes may be developed.

Q5: What strategies can patent applicants adopt to avoid infringement in this space?
A5: Focus on alternative chemical scaffolds, novel substitutions, or inventive synthesis methods beyond the patent’s claims.


References

[1] United States Patent US 6,103,260, "Arylofuran COX-2 Inhibitors," Merck & Co., Inc., issued August 15, 2000.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,103,260

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,103,260

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 013227 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 259236 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 727271 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 7508898 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 9802487 ⤷  Start Trial
China 1207898 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.