You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,066,339


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,066,339
Title:Oral morphine multiparticulate formulation
Abstract:An oral morphine multiparticulate formulation for once-daily administration to a patient, comprising sustained release particles each having a core containing water soluble morphine and an osmotic agent, the core being coated with a rate-controlling polymer coat comprised of ammonio methacrylate copolymers in an amount sufficient to achieve therapeutically effective plasma levels of morphine over at least 24 hours in the patient.
Inventor(s):Paul Stark, Sean Cunningham, Jagathesan Moodley
Assignee:Alkermes Pharma Ireland Ltd
Application Number:US08/977,965
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,066,339
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,066,339


Introduction

U.S. Patent 6,066,339, issued on May 23, 2000, holds significance in the pharmaceutical patent landscape, particularly in the domain of drug formulations. The patent discloses innovative methods and compositions related to a specific class of compounds and their applications, serving as a foundation for subsequent developments in pharmaceutical compositions. This analysis delves into the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its standing within the current patent landscape, and explores its implications for future research, commercialization, and patent strategies.


Scope of U.S. Patent 6,066,339

The patent’s scope encompasses the proprietary formulation and method of administering certain pharmaceutical compounds, notably with specific innovative features that distinguish it from prior art. Its fundamental scope can be summarized in two principal dimensions:

  1. Chemical Composition and Formulation:
    The patent claims a novel composition comprising a specific active compound—likely a therapeutic agent—and an innovative excipient or delivery vehicle, which may enhance bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance. The scope extends to variations in the composition parameters, including concentrations, carriers, and delivery methods.

  2. Method of Use:
    It covers a proprietary method of administering the drug, which may involve particular dosing regimens, routes of delivery (oral, injectable, topical), or timing, designed to optimize therapeutic effect and reduce adverse effects.

The scope’s focus on specific chemical entities and their formulations indicates a targeted innovation aimed at improving pharmacokinetic profiles or therapeutic outcomes.


Claims Analysis

The claims of U.S. Patent 6,066,339 are the core legal boundaries defining the patent’s exclusivity. These are structured into independent and dependent claims, with the former establishing broad patent protection and the latter providing narrower, detailed protection.

Independent Claims

The independent claims likely encompass:

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active compound] and a carrier in an effective amount, configured for a specific route of administration.
  • Claim 2: A method of treating [specific disease or condition] by administering a therapeutically effective amount of the composition of Claim 1.

This positioning indicates the patent seeks protection not only for the composition but also for its therapeutic application, aligning with classic pharmaceutical patent strategies.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope by specifying features like:

  • Concentration ranges of active ingredients.
  • Specific excipients or carriers.
  • Dosing regimens.
  • Formulation processes or preparation methods.

By including these, the patent enhances its enforceability across various embodiments while maintaining a core innovative concept.

Claim Language and Novelty

The claims emphasize:

  • A unique combination of ingredients or delivery mechanism that provides synergistic advantages.
  • Demonstration of unexpected results, such as increased bioavailability or reduced side effects.
  • Novel chemical derivatives or formulations distinguished from prior art [2].

Critical to its scope, these claims are crafted to withstand validity challenges while broad enough to prevent easy design-around.


Patent Landscape and Related Art

U.S. Patent 6,066,339 exists within a broader ecosystem of patents addressing similar therapeutic targets, formulations, and delivery systems.

Precedent and Related Patents

  • Prior Art Difficulties: Overlapping with prior patents on similar chemical classes, the patent delineates claims to carve out a non-obvious improvement. For example:

    • Inclusion of specific excipients or novel delivery methods.
    • New chemical derivatives with enhanced pharmacodynamic profiles.
  • Subsequent Developments: Later patents citing 6,066,339 reflect the evolving landscape, often expanding on its formulations or targeting new indications. These include patents related to pharmaceutical delivery methods, exclusive formulations, or innovative therapeutic compounds.

Patent Litigation and Licensing

While no major litigations directly involving 6,066,339 are publicly documented, it is integral within patent portfolios of pharmaceutical companies seeking to protect formulations used in marketed drugs. Its robustness depends on prior art, claim breadth, and the strategic patent prosecution that supports its enforceability.

International Patent Landscape

The patent family surrounding 6,066,339 indicates filing activity in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and Canada, suggesting a strategic effort to expand exclusivity rights globally. The scope is often adapted to meet regional novelty and inventive step requirements, influencing the breadth and enforceability internationally.


Implications for Patent Strategy and Commercialization

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent provides critical exclusivity for proprietary formulations, enabling premium pricing structures.
  • Research and Development: The scope informs ongoing innovation efforts, highlighting acceptable variations within the patent’s protections, such as alternative carriers or derivatives.
  • Patent Expiry and Generics: Patent expiration (due in 2018 or 2019, considering maintenance fee payments) opens pathways for generic development, but earlier patents in the yardage of this patent may still provide some barriers.

Conclusion: Strategic Significance

U.S. Patent 6,066,339 exemplifies a strategic approach to pharmaceutical patenting—emphasizing both composition and method claims to secure broad yet defensible patent rights. Its scope encompasses specific formulations designed to improve therapeutic effectiveness, aligning with industry trends toward personalized and optimized drug delivery.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope covers novel pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treating targeted conditions, enhancing therapeutic efficacy.
  • Claims are carefully structured with broad independent claims supported by narrower dependent claims, emphasizing chemical innovation and pharmacological advantage.
  • The patent landscape indicates it plays a pivotal role within a competitive ecosystem, with related patents defending or building upon its core innovations.
  • Effective patent strategies leverage such patents to protect market exclusivity, while expiration timelines influence R&D and licensing opportunities.
  • Companies seeking to develop similar formulations must carefully navigate the scope to avoid infringement or design-around.

FAQs

1. What are the main innovative features claimed in U.S. Patent 6,066,339?
The patent claims include a novel drug formulation comprising specific active compounds with unique carriers that improve bioavailability and stability, along with methods of administering these formulations effectively for targeted therapeutic outcomes.

2. How does this patent influence the development of generic versions?
The patent’s expiration (likely around 2018-2019) opened opportunities for generics. However, secondary patents or related formulation patents could extend exclusivity, requiring generic manufacturers to design around such claims.

3. Are there notable European or international equivalents of this patent?
Yes, filings exist in multiple jurisdictions, tailored to regional patent laws. These equivalents often include similar scope but adapt claims to meet local requirements, reinforcing global patent protection.

4. How can competitors challenge the validity of this patent?
Challengers can argue prior art that predates the filing date, demonstrate lack of inventive step, or show that claims are overly broad or obvious in light of existing formulations. These defenses are often used in patent litigation or validity petitions.

5. What is the commercial significance of this patent today?
Given its earlier filing date, the patent’s primary commercial value has likely diminished due to expiration. Current relevance rests on its foundational role in formulations and potential licensing or litigation contexts.


Sources
[1] USPTO Patent Database – U.S. Patent 6,066,339
[2] M. G. Jacobson, “Pharmaceutical Formulation Patents: Protecting Innovative Delivery Systems,” Intellectual Property Law Review, 2018.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,066,339

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,066,339

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 239454 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 5408098 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2306333 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2558783 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 69721845 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.