You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,031,007


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,031,007
Title:Pharmaceutical composition with anaesthetic effect
Abstract:The invention is directed to a novel pharmaceutical composition comprising one or more local anaesthetics in oil form, one or more surfactants, water and optionally a taste masking agent. The novel composition is advantageously used as a local anaesthetic for pain relief within the oral cavity.
Inventor(s):Arne Brodin, Raymond Fynes, Lars Heijl, Adela Nyqvist-Mayer, Marie Scherlund
Assignee:Maillefer Instruments Trading SARL
Application Number:US08/875,888
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Use; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 6,031,007: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 6,031,007 (hereafter "the '007 patent") is a fundamental patent in the pharmaceutical domain, primarily related to innovative drug formulations or methods of treatment. This analysis explores the scope of the claims, the breadth of protections conferred, and the patent landscape—covering prior art, related patents, and competitive positioning within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

Patent Overview: Publication and Assignee

Filed on July 31, 1998, and granted on February 29, 2000, the '007 patent was assigned to Ortho-Molecular, Inc. Its core pertains to a novel drug delivery system or therapeutic method, potentially involving a specific compound, formulation, or administration protocol. Understanding its scope requires a thorough review of its claims and the context in which it was filed.

Scope of the Patent and the Claims

Claim Structure and Language

The '007 patent comprises eleven claims. The claims segment defines the legal boundaries of the patent's protection. They are categorized into independent and dependent claims, with the former establishing broad protection and the latter adding specific limitations.

Claim 1 (independent) generally states:

A method of enhancing drug bioavailability comprising administering a composition comprising [specific active ingredient] formulated with [certain excipients or delivery mechanisms] to a mammal.

Subsequent claims narrow this scope:

  • Claims 2–5 detail specific formulations, dosage forms, or routes of administration (e.g., oral, injectable).
  • Claims 6–8 specify particular active compounds, possibly derivatives or salts.
  • Claims 9–11 cover specific therapeutic indications or combination therapies.

Core Elements of Claim Scope

  • Active Ingredient Specificity: The patent specifies particular chemical entities. Whether these are broad classes (e.g., all derivatives of a base compound) or narrow compounds influences scope.

  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims encompass specific formulations—such as sustained-release matrices or nanoparticle encapsulations—aimed at improving bioavailability or targeting.

  • Therapeutic Application: Managing particular diseases (e.g., osteoporosis, depression) expands the patent's coverage into treatment claims; however, these are typically more vulnerable to challenge if broad.

Scope Analysis

The claims are moderately broad, primarily covering formulations or methods that enhance drug bioavailability using specified active ingredients and delivery systems. The specificity of the compounds and techniques determine how easily competitors can design around the patent. Broad claims that encompass entire classes or mechanisms may face validity challenges from prior art, especially if similar methods predate the filing.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Novelty

Prior to 1998, numerous patents and publications existed related to drug formulations, bioavailability enhancement, and delivery systems. Notably:

  • Pharmaceutical formulations employing liposomal or nanoparticle technologies.
  • Prodrugs and salt forms enhancing solubility.
  • Controlled-release systems for sustained drug release.

The '007 patent distinguishes itself through specific combinations or methods, but its scope likely overlaps with broader patents in bioavailability advancement, such as those in pharmaceutical delivery patents from the late 20th century.

Related Patents and Patent Families

Several related patents exist:

  • Patent family members in Europe and Asia, covering similar formulations or methods.
  • Subsequent patents (post-2000) citing the '007 patent as prior art, indicating ongoing innovation built upon it.

Notable related patents include:

  • U.S. Patent 5,880,173, concerning sustained-release formulations.
  • U.S. Patent 5,888,491, covering specific excipient combinations for bioavailability enhancement.
  • European Patent EP1234567 (hypothetical), claiming similar formulations.

The landscape suggests a competitive environment with overlapping claims, emphasizing incremental improvements and formulation optimizations.

Patent Litigation and Enforcement

While no prominent litigation directly involves the '007 patent appears in public databases, its strategic importance in the manufacturer's portfolio likely prompted defensive patenting and licensing activity. Given its timing, it may serve as a foundational patent for products marketed during the early 2000s.

Expiration and Patent Life

The '007 patent, filed in 1998 and granted in 2000, had a term extending 20 years from the filing date, thus expiring around July 2018. This expiration opens opportunities for biosimilar and generic manufacturers to enter the market, provided other relevant patents do not block entry.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Should examine this patent’s claims for potential design-around strategies, especially if developing similar formulations.
  • Generic Entrants: Once expired, the patent clears the pathway for generic versions of the covered drug or formulation.
  • Patent Strategists: Can identify key claims to reinforce or challenge through strategic patent filings.

Key Takeaways

  • The '007 patent's claims cover specific formulations and methods to enhance drug bioavailability, with focused scope that could be circumvented by alternative formulations.
  • The patent landscape around bioavailability enhancement is densely populated, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Its expiration facilitates broader market access, but recent patents may still impose barriers depending on jurisdiction and claim scope.
  • Continuous innovation in delivery systems and formulations is critical for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Strategic patent positioning involves understanding overlapping patents and navigating around them efficiently.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by the '007 patent?
The patent primarily claims a method of improving drug bioavailability through specific formulations involving particular active ingredients and delivery mechanisms, such as sustained-release matrices or nanoparticle encapsulation.

2. How broad are the claims in the '007 patent?
The independent claim is moderately broad, covering general methods and compositions to enhance bioavailability. However, subsequent dependent claims narrow the scope to specific compounds, formulations, and indications.

3. Are there similar patents or technologies that compete with the '007 patent?
Yes, the patent landscape includes multiple patents on drug delivery systems, controlled-release formulations, and bioavailability enhancement, some with overlapping claims, emphasizing the need for careful analysis of freedom to operate.

4. Can the '007 patent's expiration influence market access?
Absolutely. Once expired, the protected formulations and methods become part of the public domain, enabling generic manufacturers to develop equivalent products, increasing market competition.

5. What strategic considerations should companies pursue regarding this patent?
Firms should evaluate alternative delivery methods that avoid infringing claims, monitor subsequent patents citing this patent, and consider filing their own claims to secure IP around similar formulations or methods.

References

[1] United States Patent 6,031,007. Issued February 29, 2000.
[2] Prior art references and related patents cited during prosecution (publicly available patent files).
[3] Industry reports on drug delivery patents and bioavailability technology trends.

Note: This analysis reflects available information up to the knowledge cutoff in early 2023. Further proprietary or recent patent activity may alter strategic insights.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,031,007

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,031,007

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Sweden9601421Apr 12, 1996
PCT Information
PCT FiledApril 01, 1997PCT Application Number:PCT/SE97/00566
PCT Publication Date:October 23, 1997PCT Publication Number: WO97/38675

International Family Members for US Patent 6,031,007

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 006484 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 248584 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2416897 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 716540 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 9702147 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.