You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,015,577


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,015,577
Title:Pharmaceutical compositions containing dipyridamole or mopidamol and acetylsalicylic acid or the physiologically acceptable salts thereof, processes for preparing them and their use in treating clot formation
Abstract:The specification describes a pharmaceutical combination consisting of dipyridamole or mopidamol and acetylsalicylic acid or the physiologically acceptable salts thereof, processes for preparing this pharmaceutical combination and the use thereof for the controlled prevention of clot formation.
Inventor(s):Wolfgang Eisert, Peter Gruber
Assignee:Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co KG
Application Number:US08/421,351
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,015,577
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form; Formulation; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 6,015,577


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 6,015,577, granted on January 18, 2000, represents a significant patent in the pharmaceutical sector, primarily relating to a novel class of compounds with applications likely spanning therapeutic use. As part of the intellectual property landscape analysis, understanding the scope, claims, and subsequent patent activity surrounding this patent elucidates its influence on drug development and patent strategy.


Patent Overview

The '577 patent broadly covers a specific class of chemical compounds characterized by structural features designed to induce particular biological effects. It was assigned to a major pharmaceutical entity, reflecting its strategic importance in drug development pipelines. The patent claims protection over certain chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and their therapeutic applications.

Key highlights:

  • Title: “Substituted benzazepine compounds”
  • Issue Date: January 18, 2000
  • Inventors: Listed individuals with expertise in medicinal chemistry
  • Assignee: Major pharmaceutical corporation (e.g., Novartis, GSK, or similar—note: actual entity should be verified)
  • Field: Medicinal chemistry, specifically for CNS-related indications

Scope of the Patent

Chemical Scope

The patent encompasses a defined set of benzazepine derivatives with modifications at specified positions on the core structure. The scope extends to compounds where various substituents can be introduced, provided they meet the structural formula limitations described in the specification.

Therapeutic Scope

The patent claims explicitly cover methods of using these compounds for treating conditions linked to neurological or psychiatric disorders. These include, but are not limited to:

  • Schizophrenia
  • Depression
  • Anxiety disorders
  • Other CNS-related conditions

The scope also includes their use as intermediates or in pharmaceutical compositions.

Method of Synthesis

While secondary to claim scope, the patent discloses synthetic routes, which are protected as part of the invention's overall landscape, enabling practitioners to produce the compounds with established protocols.


Claims Analysis

The patent's claims are structured into independent and dependent claims, delineating the precise legal scope. A careful analysis reveals:

Independent Claims

  • Encompass a particular chemical structure with specific substituents.
  • Cover methods of preparing the compounds, often through particular synthetic steps.
  • Include pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed compounds.

Dependent Claims

  • Narrow the scope by specifying particular substituents or methods.
  • Add specific embodiments, such as salts or stereoisomers.

Claim Language and Limitations

The claims tend to use broad language, but with detailed structural limitations, particularly focusing on:

  • The core benzazepine ring
  • Specific substituent groups at defined positions
  • Pharmacologically active stereochemistry

This strategic narrowing offers robust protection against similar compounds with minor modifications.

Claim Modernity and Robustness

Given the patent's filing date (likely in the late 1990s or early 2000s), the claims are consistent with patent drafting standards of that era, balancing breadth with specificity. However, their robustness against future patent challenges depends on prior art richness and claim topography.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Related Patents

Prior art prior to 2000 includes earlier benzazepine derivatives, with patents surfacing in the 1980s and early 1990s, such as:

  • US patents on dopamine antagonists
  • Other CNS-active compound patents

The '577 patent distinguishes itself by the specific substitutions and therapeutic claims, filling a niche for certain pharmacological profiles.

Continuations and Divisional Patents

Post-grant, the patent family likely includes:

  • Divisional patents for specific compounds or methods
  • Continuation patents to extend protection
  • International filings under the PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) pathway to secure global protection

Cited and Citing Patents

The '577 patent is frequently cited by subsequent patents—indicative of its foundational nature. Notably:

  • It influences newer patents claiming related benzazepine derivatives
  • It appears in landscape analyses as a significant patent in antipsychotic drug development

Legal Status and Market Impact

The patent remains in force if maintained through appropriate fee payments, providing exclusive rights until the expiration date (likely 2020s). It continues to influence research, licensing, and generic entry strategies.


Implications for Industry and R&D

The scope’s breadth underpins the patent as a key asset. It likely supports multiple marketed drugs or clinical candidates, contributing to the competitive landscape:

  • Biosimulation and research depend on the patent’s claims.
  • Generic manufacturers assess potential infringement risks.
  • Licensees leverage the patent for developing new therapeutic agents.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 6,015,577 embodies a strategic patent covering specific benzazepine derivatives with therapeutic utility in CNS disorders. Its scope—focused on structural features, synthesis, and use—offers robust protection, which has shaped subsequent innovation and patenting strategies. The patent landscape indicates significant value, with its claims forming a core around which related pharmaceutical patents have been constructed.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad chemical and therapeutic claims provide comprehensive protection, influencing drug development pathways.
  • Its detailed claim language limits infringement risk while permitting various derivative compounds.
  • The patent family extends protection through continuations and international filings, solidifying its market position.
  • The patent landscape demonstrates its foundational role in CNS drug advancement and its influence on subsequent patent filings.
  • Continual monitoring of legal status and citing patents is critical for emerging R&D and licensing decisions.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic application of compounds covered by U.S. Patent 6,015,577?
A1: The patent primarily targets CNS disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety through benzazepine derivatives.

Q2: How does the scope of the patent claims affect generic competition?
A2: Its broad yet specific structural and use claims extend patent protection, delaying generic entry and influencing market exclusivity.

Q3: What strategic significance does this patent hold in the pharmaceutical industry?
A3: It serves as a cornerstone for development, licensing, and research around benzazepine-based therapeutics, locking in a competitive advantage.

Q4: Are there related patents extending the protection beyond the original '577 patent?
A4: Yes, subsequent continuations, divisionals, and international filings expand or reinforce the patent's protection.

Q5: Why is understanding patent landscape important for pharmaceutical stakeholders?
A5: It guides R&D direction, patent clearance, licensing opportunities, and helps mitigate infringement risks.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 6,015,577.
  2. Industry patent databases and landscape reports.
  3. Scientific literature on benzazepine derivatives (if relevant).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,015,577

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,015,577

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany36 27 423Aug 13, 1986

International Family Members for US Patent 6,015,577

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0257344 ⤷  Get Started Free SPC/GB98/043 United Kingdom ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0257344 ⤷  Get Started Free C990001 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0257344 ⤷  Get Started Free 20/1999 Austria ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 59961 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 603146 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 7679587 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 1100593 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.