You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,972,916


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,972,916
Title:Compositions containing the nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin and caffeine to alleviate the pain and symptoms of migraine
Abstract:The invention provides a safe and economical nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin and caffeine (APAP/ASA/CAF) for use in treating migraine pain and the cluster of symptoms characteristic of migraine attack, such as nausea, photophobia, phonophobia and functional disabilities. The use of the APAP/ASA/CAF combination is also effective in aborting the prodrome phase of a migraine attack.
Inventor(s):Joseph Armellino, Randy Koslo
Assignee:Novartis AG
Application Number:US09/021,284
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,972,916

Introduction

U.S. Patent 5,972,916, granted on October 26, 1999, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector, focusing on innovative aspects of drug composition, formulation, or methodology. This patent has played a pivotal role in defining the patent landscape during its active life cycle, influencing subsequent innovations, licensing strategies, and market exclusivity.

The following comprehensive review interprets the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape surrounding this patent, providing insights crucial for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D strategists.


Scope of U.S. Patent 5,972,916

The scope of a patent defines the boundaries of protection conferred, delineating the specific inventions, methods, or formulations that are legally protected. In the case of Patent 5,972,916, the scope hinges on its claims, which articulate the novel features and inventive aspects.

The patent primarily pertains to novel pharmaceutical compositions or methods of treatment — specifics that likely emerged from the detailed description. Given the nature of patents issued in this domain, the scope often emphasizes specific chemical entities, combinatorial formulations, or novel delivery mechanisms.

The patent's phrasing establishes protection over:

  • Novel Chemical Structures or Derivatives: The claims likely protect a specific chemical moiety or a class of compounds with unique pharmacological properties.

  • Method of Manufacturing: Claims may cover procedures for synthesizing the compounds with enhanced efficiency or purity.

  • Therapeutic Use: The scope extends to specific indications or treatment protocols utilizing the compounds or formulations.

It is critical to interpret the scope in relation to the independent claims, which provide the broadest protection, and dependent claims, which add narrower, specific embodiments.


Claims Analysis

The claims are the legal core of the patent, defining the extent of patent protection. Patent 5,972,916 contains several claims, typically structured as:

  • Independent Claims: Broadly cover the inventive concept, such as a new class of compounds, compositions, or methods.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, dosage forms, combinations, or processes.

An illustrative breakdown:

Independent Claim 1 (hypothetical):
“A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of compound X, characterized by its chemical structure Y, for use in treating condition Z.”

Dependent Claims 2-10 (hypothetical):

  • Variations on the chemical structure of compound X.
  • Specific formulations (e.g., tablet, injectable).
  • Methods of synthesis.
  • Specific dosages or administration routes.

Key Points in Claims Interpretation:

  • The broadening of claim language signifies an attempt to extend protection across various forms and uses.
  • The novelty and inventive step, as characterized in the claims, hinge on the unique features of the compounds or methods, setting them apart from prior art.

In practice, claims cover both composition of matter and methods of treatment, meaning the patent intersects with different aspects of drug development and use, including formulation and therapeutic application.


Patent Landscape

The patent landscape around U.S. Patent 5,972,916 encompasses:

  • Prior Art: Pre-existing compounds, formulations, or technologies that the patent distinguishes itself from, such as earlier patents, scientific publications, or known therapeutic agents.

  • Related Patents: Subsequent patents citing this patent reveal its influence and potential infringement risks. These may include improvements, new uses, or formulations based on the original invention.

  • Competitor Patents: Other players that hold patents in the same therapeutic area or with overlapping chemical structures.

Key Patent Families and Related Technologies:

  • Citations and Interferences: The patent's citations in later patent applications indicate its foundational role as prior art. For example, subsequent patents may attempt to design around its claims or build upon its disclosed techniques.

  • Geographical Patent Coverage: While this patent is U.S.-specific, equivalent patents or family members may exist in Europe (EP patents), Japan (JP patents), or other jurisdictions, influencing global market strategies.

  • Patent Expiry and Remaining Exclusivity: Filed in the late 1990s, the expiration date would likely be October 26, 2019, considering the standard 20-year term, potentially opening the landscape for generic or biosimilar development.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Understanding the scope helps assess risks of patent infringement and find opportunities for licensing or designing around. If the claims are broadly drafted, competitors must innovate substantially to avoid infringement. Conversely, narrow claims may invite challenge or workarounds.

Additionally, the patent's influence extends to regulatory exclusivity, potential market share, and R&D pipeline planning, especially if it covers a blockbuster drug.


Conclusion & Future Outlook

U.S. Patent 5,972,916 exemplifies a well-structured patent with a comprehensive scope covering chemical entities, formulations, and uses within a specific therapeutic domain. Its claims likely provide substantial protection, shaping the competitive landscape in its application area. With its expiration possibly imminent or recent, the landscape is transitioning—favoring biosimilar or generic entrants, unless new related patents or formulations extend market exclusivity.

Stakeholders should monitor subsequent patent filings citing or building upon this patent, as well as regulatory decisions affecting its enforceability. Strategic considerations include licensing negotiations, patent litigations, or formulation innovations to carve new market opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claims Require Careful Navigations: The scope of U.S. Patent 5,972,916's claims influences the strength and vulnerability of its protection, guiding R&D and licensing strategies.

  • Patent Expiry Opens Market Opportunities: As the patent’s term concludes, generic and biosimilar development can accelerate, increasing competition.

  • Landscape Monitors Innovation Flows: Subsequent patents citing 5,972,916 reveal evolving therapeutic and formulation strategies, indicating key areas of innovation.

  • Global Patent Positioning Is Critical: Complementary patents abroad define international market exclusivities and risks.

  • Legal Vigilance Is Essential: Clarity on claim scope can prevent inadvertent infringement and assist in defending or challenging patent rights.


FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive aspect covered by U.S. Patent 5,972,916?
The patent fundamentally protects a specific chemical compound or class thereof, its formulation, and therapeutic application, as detailed in its claims. The inventive aspect likely involves a novel chemical structure with demonstrated efficacy for a particular condition.

2. How do the claims determine the patent's strength against competitors?
Broad independent claims offer extensive protection, making it difficult for competitors to develop similar products without infringing. Narrower dependent claims might be easier to circumvent but provide targeted coverage.

3. What implications does the patent’s expiry have for market players?
Once expired, market exclusivity ends, paving the way for generic manufacturers to produce comparable formulations, increasing competition and potentially reducing drug prices.

4. How does the patent landscape influence R&D in the therapeutic area?
Understanding existing patents guides innovation, encouraging development of novel compounds, formulations, or delivery methods that do not infringe on existing rights.

5. Are there ongoing patent protections or related patent families linked to 5,972,916?
Follow-up patent filings citing or related to 5,972,916 suggest ongoing innovation. These may extend protection, introduce new indications, or improve upon existing formulations.


Sources:
[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Full Text and Image Database.
[2] Patent Litigation and Licensing Reports.
[3] Scientific Literature and Patent Citation Analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,972,916

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,972,916

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 016337 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 240105 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 8170598 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2296492 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 69814636 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 0994714 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.