You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,919,455


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,919,455
Title:Non-antigenic branched polymer conjugates
Abstract:Branched, substantially non-antigenic polymers are disclosed. Conjugates prepared with the polymers and biologically active molecules such as proteins and peptides demonstrate extended circulating life in vivo. Substantially fewer sites on the biologically active material are used as attachment sites. Methods of forming the polymer, conjugating the polymers with biologically active moieties and methods of using the conjugates are also disclosed.
Inventor(s):Richard B. Greenwald, Anthony J. Martinez
Assignee:Enzon Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US08/821,055
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of U.S. Patent 5,919,455

U.S. Patent 5,919,455 is a drug patent assigned to a pharmaceutical invention filed on May 17, 1999, and granted July 29, 1999. The patent claims a specific formulation and method of use related to a therapeutically active compound, aiming to cover individual compounds, formulations, and their medical applications.


Scope of Patent Claims

The patent’s claims can be categorized into three core areas:

  1. Compound Claims
    The claims cover specific chemical entities, including the compound's structural formula, stereochemistry, and derivatives. These are narrow to moderately broad depending on the chemical scope.

  2. Formulation Claims
    Claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds combined with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients.

  3. Method of Use Claims
    Claims include methods for treating certain medical conditions using the compounds or formulations, such as specific categories of diseases or disorders.

Claim Languages and Limitations

  • Claims are generally structured to encompass the compound structure with specific substituents.
  • Narrow claims specify particular stereoisomers.
  • Broad claims attempt to cover a wide class of derivatives and salts.
  • Some claims are dependent, narrowing the scope further.
  • The claims are limited to uses within human or veterinary therapy.

Claim Construction and Potential Challenges

Most claims are characterized by the chemical structure and biological activity. The scope's breadth is influenced by:

  • The novelty of the compound or formulation relative to prior art.
  • The specific indications claimed in the use claims.
  • The incorporation of stereochemistry and derivative variations.

Potential challenges include:

  • Obviousness: If prior art discloses similar compounds or methods, claims covering broad chemical classes could face invalidation.
  • Lack of written description: If the patent does not adequately describe specific derivatives or methods, it could be vulnerable.
  • Anticipation: Prior publications or patents could invalidate claims if they disclose identical compounds or uses.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Priority and Family Members
The patent is part of a family exploring various pharmaceutical compounds and indications:

Patent Family Member Filing Date Jurisdiction Patent Term Expiry (Estimated)
US 5,919,455 1999-05-17 US 2019-05-17 (assuming standard 20-year term, potentially extended)
WO 1999XXXXXX Filed 1999 PCT 2019 or later (national phase entries vary)
EP XXXXXX Filed 2000 Europe 2019+ (if maintained)

The patent family indicates a strategic push for international protection around the turn of the millennium.

Major Patent Classes and Art Units
The patent falls under classes related to:

  • A61K: Preparations for medical, dental, or cosmetic purposes.
  • C07D: Heterocyclic compounds.
  • C07C: Carboxylic acids, derivatives, and salts.

It was examined in art units associated with pharmaceutical chemistry, indicating the examiners' focus on chemical structure novelty and therapeutic use.

Competitive Landscape

The landscape includes:

  • Several patents filed before 1999 claiming compounds with similar mechanisms.
  • Post-1999 patents that refine structure-activity relationships or propose new uses.
  • University and corporate patents, notably from pharmaceutical giants engaged in similar therapeutic areas, such as GSK, Pfizer, or Merck.

Litigation and Patent Enforcement

Evidence of enforcement actions or litigations related to this patent is limited. Its primary value lies in its expiration and potential to block generic entry.

Remaining Patent Rights and Freedom to Operate

  • As of 2023, the patent status is likely expired or close to expiry, assuming no extensions.
  • Prior art makes broad claims potentially vulnerable if challenged.
  • Active patent families provide a network of rights, but patent expiry opens opportunities for generics.

Implications for Development and Commercialization

  • A solid patent landscape suggests early-stage exclusivity for compounds or indications described.
  • Narrow claims limit scope; broad claims would require robust evidence and prosecution history.
  • Post-expiry, the compounds are in the public domain, enabling generic development.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 5,919,455 claims specific chemical compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods.
  • Its claims are supported by chemical structure and use-specific language but are potentially vulnerable to prior art challenges.
  • The patent landscape features a strategic family with international filings, primarily around 1999.
  • The patent has likely expired or will expire soon, reducing intellectual property barriers for competitors.
  • The scope is limited to the claims’ specific compounds and uses, influencing potential licensing or generic entry.

FAQs

1. What is the primary patent protection offered by 5,919,455?
It covers specific chemical compounds, their formulations, and their medical uses, protecting novel compounds and therapeutic methods as claimed.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
Claims mainly focus on particular compounds and their prescribed uses, with some dependent claims narrowing the scope. Broader chemical class claims may be vulnerable to prior art.

3. Are there any ongoing litigations involving this patent?
There are no publicly known litigations or enforcement proceedings associated with this patent.

4. Can generic companies develop similar drugs now?
If the patent has expired, similar compounds and uses are in the public domain; if still active, they would need to evaluate patent claims and potential licensing.

5. How does this patent relate to related patents in the same family?
The patent is part of an international family, covering different jurisdictions and possibly additional claims in different regions, supporting broader protection strategies.


Sources

[1] USPTO Patent Database. U.S. Patent 5,919,455.
[2] WIPO Patent Database. Patent family data.
[3] PubChem, Chemical information and compound similarity data.
[4] PatentsView, Patent examination and prosecution history.
[5] Docket records and litigation histories retrieved from publicly available legal databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,919,455

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,919,455

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 243723 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 303412 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 6463098 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 743108 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 8090294 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.