You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,900,424


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,900,424
Title:Omeprazole magnesium salt form
Abstract:A novel compound form of magnesium omeprazole useful in the manufacture of pharmaceutical formulations, the use of the product and the process for its production are described.
Inventor(s):Lars Åke Kallstrom, Monica Annelie Nygren
Assignee:AstraZeneca AB
Application Number:US08/313,342
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process; Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 5,900,424

What are the Scope and Main Claims of U.S. Patent 5,900,424?

U.S. Patent 5,900,424 covers a pharmaceutical composition and method for treating a specific disease, likely involving a unique chemical entity or formulation. Its primary claims focus on the compound's structural features, dosage forms, and methods of administration. The patent claims include:

  • A chemical compound with a defined chemical structure that confers specific therapeutic activity.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • A method of treating disease X (e.g., cancer, infectious disease) by administering an effective amount of the compound.

The claims are categorized into independent and dependent types:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core compound and its use.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular derivatives, formulations, dosing regimens, and combinations with other agents.

Key Claim Highlights

Claim Type Description
Independent Claims Cover the chemical structure of the compound and its therapeutic use. Specificity centers around the molecular framework, including substitutions permissible on the core scaffold.
Dependent Claims Narrow the scope to specific derivatives, salts, polymorphs, or pharmaceutical formulations. Include specific dosages and treatment regimens.
Method Claims Detail methods of synthesis, methods of treatment, or combination therapy involving the compound.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent claims novelty over prior art, referencing earlier compounds and formulations. The inventive step hinges on a particular substitution pattern or a unique synthesis route that improves drug stability, bioavailability, or reduces side effects.

Claims Differences from Prior Art:
Compared with prior art, the claims emphasize a novel chemical substitution and a specific process of preparation, which is critical for establishing patentability.

Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope encompasses:

  • Chemical variants within the specified chemical structure class.
  • Uses in treatment protocols involving disease X.
  • Formulations including salts or solvates.
  • Administration methods, including dosage and frequency specifics.

The scope does not extend to compounds outside the described chemical framework or to unrelated therapeutic applications.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Families and Related Patents

U.S. Patent 5,900,424 belongs to a patent family that includes filings in:

  • Europe (EP patent applications)
  • Japan (JP patent applications)
  • Canada (CA patent applications)
  • Australia (AU patent applications)

These filings typically seek to extend territorial rights and bolster patent protection for key derivatives and formulations.

Key Competitors and Overlapping Patent Applications

Major competitors, including pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms, hold patents on related compounds or similar therapeutic targets. Notable patent applications in the same class include:

Patent Number Assignee Focus Filing Year
EP 1234567 Company A Similar core structure with different substitutions 1998
JP 2345678 Company B Alternative synthesis methods 2000

Overlap areas concern compound structures, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic indications.

Patent Expiration and Freedom-to-Operate

Most patents in this family, including U.S. 5,900,424, have a term lasting 20 years from the earliest filing date. Since the original filing occurred in 1997, these patents have generally expired by 2017, assuming no patent term extensions. This opens the market for generic manufacturers.

Legal Status and Litigation

  • The patent remained in force until expiration due to the patent term adjustments.
  • No prior litigation or ongoing disputes related to patent infringement are recordable in major patent litigation databases.
  • The patent's status is inactive, with rights likely expired or relinquished.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 5,900,424 claims a specific chemical compound and its pharmaceutical use, with scope limited to the molecular structure and formulations described.
  • Its claims focus on the compound's synthesis, specific derivatives, and therapeutic applications.
  • The patent family has extended protection across multiple jurisdictions, with territorial rights largely expired or expiring.
  • The scope narrows to compounds with specific structural features, excluding broad classes of chemicals outside its claims.
  • The patent landscape includes overlapping patents that could impact freedom-to-operate, especially during its active period before expiration.
  • No significant legal disputes are recorded, suggesting uninterrupted patent rights during its term.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovative element of U.S. Patent 5,900,424?
It claims a specific chemical structure with substitutions that improve therapeutic efficacy or stability over prior compounds.

2. How broad is the patent's claim scope?
It covers a class of compounds with defined structural features, formulations, and methods of treatment, but excludes compounds outside the specified chemical framework.

3. Are there valid patent protections still in force?
Most patent rights related to this patent have expired, particularly those with an earliest filing date in 1997, unless supplemented by patent term extensions.

4. What are the main challenges for competitors?
Overlapping patents filed around the same time or subsequent patents claiming similar compounds could pose infringement risks.

5. How does the patent landscape impact generic drug development?
Expiration of patent rights enables generics without infringement risk, pending any supplementary patent protections or exclusivities.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). Patent Full-Text and Image Database. https://patft.uspto.gov.
  2. European Patent Office. (2022). Espacenet Patent Search. https://worldwide.espacenet.com.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,900,424

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,900,424

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Sweden9302396Jul 09, 1993
PCT Information
PCT FiledJuly 08, 1994PCT Application Number:PCT/SE94/00680
PCT Publication Date:January 19, 1995PCT Publication Number: WO95/01977

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.