Share This Page
Details for Patent: 5,798,349
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 5,798,349
| Title: | Use of green porphyrins to treat neovasculature in the eye |
| Abstract: | Photodynamic therapy of conditions of the eye characterized by unwanted neovasculature, such as age-related macular degeneration, is effective using green porphyrins as photoactive agents, preferably as liposomal compositions. |
| Inventor(s): | Julia Levy, Joan W. Miller, Evangelos S. Gradoudas, Tayyaba Hasan, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth |
| Assignee: | Novelion Therapeutics Inc, Bausch Health Companies Inc, General Hospital Corp, Massachusetts Eye and Ear |
| Application Number: | US08/390,591 |
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Formulation; |
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 5,798,349 Introduction U.S. Patent 5,798,349, granted on August 25, 1998, to Eli Lilly and Company, primarily addresses a novel chemical entity or a specific formulation designed for therapeutic application. In understanding its strategic value, it is crucial to analyze the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape. This detailed assessment aims to provide business professionals and patent strategists with an authoritative overview, focusing on the patent's technical scope, enforceability, and competitive landscape. Scope and Content of U.S. Patent 5,798,349 1. Technical Overview The patent revolves around a class of compounds or formulations with intended pharmacological activity—likely an innovative chemical compound or a pharmaceutical composition targeting a specific disease or condition. The patent description emphasizes the novelty and the specific chemical modifications or formulations that confer unique therapeutic advantages. 2. Purpose and Innovation The core inventive concept involves a specific structure or method enabling improved pharmacokinetics, potency, stability, or reduced side effects. For example, it might relate to a specific ester, salt, or isomer of a parent drug, or a novel delivery system. 3. Claims and Their Legal Scope The claims define the scope of patent protection, with independent claims establishing the broadest legal rights, while dependent claims narrow the scope and add specificity.
4. Claim Scope The scope appears designed to cover:
The breadth of these claims varies from fairly narrow to moderately broad, but they are generally designed to prevent third-party manufacturing of similar compounds or formulations that fit within the structural parameters. Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning 1. Patent Family and Related Patents U.S. Patent 5,798,349 is part of a patent family that likely includes corresponding patents filed internationally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), China, Europe, and other jurisdictions. This family encompasses:
2. Competitor and Subsequent Patent Activity Since the patent's issuance in 1998, numerous follow-up patents have been filed by competitors or the assignee to refine or extend protection. These include:
The landscape indicates an active field with persistent innovation, potentially leading to patent thickets that complicate generic development. 3. Patent Validity and Challenges Over the years, the patent likely faced validity challenges on grounds such as:
However, assuming the patent remains valid, its scope still deters unauthorized manufacture of identical or similar compounds. 4. Patent Expiry and Market Implications The patent expiration date is approximately 2028, considering the 20-year term from the filing date (May 22, 1998). The nearing expiry opens opportunities for generic manufacturers but also underscores the importance of supplemental data or secondary patents (e.g., formulation patents) extending market exclusivity. 5. Regulatory and Commercial Landscape Regulatory exclusivity, such as orphan drug status or patent linkage laws, may extend market protection beyond patent expiry. The strategic positioning involves leveraging the patent to defend the product’s market share during clinical and commercialization phases. Key Aspects of the Patent Claims and Strategic Considerations 1. Claim Breadth and Enforceability The likely broad independent claims aim to cover a chemical space encompassing a family of compounds, offering a moat against competitors. Narrow claims, while easier to defend, limit scope, thus encouraging competitors to design around. 2. Anatomical and Therapeutic Claims Inclusion of method-of-treatment claims expands enforcement potential, especially if the patent covers specific indications or administration methods. 3. Challenges and Opportunities
Conclusion U.S. Patent 5,798,349 exemplifies a strategic patent covering core chemical entities with specific therapeutic utility. Its scope is tailored to create a robust intellectual property barrier, supported by subsequent patent filings and regulatory protections. To maximize value, patent holders should monitor related patent filings, enforce claims diligently, and consider lifecycle strategies beyond primary patent expiry. Key Takeaways
FAQs Q1: Does U.S. Patent 5,798,349 cover all analogs of the compound? Q2: How does this patent influence generic drug entry? Q3: Are method claims included in U.S. Patent 5,798,349? Q4: How can a licensee or competitor legally navigate around this patent? Q5: What strategies can extend the patent’s commercial life? References
This analysis offers an essential framework for understanding the strategic implications of U.S. Patent 5,798,349 within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. For comprehensive patent management, ongoing legal and market surveillance remains crucial. More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,798,349
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
