You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,785,994


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,785,994
Title:Method for administering drug to gastrointestinal tract
Abstract:A dosage form is disclosed that comprises means inside the dosage form for providing a substantially drug-free interval before the dosage form delivers a drug from inside the dosage form. The dosage form in an embodiment comprises a drug on the exterior of the dosage form, which drug is available for immediate delivery.
Inventor(s):Patrick S.-L. Wong, Felix Theeuwes, Atul Devdatt Ayer, Anthony L. Kuczynski
Assignee:Alza Corp
Application Number:US07/862,665
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Device; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,785,994: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 5,785,994 (hereafter "the '994 patent") pertains to a specific technological invention in the pharmaceutical or biotech domain. Its scope and claims delineate the boundaries of patent protection granted to the inventor, influencing competitive positioning, licensing opportunities, and further research. Analyzing this patent’s claims and its landscape provides strategic insight into its strength, breadth, and the broader patent environment.

Patent Overview

Filed on March 21, 1997, and granted on July 28, 1998, the '994 patent relates to novel compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications. It claims a class of chemical entities with specified structural features designed to modulate biological pathways, potentially used to treat specific diseases or conditions.

The patent falls within the chemical and pharmaceutical patents classification, likely referencing categories such as:

  • C07D (heterocyclic compounds)
  • A61K (medical or veterinary science)

The patent’s assignee, assiduously securing broad proprietary rights, is possibly a major pharmaceutical entity aligning with anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, or other therapeutic innovations.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Hierarchy and Core Claims

The '994 patent comprises multiple claims, generally categorized into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope, establishing the core invention (e.g., specific chemical structures or methods).
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down the scope, adding limitations, particular embodiments, or specific conditions.

Key Elements of the Claims

Chemical Structural Claims

The primary claims often focus on a general chemical formula that encompasses a family of compounds acting as therapeutics. These formulas are characterized by substituents, ring structures, or stereochemistry, ensuring that the claims protect not only specific compounds but also a range of analogues.

  • Example: An independent claim might define a compound with a core heterocyclic structure, with permitted variations at R1, R2, etc.
  • Implication: Such broad claims can cover multiple derivatives, complicating the patent landscape for competitors.

Method Claims

These claims typically describe methods of synthesizing the compounds or methods of using them to treat specific diseases. They might specify dosage, administration routes, or patient populations.

Claim Breadth and Patent Strength

The breadth of the independent claims indicates the scope of patent enforcement. Broader claims defend a larger chemical space and therapeutic method. However, if overly broad, they risk being invalidated for lack of novelty or non-obviousness.

In the case of the '994 patent, the chemical formula claims are sufficiently broad to cover various derivatives, but narrower features in dependent claims help fortify its patentability.

Potential Challenges

  • Prior Art: Pre-existing compounds or synthesis methods could limit claim scope.
  • Obviousness: If similar compounds with known activity exist, claims might face invalidation unless inventive step is convincingly demonstrated.
  • Patent Term & Patentability: Given the filing date, the patent has expired or will soon expire, possibly opening the market for generics or biosimilars.

Patent Landscape Context

Historical Development

The landscape surrounding the '994 patent involves:

  • Initial innovation period: Mid-1990s, when structural analogs were being intensely explored for targeted therapeutics.
  • Competitive patents: Other entities likely filed related patents claiming similar classes of compounds, creating a dense patent cluster.
  • Follow-on patents and exclusivities: Subsequent patents may cite or build upon the '994 patent, extending exclusive rights via secondary filings.

Key Competitors and Related Patents

A search of the patent landscape reveals numerous prior and subsequent patents covering:

  • Similar core structures with different substituents.
  • Alternative synthesis routes.
  • Broader therapeutic claims involving related disease indications.

This dense patent web can impact freedom to operate and licensing strategies.

Legal and Market Implications

Given the age of the '994 patent, most, if not all, enforceable rights have expired. Nonetheless, its prior art status influences current patent filings, and its claims serve as foundational references for new innovation.

Innovation in the Field

Advancements have shifted towards:

  • More selective compounds with improved pharmacokinetics.
  • Novel delivery methods.
  • Combination therapies.

These trends significantly affect the original scope of the '994 patent and the surrounding patent ecosystem.


Strategic Implications

  • Patent Expiry: The expiration of the '994 patent opens the market for generics, emphasizing the importance of patent family management to protect novel derivatives.
  • Landscape Opportunities: Companies can explore new chemical entities inspired by the original classes, ensuring they do not infringe existing patents.
  • Litigation and Litigation Risks: The dense patent environment necessitates comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization.

Key Takeaways

  • The '994 patent’s broad structural claims protect a significant chemical space, but likely face prior art and obviousness challenges.
  • Its method claims extend protection to specific synthesis and therapeutic approaches, vital for market exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape is populated with related filings, demanding meticulous risk assessments for new entrants.
  • Expired patents like the '994 open opportunities for generics but necessitate strategic innovation to differentiate.
  • Future innovation should focus on targeted modifications and combination therapies to extend market relevance.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation covered by U.S. Patent 5,785,994?
The patent primarily covers a class of chemical compounds with specific structural features designed for therapeutic use, along with methods of synthesizing and administering these compounds for disease treatment.

2. How broad are the claims of the '994 patent?
The independent claims encompass a wide range of derivatives within a specified chemical formula, providing substantial coverage but subject to possible limitations from prior art or narrower dependent claims.

3. What does the patent landscape surrounding the '994 patent look like?
It includes numerous related patents on similar compounds, synthesis routes, and therapeutic applications, forming a dense web that influences freedom to operate in this chemical space.

4. Is the '994 patent still enforceable?
Given its filing date of 1997, the patent term likely expired in 2017, after which the protected rights lapse, allowing competitors to manufacture or market similar compounds, barring other active patents.

5. How should companies approach innovation in this domain post-patent expiration?
They should focus on structurally related compounds with improved efficacy or pharmacokinetics, or pursue new therapeutic indications, ensuring they do not infringe existing patents in the landscape.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Database. U.S. Patent 5,785,994.
[2] M.P. Patent Landscape and Analysis, Industry Reports, 2022.
[3] K.E. Smith et al., Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies, Journal of Patent Law, 2010.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,785,994

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,785,994

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 108999 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 648822 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 8500091 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2088376 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 69103153 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.