Share This Page
Details for Patent: 5,752,363
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 5,752,363
| Title: | Method and apparatus for manufacturing liquid dispensers | ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | A method is provided for manufacturing liquid dispensers of the general type having a body 10 presenting a pocket 16, a glass ampule 12 received in the body and enclosing a liquid to be dispensed, and a porous element 14 covering the pocket of the body. The method includes arranging a plurality of bodies 10 in a row, bottom ends up, on a tray, and placing ampules 12 in the pockets 16. A strip 72 of porous material is aligned over the pockets of the bodies and secured in place. Thereafter, the strip is cross cut into individual elements to complete the manufacture of the liquid dispensers. The securing step is preferably carried out by ultrasonically welding the porous material to the bodies so that it is not necessary to use adhesives. The cross-cutting step is preferably carried out by pressing a heated wire through the strip of porous material at a position intermediate each pair of adjacent bodies. An apparatus for carrying out manufacture of the dispensers is also provided. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | William R. Edwards, Paul K. Frederick | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | FIRST SOURCE FINANCIAL Inc , CareFusion 2200 Inc | ||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US08/837,652 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Device; | ||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | United States Patent 5,752,363: Scope, Claims, and US Patent Landscape for Ultrasonically Welded Unfoamed-Laminate Porous Covers on Breakable Glass AmpulesUnited States Patent 5,752,363 claims methods and apparatus for manufacturing a liquid dispenser that combines a breakable glass ampule, a body pocket, and a porous element that includes an unfoamed laminate. Core process steps center on placing ampules, covering pockets with porous material, securing via ultrasonic welding of the unfoamed laminate to the body, and singulating porous elements using heated wires (cross-cuts) in production. This patent’s enforceable scope is concentrated in two technical pillars:
1) Material/process: “unfoamed laminate” porous element and ultrasonically welding it to the body while preserving ampule integrity. What is claimed in US 5,752,363 (claim-by-claim scope)?Claim 1: Base method using ultrasonic welding of an unfoamed laminateClaim 1 defines a manufacturing method for a dispenser with:
Method steps (essential):
Enforceability center: the securing step must be ultrasonic welding and must weld the unfoamed laminate portion to the body. The claim is method-limited, tied to the manufacturing sequence. Claim 2: Row/strip manufacture with ultrasonic welding then singulationClaim 2 depends on claim 1 and adds batch processing:
Enforceability center: the “strip” format plus the “thereafter cutting” step. Cutting occurs after ultrasonic securing. Claim 3: Production line timing by intermittently advancing traysClaim 3 depends on claim 2:
Enforceability center: line choreography that enables securing and cutting at separated stations. Claim 4: Ultrasonic welding with pressing horn/contactClaim 4 depends on claim 1:
Enforceability center: defines the ultrasonic welding implementation as a pressing contact process (horn to porous element/body). Claim 5: Heated wire cutting through strip at intermediate positionsClaim 5 depends on claim 2:
Enforceability center: the cutting mechanism is a heated wire pressed laterally through the porous strip, with cross cuts between adjacent bodies. Claim 6: Alternative manufacturing flow using heated wire and websClaim 6 is a separate independent method (not a direct continuation from claim 1 but contains parallel technical structure) for manufacturing a dispenser with:
Notable difference vs claim 2: claim 6’s sequence is framed as “secure” and “cut” without explicitly restating ultrasonic welding to the body in the method portion shown, though the overall patent context and the later dependent claims and apparatus language indicate ultrasonic securing is the intended securing method. The enforceable reading of claim 6 still requires the dispenser outcome and porous-unfoamed-laminate feature, but the snippet provided does not explicitly state “ultrasonically welding” in claim 6’s method steps as written by the user. Enforceability center: combines strip covering with heated-wire singulation; ultrasonic welding may be implied by the patent’s technology focus, but claim scope depends on the exact statutory text. Claim 7: Same line timing concept applied to claim 6Claim 7 depends on claim 6:
Claim 8: Conveyor/web feeding, split webs, longitudinal stripsClaim 8 is another independent method emphasizing higher-throughput handling:
Enforceability center: prior segmentation at the web stage using a heated wire, then alignment, securing, and final cutting into individual porous elements. This claim expands scope beyond cross-cutting a strip after placement. Claim 9: Web made of open-celled foamClaim 9 depends on claim 8:
Enforceability center: constrains web composition/type. What is the apparatus claim scope (claims 10–13)?Claim 10: Apparatus for manufacturing with ultrasonic welder and cross-cutterClaim 10 is an apparatus claim for manufacturing the liquid dispenser with unfoamed laminate porous element and breakable glass ampules, comprising:
Enforceability center: physical elements in a system. The ultrasonic welder and cross-cutting means are required. Claim 11: Horn-based ultrasonic welding with ultrasound transmitting meansClaim 11 depends on claim 10:
Enforceability center: horn pressing and anti-ampoule-break concept is tied to operation but still functions as a claim-limiting description of the welding method. Claim 12: Heated-wire cross-cutting using multiple longitudinally spaced wiresClaim 12 depends on claim 10:
Enforceability center: multiple heated wires in spaced arrangement that press laterally through porous strip to form intermediate cross cuts. Claim 13: Indexing advancing tray between operationsClaim 13 depends on claim 10:
Enforceability center: machine indexing sequence. What is the functional “core” the claims protect?Across the set, the protection coheres around this manufacturing system: 1) Dispenser architecture (product form tied to method)
This product architecture narrows the universe of “porous covered ampule dispensers” to those with an unfoamed laminate porous element and breakable ampule release through it. 2) Securing porous element using ultrasonic welding to the body
The claims capture the manufacturing choice: ultrasonic attachment rather than adhesives, heat seals, or mechanical crimping, at least for the unfoamed laminate to the body. 3) Singulation via heated wire cross-cutting
4) Production line handling: tray rows, indexing, intermittent advancement, and multi-station sequencing
This yields a narrow but practical claim strategy: protect both process steps and the machinery enabling them. Where does the claim scope likely be weakest (design-around pressure points)?Design-around opportunities follow directly from claim limiting words: A) Remove “unfoamed laminate”If porous elements use a foamed laminate, a non-laminated porous sheet, a different layer structure, or a porous composite that is not an “unfoamed laminate,” then claims keyed to that specific material feature weaken. Claim 1 and claim 2 explicitly require “unfoamed laminate.” B) Avoid ultrasonic welding of the porous laminate to the bodyClaims are explicit that the securing is by ultrasonic welding (claims 1 and 2). Substituting:
C) Replace heated-wire cuttingClaims 5 and 6 and claim 8 depend on heated wire pressing. Using laser cutting, water-jet cutting, mechanical punching, or cold-knife cutting might avoid those limitations. D) Replace the specific segmentation geometryThe claims specify positions “intermediate each pair of adjacent bodies” and web splitting into longitudinal strips with a heated wire. Cutting at different relative locations or segmenting by other methods may avoid literal alignment. US patent landscape (what this patent most likely overlaps and how to map it for FTO/investment decisions)The dataset provided includes only the claims of US 5,752,363. A full landscape normally requires pulling:
1) Likely infringement adjacency: porous-covered ampule dispensersUS 5,752,363 sits at the intersection of:
Any competitor making a dispenser with:
2) Manufacturing-process adjacency: ultrasonic welding of porous laminatesEven if product form differs, the strongest overlap in the landscape typically comes from suppliers using ultrasonic welding for polymeric laminates to housings. Your risk rises when:
3) Production engineering adjacency: web/strip handling and heated-wire singulationThe claims also map to industrial packaging-like converting lines:
Companies with converting platforms that produce “strip-covered pocket units” are likely to be cross-licensing or to carry competing IP. This patent’s specificity is on the combination of heated-wire cutting and ultrasonic securement plus unfoamed laminate. 4) Portfolio behavior expectations for this domainPatents in this area often come in clustered families covering:
US 5,752,363 already claims both methods and apparatus, which often means successors focus on:
What is the practical claim coverage for a manufacturing plant?Coverage map: method steps to line station hardwareThe patent can be translated into an assembly-line checklist:
If a line uses the same feature set, risk concentrates on:
Key Takeaways
FAQs1) Does US 5,752,363 claim the dispenser product itself or only manufacturing?The provided claims are method and apparatus claims focused on manufacturing and equipment for assembling a dispenser with the specified pocket, breakable glass ampule, and porous unfoamed-laminate element. 2) What single limitation most strongly differentiates claim 1 from generic assembly methods?The requirement that the porous element includes an unfoamed laminate and that the porous element is secured by ultrasonically welding the unfoamed laminate of the porous element to the body. 3) Can a process that uses ultrasonic welding but different cutting technology avoid claim 5?Claim 5 specifically recites a laterally extending heated wire pressed through the strip for cross cuts. Cutting that does not use that heated-wire mechanism would not meet that limitation. 4) Is there protection for production-line sequencing across multiple stations?Yes. Claims 3 and 7 cover separate longitudinally spaced trays and intermittently advancing trays. Claim 13 covers indexing means advancing the tray between securing and cross-cutting. 5) Which claims broaden scope by moving from strip-based handling to web-based segmentation?Claims 8 and 9 broaden the manufacturing concept by using a web and a heated wire to split the web into longitudinal strips, then aligning and securing those strips before final cutting. References[1] United States Patent 5,752,363, “Method and apparatus for manufacturing liquid dispensers.” Claims 1–13 (as provided in user prompt). More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,752,363
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
