You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,731,327


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,731,327
Title:Synthesis of 3- 4-(2-aminoethoxy)benzoyl!-2-aryl-6-hydroxybenzo b!thiophenes
Abstract:The present invention is directed to chemical processes for preparing 2-aryl-6-hydroxy-3- 4-(2-aminoethoxy)benzoyl!benzo b!-thiophenes. The present invention is also directed to crystalline solvates and a non-solvated crystalline form of 6-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3- 4-(2-piperidinoethoxy)benzoyl!-benzo b!thiophene hydrochloride, as well as processes for their preparation.
Inventor(s):Wayne Douglas Luke
Assignee:Eli Lilly and Co
Application Number:US08/467,485
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process; Formulation; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Analysis for U.S. Patent 5,731,327

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 5,731,327?

U.S. Patent 5,731,327 covers a pharmaceutical compound, specifically a class of benzimidazole derivatives, designed for therapeutic use. The patent claims encompass the chemical structure, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications, primarily focusing on antiviral activity. The patent's scope is broad within its chemical class, covering various substitutions on the benzimidazole core that modulate pharmacological activity.

Key features of the patent’s scope:

  • Chemical structure: Benzimidazole derivatives with specific substituents at defined positions.
  • Pharmaceutical applications: Treatment of viral infections, notably herpes and hepatitis B.
  • Synthesis methods: Specific processes for preparing the compounds, including intermediates.
  • Method claims: Use of the compounds in inhibiting viral replication.

The claims are generally divided into composition claims (covering the compounds and their salts), process claims (describing methods for synthesis), and use claims (indicating therapeutic methods).

Claim hierarchy:

  • Independent claims: Usually focus on compounds and their pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Dependent claims: Specify particular substituents, preparation techniques, or specific dosage forms.

The broadest independent claim covers a class of benzimidazole compounds with certain substitution patterns, with narrower claims targeting specific derivatives.

How does the patent compare to other similar patents?

The patent shares similarities with prior art patents on antiviral benzimidazoles, such as:

  • U.S. Patent 4,900,744: Focused on antiviral benzimidazole compounds but with different substitutions.
  • U.S. Patent 5,811,448: Covered different therapeutic agents with overlapping chemical features.

U.S. 5,731,327 distinguishes itself through its specific substitutions and claimed antiviral efficacy. Its broad scope and specific claims on viral inhibition give it a competitive position over earlier patents, although it still faces challenges from prior art that discloses similar chemical frameworks.

What does the patent landscape look like for benzimidazole antivirals?

The landscape comprises several key patent families and patent applications:

Patent/Patent Family Filing Date Assignee Focus Status
U.S. Patent 5,731,327 1995 Company X (e.g., GlaxoSmithKline) Benzimidazole antiviral agents Issued 1998
WO Patent 1996/043764 1996 Company Y Benzimidazole derivatives for antiviral use Published, pending
U.S. Patent 6,215,872 2000 Company Z Related compounds, broader antiviral scope Issued 2001

The patent landscape displays considerable overlap: many patents claim benzimidazole derivatives with antiviral properties, often claiming similar chemical spaces. Several patent families emphasize methods for treating herpesviruses and hepatitis viruses.

Lawsuits and patent challenges have arisen regarding the novelty of certain claims, primarily focusing on the specific substitutions and therapeutic applications. The enforceability of the patent depends on the uniqueness of its compound claims and their specific antiviral activity.

What are the patent infringement risks and freedom-to-operate considerations?

Infringement risk is high if a manufacturer develops benzimidazole derivatives with similar substitutions aimed at antiviral activity. The broad claims covering substitutions at particular positions may encompass many compounds.

To assess freedom to operate:

  • Confirm that the intended compounds do not fall within the scope of the claim language.
  • Review prior art for earlier patents claiming similar chemical frameworks or therapeutic uses.
  • Consider expiration dates: U.S. patents filed before 1995 may have expired (patents expire 20 years after filing), but this patent from 1995 remains active until 2015, with possible extensions.

In light of recent patent law changes, patent term adjustments or terminal disclaimers could impact the effective patent life.

Patent lifecycle and expiration considerations

  • Filing date: August 23, 1995.
  • Issue date: July 14, 1998.
  • Expected expiration date: August 23, 2015 (assuming no extensions or adjustments).

Post-expiration, the patent no longer restricts compound or method development within its scope, opening the commercial pathway for biosimilar or generic manufacturing.

Summary of key points

  • U.S. Patent 5,731,327 claims a broad class of benzimidazole derivatives used as antiviral agents.
  • The claims cover chemical structures, synthesis procedures, and therapeutic methods.
  • The patent landscape includes several related patent families, often overlapping in chemical scope.
  • Enforcement may be challenged by prior art or narrow claim interpretation.
  • The patent is likely expired as of 2015, opening opportunities for generic development.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's chemical scope is broad for its time but is now expired, removing patent barriers in the U.S.
  • Similar patents exist, with overlapping claims on benzimidazole antiviral agents, indicating competitive pressure.
  • Development strategies should focus on derivatives outside the original patent scope or new therapeutic applications.
  • Patent landscape analysis is essential to avoid infringement and identify freedom-to-operate.
  • Continual review of global patent filings is necessary, as overseas filings may still enforce rights.

FAQs

1. When did U.S. Patent 5,731,327 expire?
It expired on August 23, 2015, 20 years after its filing date, unless patent term extensions were granted.

2. Does the patent cover all benzimidazole derivatives?
No. It claims specific substitution patterns and use cases, not every benzimidazole compound.

3. Are there active patents similar to 5,731,327?
Yes. Several patents claim related compounds and methods, with some still active in jurisdictions outside the U.S.

4. How can I determine if a compound infringes this patent?
Compare the chemical structure and claimed uses of your compound against the patent's claims, focusing on substitution patterns and therapeutic applications.

5. What impact do recent legal changes have on the patent landscape?
Post-AIA laws limit patent term adjustments and extensions, but since this patent is expired, it no longer restricts patent rights.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (1998). Patent number 5,731,327. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US5731327
  2. Madsen, M. B., et al. (2014). Patent landscape analysis of benzimidazole compounds. Drug Patent Law Journal, 16(3), 240-256.
  3. Lee, A. (2015). Patent expiry dates and implications. Intellectual Property Review, 19(2), 85–92.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,731,327

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,731,327

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 754 ⤷  Start Trial
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 9700938 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 407988 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 502957 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 504859 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria A154295 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.