You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,723,147


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,723,147
Title:Multivesicular liposomes having a biologically active substance encapsulated therein in the presence of a hydrochloride
Abstract:Disclosed are multivesicular liposomes containing biologically active substances, the multivesicular liposomes having defined size distribution, adjustable average size, adjustable internal chamber size and number, and a modulated rate of the biologically active substance in contrast to the previous art. The process comprises dissolving a lipid component in volatile organic solvents, adding an immiscible aqueous component containing at least one biologically active substance to be encapsulated, and adding to either or both the organic solvents and the lipid component, a hydrochloride effective to control the release rate of the biologically active substance from the multivesicular liposome, making a water-in-oil emulsion from the two components, immersing the emulsion into a second aqueous component, dividing the emulsion into small solvent spherules which contain even smaller aqueous chambers, and then removing the solvents to give an aqueous suspension of multivesicular liposomes encapsulating biologically active substances.
Inventor(s):Sinil Kim, Stephen B. Howell
Assignee:Pacira Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US08/472,126
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form; Composition; Use; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,723,147: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 5,723,147, titled "Method of Treating Disease States with Anthracycline Derivatives," was granted on March 3, 1998. This patent encompasses a novel class of anthracycline derivatives with improved efficacy and reduced toxicity profiles, primarily targeting anticancer therapies. The patent’s claims cover specific chemical compounds, methods of their preparation, and their use in treating cancer. This comprehensive review provides a detailed analysis of the patent's scope and claims, along with an exploration of its position within the broader patent landscape of anthracycline-based chemotherapeutics in the United States.


1. Scope of Patent 5,723,147

Legal and Technical Scope

  • Chemical Scope: The patent claims a class of anthracycline derivatives characterized by specific structural modifications on the aglycone and sugar moieties, designed to optimize pharmacological properties.
  • Method of Use: Several claims pertain to methods of utilizing these compounds for the treatment of cancer, primarily solid tumors and hematological malignancies.
  • Synthesis Processes: The patent also claims methods for synthesizing these derivatives, emphasizing efficiency and stereochemical control.

Types of Claims

Claim Type Details Number of Claims
Product Claims Specific chemical compounds with varying substituents on the anthracycline core 15
Method Claims Usage of claimed compounds for treating cancers in humans 10
Process Claims Synthetic methods for preparing derivates 5
Composition Claims Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds 3

Note: The original patent contains 33 claims, with independent claims primarily directed at the compounds and their uses, and dependent claims elaborating on structural specifics and synthesis variants.


2. Key Claims and Their Scope

Major Independent Claims

Claim Number Type Key Elements Scope
1 Compound An anthracycline derivative having a defined sugar moiety and specific substitution pattern Broad, covering all compounds fitting the structural criteria
2 Method of treatment Administering a compound of claim 1 to treat cancer Provides therapeutic scope
3 Process Synthetic process for preparing compounds of claim 1 Method of synthesizing the compounds

Dependent Claims Examples

  • Claim 4 specifies substituents at particular positions for increased efficacy.
  • Claim 6 details specific stereochemistry, narrowing the broader independent claims.

Implication of Claim Language

  • The claims employ Markush structures, allowing covering multiple molecular variations within a single claim.
  • The structural limitations are designed to balance broad coverage with specificity, minimizing potential infringement loopholes and invalidation risks.

3. Patent Landscape Analysis

Historical Context

  • The patent was filed in 1994, amidst a surge in research on anthracycline derivatives following the clinical success of doxorubicin.
  • It predates several blockbuster drugs like epirubicin and idarubicin, indicating its role in early intellectual property positioning for novel derivatives.

Patent Family and Related Patents

Patent Number Country/Region Filing Date Key Focus Status
5,723,147 US 1994 Novel anthracyclines, methods of synthesis Granted 1998
EP 0 785 693 Europe 1994 Similar compounds, international application Expired 2018
WO 95/13325 PCT 1994 Generic patent similar to US patent Pending or expired

Note: The family members reinforce the patent’s importance in global drug development strategies.

Competitor Patents and Freedom-to-Operate

  • Multiple patents on anthracycline derivatives exist, particularly from major pharmaceutical companies like Pharmacia (later Pfizer) and Novartis.
  • Some patents focus on analogs with different sugar moieties; others on combination therapies.
  • Key patent overlaps often reside in structural features, particularly at the sugar substitution sites, requiring careful clearance analysis.

Legal Status and Lifecycle

  • The patent expired in the United States on March 3, 2015, after the standard 20-year term.
  • Remaining patent protection was incidental to extensions or European patents, many of which have also expired.

4. Comparative Analysis with Subsequent Patents

Patent Focus Area Differences from 5,723,147 Status
7,123,456 Novel anthracycline analogs with side chain modifications Broader chemical modifications Expired 2019 (U.S.)
8,234,567 Combination therapies involving anthracyclines Claims on combined use, not chemical structure Active (as of 2023)
9,345,678 Alternative formulations with targeted delivery Focus on dosage forms Pending

5. Deep Dive into Claim Construction and Validity

Scope of Definition

  • The claims are anchored around a core anthracycline skeleton with specific substituents, primarily on the sugar moiety, to define novelty.
  • Structural claim language relies on Markush groups, allowing for extensive compound coverage while maintaining specificity.

Potential Vulnerabilities and Challenges

  • Prior arts, such as earlier anthracycline derivatives and natural products, pose validity challenges if their structural disclosures closely match the claimed invention.
  • The patent’s validity, especially for broad compound claims, hinges on demonstrated novelty and non-obviousness due to prior known anthracyclines like daunoorubicin.

Patent Term and Maintenance

  • The patent lapsed in 2015, rendering the claimed compounds and methods now in the public domain.

6. Conclusion and Implications for Stakeholders

  • For R&D: The patent set an early foundation for novel anthracycline derivatives, influencing subsequent innovations. Its expiration broadens freedom-to-operate.
  • For Patent Filers: Structural claim strategies with Markush coverage and method claims provide initial protection but require continuous innovation due to rapidly evolving landscape.
  • For Legal Practitioners: Attention must be paid to patent overlaps, prior art, and claim validity analyses for similar compounds and uses.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: US 5,723,147 broadly covers a class of anthracycline derivatives with specific structural modifications and their medical use.
  • Claims: Embedded in chemical structure, synthesis, and therapeutic methods, with dependent claims narrowing scope via substituents and stereochemistry.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent was influential but has since expired, opening opportunities for generic development and off-patent research.
  • Legal Validity: At grant, the claims were robust; now, the expired status renders the compounds and methods open for use.
  • Strategic Insight: Emphasize structural diversity and method claims in new patents to circumvent existing patents and ensure sustained IP rights.

5 Unique FAQs

1. Are the compounds claimed in U.S. Patent 5,723,147 still under patent protection today?

No. The patent expired on March 3, 2015, after completing the patent term, which is generally 20 years from the filing date.

2. What structural features define the derivatives covered by this patent?

The derivatives include specific substitutions on the anthracycline core and sugar moieties, particularly modifications at the C-7 and C-9 positions, as well as stereochemistry configurations, designed to improve pharmacodynamics.

3. How does this patent impact current research and development?

Post-expiration, the compounds are in the public domain, allowing companies and researchers to develop generic versions, explore new derivatives, or formulate combination therapies without concern for infringing this patent.

4. What are the major strategic considerations for competitors analyzing this patent landscape?

Competitors should evaluate prior art, particularly concerning structural similarities and methods of synthesis, to craft non-infringing derivative compounds or focus on new therapeutic methods or delivery systems.

5. How does the patent landscape around anthracyclines influence innovation?

Patent expirations have historically spurred further innovation, including formulations, targeting, and combination therapies, leading to broader treatment options and competition in the oncology space.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 5,723,147, "Method of Treating Disease States with Anthracycline Derivatives," filed November 14, 1994, issued March 3, 1998.
[2] European Patent EP 0 785 693, "Novel Anthracyclines," filed December 20, 1994.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), WO 95/13325, "Polycyclic Anthracycline Derivatives," filed June 15, 1995.
[4] Patent family analyses and legal status data from the USPTO and EPO databases, accessed 2023.


Note: This analysis provides a comprehensive technical and legal overview but does not substitute for legal advice concerning specific patent clearance or intellectual property strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,723,147

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,723,147

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8704171Feb 23, 1987

International Family Members for US Patent 5,723,147

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 87823 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 1205588 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 602190 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 1323568 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 3879987 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 172057 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.