Share This Page
Details for Patent: 5,648,333
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 5,648,333
| Title: | Peptides having bradykinin antagonist action | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | Peptides of the formula IA-B-C-E-F-K-P-G-M-F'-I(I),wherein the terms A, B, C, E, F, K, P, G, M, F', and I are defined in the specification, have bradykinin antagonist action. Their therapeutic utility includes all pathological states which are mediated, caused or supported by bradykinin and bradykinin-related peptides. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Stephan Henke, Hiristo Anagnostopulos, Gerhard Breipohl, Jochen Knolle, Jens Stechl, Bernward Scholkens, Hans-Wolfram Fehlhaber, Hermann Gerhards, Franz Hock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | Sanofi Aventis Deutschland GmbH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US08/487,442 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Composition; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | US Patent 5,648,333: Icatibant Bradykinin Antagonist Claims, Scope, Expiration, and Patent LandscapeUS Patent No. 5,648,333 covers a broad family of synthetic bradykinin B2-receptor antagonists, including the icatibant peptide sequence used in Firazyr. Its strongest commercial claim is claim 14, which specifically covers icatibant and its physiologically tolerable salts. The patent also claims related peptide genera, D-Phe analogues, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic methods for bradykinin-mediated conditions, including hereditary angioedema and asthma. The patent issued on July 15, 1997, from a Hoechst-originated peptide program. Its 20-year US patent term expired in 2014, subject to any applicable patent-term adjustment or terminal disclaimer. The patent therefore does not currently block generic or follow-on development on its own. Its historical importance is substantial because it contains direct claims to icatibant, but its present value is primarily prior-art, freedom-to-operate, and patent-landscape value rather than enforceable exclusivity. What drug and technology does US Patent 5,648,333 protect?US 5,648,333 protects peptide antagonists of bradykinin, a vasoactive peptide involved in vascular permeability, inflammation, pain, bronchoconstriction, hypotension, and angioedema. The core architecture is represented by formula I:
The claimed molecules are synthetic peptides containing:
The structure is designed to reproduce key spatial and charge characteristics of bradykinin while preventing productive receptor activation. The D-amino-acid and constrained heterocyclic residues increase resistance to enzymatic degradation and impose a receptor-binding conformation. Which claims specifically cover icatibant?Claim 14 is the principal direct composition-of-matter claim for icatibant. Icatibant is:
The claim covers that peptide and physiologically tolerable salts. Firazyr is marketed as icatibant acetate, a subcutaneous injection for acute attacks of hereditary angioedema. The claim structure is narrowed through a series of dependent claims:
Claims 12 and 13 also include icatibant-related analogues. Claim 14 is the cleanest sequence-specific protection because it does not depend on a longer list of alternatives. How broad are the independent peptide claims?The broadest protection is claim 1. It is a Markush claim covering a large number of peptide permutations rather than one commercial molecule. Its breadth comes from four sources:
The claim is technically broad but structurally dense. A potential infringer would need to practice every required limitation. A peptide that omits the required P segment, changes the configuration of a critical residue, uses a materially different central sequence, or falls outside the specified heterocyclic definitions may avoid literal infringement. The dependent claims materially improve enforcement clarity by reducing the number of permitted alternatives. Claims 10-14 are commercially more important than claim 1 because they identify discrete bradykinin-antagonist sequences and the icatibant structure. What does claim 15 add to the patent?Claims 15-24 create a second peptide genus. The principal distinction is that P is D-phenylalanine rather than D-Tic. Claim 15 therefore covers:
where G is a larger heterocyclic bicyclic or tricyclic radical. Claims 16-20 narrow the permitted amino acids and ring systems. Claims 21-24 list specific D-Phe-containing compounds. Examples include:
These compounds are distinct from icatibant because the protected sequence incorporates D-Phe in the P position, while icatibant contains D-Tic. Claims 15-24 expand the patent beyond the commercial icatibant species and may be relevant to historical analogues, research compounds and sequence-based prior-art analysis. What therapeutic uses are claimed?Claims 25-33 cover methods and pharmaceutical compositions directed to bradykinin-mediated pathological conditions. The listed conditions include:
Claims 25 and 28 cover treatment methods using the broad peptide genera of claims 1 and 15. Claims 26 and 29 specifically recite asthma treatment. Claims 31-33 are directed to the compound of claim 24. The method claims are narrower than the composition claims because they require administration for a listed bradykinin-related condition. They do not restore exclusivity to the expired composition claims. Their practical value depends on enforceability, disclosure support, claim construction and whether the relevant treatment indication was separately protected by a later unexpired patent. What is the commercial relevance to Firazyr and hereditary angioedema?Icatibant is the active pharmaceutical ingredient in Firazyr. The FDA approved Firazyr in 2011 for acute attacks of hereditary angioedema in adults. The product is administered by subcutaneous injection and acts as a selective bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist. FDA labeling identifies icatibant acetate as the active ingredient and describes the product as a prefilled syringe containing 30 mg of icatibant acetate solution. [2] US 5,648,333 is important because claim 14 directly names the icatibant sequence. The patent, however, predates the commercial product by more than a decade and expired before the modern generic-entry period for icatibant. The product’s commercial protection depended on more than this patent. Relevant layers can include:
When did US Patent 5,648,333 lose exclusivity?The patent issued July 15, 1997. Under the post-1995 US patent-term regime, the baseline term is 20 years from the earliest effective nonprovisional US filing date, subject to patent-term adjustment, terminal disclaimers and statutory exceptions. The patent expired in 2014 based on the underlying family chronology. [1] The practical timeline is:
Patent expiry does not invalidate the underlying technical disclosure. It places the claimed subject matter into the public domain, subject to separate rights in later patent families. What is the Orange Book status of US 5,648,333?US 5,648,333 is not an enforceable current Orange Book barrier because it expired in 2014. Historical listing status must be distinguished from current patent enforceability. FDA Orange Book listings identify patents submitted by an NDA holder for an approved product, but an Orange Book listing does not extend an expired patent or establish infringement. [3] For icatibant, the relevant regulatory analysis should separate:
A generic applicant can challenge listed patents through an Abbreviated New Drug Application. A Paragraph IV certification alleges that a listed patent is invalid, unenforceable or not infringed. If the NDA holder sues within the statutory period, FDA approval may be subject to a 30-month stay under the Hatch-Waxman framework, subject to statutory exceptions and later court action. [4] Which companies challenged icatibant exclusivity?The main commercial competition has involved generic and alternative icatibant development rather than biosimilar competition. Icatibant is a synthetic peptide, not a biologic produced through a biologics license application. Biosimilar rules under the Public Health Service Act are therefore generally not the primary pathway. The relevant competitor category is generic or hybrid peptide-drug development. Known commercial participants have included:
A definitive list of Paragraph IV filers and litigation outcomes requires review of FDA patent-listing records, ANDA litigation dockets and district-court filings. The expired status of US 5,648,333 means that any later dispute would more likely concern separate patents, regulatory exclusivity, formulation differences or manufacturing issues. How strong is the patent estate for icatibant?The strength of US 5,648,333 is high as historical composition-of-matter prior art and low as current exclusionary rights because the patent has expired.
What manufacturing and formulation barriers remain?The claims do not recite a specific injectable formulation, excipient system, container, device or sterile-filling process. They are principally composition, treatment-method and pharmaceutical-composition claims. A follow-on manufacturer still must address:
These issues may raise development cost and regulatory risk without preserving exclusivity under US 5,648,333. What geographic coverage did the patent have?US 5,648,333 provides protection only in the United States. The related invention was pursued through an international patent family, with corresponding rights potentially filed in Europe and other jurisdictions. Foreign rights required separate analysis because:
The US patent cannot be used to establish freedom to operate in Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia or other markets. What generic launch scenarios exist for icatibant?Three launch scenarios are commercially relevant:
Because US 5,648,333 expired in 2014, it is not the principal barrier to any current US generic launch. The decisive issues are later patent families, FDA requirements for the synthetic peptide injection, manufacturing scale and supply reliability. Key Takeaways
FAQs About US Patent 5,648,333 and IcatibantIs icatibant explicitly claimed in US 5,648,333?Yes. Claim 14 expressly recites the icatibant peptide sequence and its physiologically tolerable salts. Does US 5,648,333 still block generic Firazyr?No. The patent expired in 2014 and does not independently block a current generic icatibant product. Is icatibant a biologic subject to biosimilar approval?No. Icatibant is a chemically synthesized peptide. A generic or hybrid drug pathway is generally more relevant than the biosimilar pathway. Do the claims cover icatibant acetate?Claim 14 covers icatibant and physiologically tolerable salts. Icatibant acetate is the salt form used in Firazyr. Do the claims cover injectable formulations?Claims 27, 30 and 33 cover pharmaceutical compositions containing claimed peptides and a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle. They do not specify the detailed Firazyr formulation or a particular prefilled-syringe system. What is the principal current patent risk for a generic icatibant product?The principal risk comes from later patents covering formulation, manufacturing, delivery devices, regulatory exclusivity or other product-specific features. US 5,648,333 itself is expired. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,648,333
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,648,333
| Foriegn Application Priority Data | ||
| Foreign Country | Foreign Patent Number | Foreign Patent Date |
| Germany | 38 39 581.9 | Nov 24, 1988 |
| Germany | 39 16 291.5 | May 19, 1989 |
| Germany | 39 26 225.8 | Jun 03, 1989 |
| Germany | 39 26 822.5 | Aug 14, 1989 |
| Germany | 40 13 270.6 | Apr 26, 1990 |
International Family Members for US Patent 5,648,333
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| European Patent Office | 0370453 | ⤷ Start Trial | 91499 | Luxembourg | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 0370453 | ⤷ Start Trial | 300359 | Netherlands | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 0370453 | ⤷ Start Trial | 09C0002 | France | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 0370453 | ⤷ Start Trial | SPC/GB09/002 | United Kingdom | ⤷ Start Trial |
| European Patent Office | 0370453 | ⤷ Start Trial | C300359 | Netherlands | ⤷ Start Trial |
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
