Share This Page
Details for Patent: 5,633,008
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 5,633,008
| Title: | Method of administering nicotine transdermally | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | A method of administering nicotine transdermally in which a nicotine patch, capable of administering nicotine for at least 16 hours at rates that are efficacious in smoking cessation therapy, is applied in the morning upon waking and removed prior to sleep. This method is effective even though nicotine is not essential during sleep and many smokers experience morning craving. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | James L. Osborne, Melinda K. Nelson, David J. Enscore, Su I. Yum, Robert M. Gale, Donna D. Causey | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | Alza Corp | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US08/105,262 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Use; Device; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | US Patent 5,633,008: Scope, Claims, Expiration, and Nicotine Patch Patent LandscapeUS Patent 5,633,008 covers a specific 16-hour nicotine transdermal treatment regimen, not nicotine patches generally. Its claims require morning application, use during waking hours, removal before sleep, and, in narrower claims, defined nicotine delivery rates, flux limits, and reservoir activity characteristics. The patent issued on May 27, 1997, and its enforceable term has expired. It therefore does not create a current U.S. barrier to generic, OTC-monograph, or prescription nicotine patch products. What does US Patent 5,633,008 protect?The patent protects a method of administering nicotine through a transdermal device for approximately 16 hours. Claim 1 is the controlling independent claim. It requires all of the following elements:
The claim is directed to a dosing regimen combined with a transdermal delivery device. It does not broadly claim every nicotine patch, every nicotine formulation, or every method of smoking cessation. The patent's core distinction is the use of a daytime-only patch. The regimen avoids continuous overnight nicotine exposure, which was associated with sleep disturbance and vivid dreams in some nicotine replacement therapy users. What is the claim hierarchy?
Claims 2 through 9 depend on claim 1. A product or method that does not satisfy claim 1 cannot infringe the dependent claims. How should claim 1 be construed?Claim 1 contains both regimen and device limitations. A patch must not merely contain nicotine. It must have a reservoir with sufficient nicotine capacity to maintain a useful flux for at least 16 hours. "Upon waking" and "before sleep"These limitations create a defined temporal regimen. A product used continuously for 24 hours does not automatically satisfy the claimed removal-before-sleep requirement. Likewise, a patch applied at an arbitrary time would raise a claim-construction issue because the claim expressly requires application upon waking. The terms are functional and contextual rather than fixed clock times. Application at 7:00 a.m. and removal at approximately 11:00 p.m. would fit the ordinary 16-hour regimen. Application at noon and removal at 4:00 a.m. would be less consistent with the claim because removal would occur after the normal sleep period. "Useful transdermal flux"The phrase is not defined solely by a fixed numerical rate in claim 1. The dependent claims provide numerical delivery ranges, but claim 1 uses a functional standard. A technical infringement analysis would examine patch design, in vitro release data, in vivo delivery data, and whether the reservoir remains capable of delivering nicotine over the claimed period. Reservoir versus matrix constructionThe claims repeatedly refer to a nicotine reservoir. That language may distinguish a reservoir-type system from some matrix systems, depending on the patent specification and the specific construction adopted by a court. A matrix patch that contains nicotine distributed through a polymer may not be equivalent to a discrete reservoir in every case. The distinction is important because modern nicotine patches commonly use matrix designs, while older transdermal systems included reservoir structures, rate-controlling membranes, adhesives, and backing layers. What do claims 3 through 6 protect?Claims 3 through 6 add quantitative delivery restrictions. Claim 3 covers an administration rate of approximately 250 to 4,000 micrograms per hour during a substantial portion of the treatment period. This range spans low-dose and higher-dose nicotine patch products. Claims 4 and 5 limit average flux by patch area:
The claims distinguish total administration rate from flux. Administration rate is measured in micrograms per hour. Flux is measured by area, in micrograms per square centimeter per hour. A large patch and a small patch could deliver the same total dose while producing different flux values. Claim 6 requires the administration rate to remain substantially constant during a substantial portion of the administration period. This limitation favors controlled-release systems and may exclude products with a pronounced initial burst followed by rapid decline, depending on the data and claim construction. What do claims 7 through 9 protect?Claims 7 through 9 focus on nicotine thermodynamic activity and reservoir loading. A subsaturated reservoir has a nicotine activity below 1.0. In simplified terms, the reservoir contains less nicotine than the maximum amount that could be dissolved or maintained under the relevant formulation conditions. The claim does not require the reservoir to be saturated. It requires sufficient initial loading to prevent excessive loss of nicotine activity during the 16-hour period.
These claims are formulation- and performance-dependent. A party evaluating potential exposure would need formulation composition, initial loading, activity measurements, reservoir equilibrium data, and post-use analysis. The limitations may be difficult to establish from public product labeling alone. They generally require technical testing or discovery. They also create design-around opportunities. A manufacturer could use a different nicotine concentration, a matrix rather than a reservoir, a different delivery mechanism, or a profile that does not satisfy the specified activity conditions. When did US Patent 5,633,008 expire?US Patent 5,633,008 issued May 27, 1997. Its term ran under the 20-year framework measured from the applicable nonprovisional filing or priority date under 35 U.S.C. § 154. Public U.S. patent records identify the patent as expired, with the term ending in the 2014 period. The patent is therefore not an enforceable U.S. exclusion right today.[1][2]
The expiration applies to the patent's claims. It does not automatically eliminate other patents covering a particular nicotine patch, adhesive, manufacturing process, packaging system, or brand. What is the Orange Book status of US Patent 5,633,008?US Patent 5,633,008 is not a current Orange Book barrier to nicotine patch products. Orange Book listing is tied to patents submitted for approved drug products under FDA regulations. A patent's existence or historical relationship to a nicotine patch does not itself establish a current Orange Book listing.[3] Nicotine replacement products also occupy a mixed regulatory position:
Are there Paragraph IV challenges to this patent?There is no current Paragraph IV risk associated with US Patent 5,633,008 because the patent has expired. A Paragraph IV certification is relevant when an ANDA applicant seeks approval before expiration of a listed patent. The patent's expired status removes the statutory delay and litigation leverage that would have existed during its enforceable term.[4] Historical ANDA or patent disputes involving nicotine patches could have concerned other patents, including formulation, adhesive, delivery-rate, or device patents. Those disputes would not revive US Patent 5,633,008. What patent landscape surrounds 16-hour nicotine patches?The relevant landscape has four technical groups. Earlier transdermal nicotine patentsEarlier patents addressed the basic concept of delivering nicotine through the skin, including nicotine reservoirs, permeation enhancers, adhesives, backing layers, and controlled-release systems. Those patents established the technical foundation for nicotine patches but have generally expired because they date from the 1980s and early 1990s. Regimen patentsUS Patent 5,633,008 is primarily a regimen patent. Its commercial concept is the daytime, approximately 16-hour patch rather than a continuous 24-hour system. A regimen patent can be commercially important while active because a product label, patient instructions, and ordinary use can directly map to the claimed steps. Once expired, however, the regimen becomes available for unrestricted use unless another active patent covers the product. Formulation and reservoir patentsOther patent families may cover:
Claims 7 through 9 of US 5,633,008 belong to this formulation-performance category, but they are narrower than a generic claim to nicotine in a transdermal patch. Manufacturing and device patentsManufacturing IP may cover coating, laminating, die-cutting, pouching, reservoir filling, solvent removal, and quality-control methods. Those rights can remain relevant to freedom-to-operate even when a core use patent has expired. How does US Patent 5,633,008 compare with 24-hour nicotine patch protection?
A 24-hour patch used continuously would generally not practice the full claimed daytime regimen because it would remain in place during sleep. A 16-hour patch used from waking until bedtime is the direct commercial embodiment of the claimed method. What is the current litigation and settlement status?US Patent 5,633,008 has no present litigation significance because its claims are expired. There is no current infringement remedy, injunction risk, or Paragraph IV settlement value attributable to this patent. Historical disputes involving nicotine replacement products may have addressed other patents or regulatory issues. A settlement involving a separate nicotine patch patent would not extend the term of US Patent 5,633,008 and would not create new exclusivity for its expired claims. Which companies face competitive risk from this patent estate?The patent does not create current competitive risk for manufacturers of nicotine patches. The commercial landscape includes branded and private-label products marketed through OTC nicotine replacement channels, prescription products where available, and contract manufacturers supplying pharmacy and retail brands. Competitive differentiation now depends more heavily on:
The expired patent may still be relevant in historical diligence because it explains the intellectual-property basis for a daytime nicotine patch. It is not a current royalty or launch constraint. What generic launch scenarios exist?OTC-monograph launchA compliant nicotine patch can be marketed under the applicable FDA OTC framework without relying on an active patent term for this regimen. The manufacturer must satisfy the monograph, labeling, quality, manufacturing, and postmarket requirements. ANDA launchIf a product is positioned as a generic version of an approved prescription nicotine patch, the applicant may use the ANDA pathway. Because US Patent 5,633,008 is expired, it cannot support a Paragraph IV delay. 505(b)(2) launchA modified nicotine transdermal product with a different delivery profile, dosage form, or clinical labeling could use a 505(b)(2) strategy where appropriate. The relevant regulatory exclusivity and patent analysis would focus on the reference product and any other listed patents, not on US Patent 5,633,008. Key Takeaways
FAQs About US Patent 5,633,008Does US Patent 5,633,008 cover all nicotine patches?No. It covers a defined method using a transdermal nicotine reservoir, morning application, waking-hour use, and removal before sleep. It does not cover every nicotine patch or every nicotine formulation. Can a 24-hour nicotine patch infringe US Patent 5,633,008?A continuously worn 24-hour patch would not ordinarily satisfy the claim's requirement that the device be removed before sleep. Other patents could still be relevant. Does the patent cover nicotine gum, lozenges, or inhalers?No. The claims require transdermal administration through a device applied to the skin. Oral and inhaled nicotine products fall outside the claimed delivery route. Is a subsaturated nicotine reservoir required for every claim?No. The subsaturated-reservoir limitation appears only in claims 7 through 9. Claims 1 through 6 do not expressly require a subsaturated reservoir, although claim 1 requires a nicotine reservoir. Can a company rely on patent expiration to avoid FDA requirements?No. Patent expiration removes the patent exclusion right. It does not remove FDA requirements governing OTC-monograph compliance, NDA approval, ANDA approval, manufacturing quality, labeling, or product safety. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,633,008
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
International Family Members for US Patent 5,633,008
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 161734 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 3852189 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 3913695 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 4491193 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 630614 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 666208 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
