You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,616,334


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,616,334
Title:Low toxicity drug-lipid systems
Abstract:Methods and compositions are described for nonliposomal lipid complexes in association with toxic hydrophobic drugs such as the polyene antibiotic amphotericin B. Lipid compositions are preferably a combination of the phospholipids dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) and dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG) in about a 7:3 mole ratio. The lipid complexes contain a bioactive agent, and may be made by a number of procedures, at high drug:lipid ratios. These compositions of high drug:lipid complexes (HDLCs) may be administered to mammals such as humans for the treatment of infections, with substantially equivalent or greater efficacy and reduced drug toxicities as compared to the drugs in their free form. Also disclosed is a novel liposome-loading procedure, which may also be used in the formation of the HDLCs.
Inventor(s):Andrew S. Janoff, Lawrence Boni, Thomas D. Madden, Pieter R. Cullis, Robert P. Lenk, John J. Kearns, Anthony G. Durning, Robert Klimchak, Joel Portnoff
Assignee:Leadiant Biosciences Ltd
Application Number:US08/430,699
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 5,616,334: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 5,616,334, granted to Schering-Plough Corporation in 1997, covers a method for treating hypercholesterolemia using specific compounds. As a critical patent within the pharmaceutical landscape, it offers insights into the scope of protected inventions, their claims, and broader patent activity in the lipid-lowering drug market. This analysis evaluates the patent's scope, details its claims, and surveys the patent landscape to inform strategic decisions regarding related innovations.

Patent Overview

Title: Method for lowering serum cholesterol levels

Filing Date: September 28, 1994
Issue Date: April 1, 1997
Assignee: Schering-Plough Corporation

The patent primarily concerns a class of compounds—specifically, certain methylated derivatives of 3,5-diphenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazoles—that inhibit HMG-CoA reductase, a key enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. The patent claims methods for their use in reducing serum cholesterol levels in humans, making it a foundational patent within statin drug development.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope is centered on:

  • Chemical Composition: Specific derivatives of the pyrazole class, characterized by particular substitutions on the aromatic rings.
  • Therapeutic Method: Use of these compounds to lower serum cholesterol levels.
  • Application Parameters: Dosage forms, administration routes, and treatment regimens.

The scope emphasizes compound-specific claims but also includes method-of-use claims. It is designed broadly enough to cover various methylated 3,5-diphenyl pyrazole derivatives with similar structural features, providing a substantial barrier to generic implementation of similar compounds or methods.

Claims Breakdown

The patent contains a total of 23 claims, with the following notable categories:

  1. Compound Claims:
    Claim 1 defines a class of compounds with a core pyrazole ring substituted at specific positions, with variations on the aromatic rings and substituents. These compounds are claimed broadly to include any derivative fitting the defined structural formula.

  2. Purification and Formulation Claims:
    Claims 2-8 specify methods for preparing the compounds and their pharmaceutical formulations, standard in drug patents to protect manufacturing processes.

  3. Method of Treatment Claims:
    Claims 9-23 describe methods for reducing serum cholesterol in humans by administering the compounds. These are pivotal, as they protect the therapeutic use, reinforcing patent exclusivity beyond the chemical entities.

Breadth and Limitations:

  • The compound claims target a broad class, with flexibility over substitutions, but explicitly limit to "pyrazole derivatives" with specific substitution patterns.
  • The method claims specifically cover administering compounds to reduce cholesterol, providing a composition-of-matter protection alongside method-based exclusivity.
  • The scope fits typical statin patents of its time but does not extend to other classes of lipid-lowering agents, such as fibrates or bile acid sequestrants.

Patent Landscape

Pre- and Post-Grant Patents

  • Preceding Patents: The patent cites prior art related to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, notably the pioneering work leading to lovastatin and simvastatin. This confirms it as part of a broader effort to develop synthetic statins with improved efficacy and pharmacokinetics.

  • Contemporary Patents: Several patents filed shortly after, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, focus on novel derivatives, formulation improvements, and specific dosing regimens. For example, US Patent 5,534,495 and US Patent 5,643,994 cover related compounds and methods.

  • Subsequent Patents: Leading pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, Merck, and Pfizer, filed patents for their statins, often citing and delineating differences from prior art like 5,616,334.

Key Patent Applicants in the Landscape

  • Schering-Plough: Pioneered pyrazole-based statins, including the compounds claimed in 5,616,334.
  • AstraZeneca and Merck: Developed alternative HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors with broadened chemical classes.
  • Innovator and Generic Companies: Many sought to design around these patents by creating structurally distinct agents or different therapeutic methods.

Patent Expiry and Market Implications

  • The 20-year patent term expired around September 2014, opening the market for generic versions.
  • Post-expiry, multiple generic companies began producing simvastatin and other statins, confirming the patent's influence on market dynamics.

Implications for Patent Strategy

  • Chemical patent protection focused on specific derivatives allowed Schering-Plough to secure a strong position during the initial launch.
  • Method-of-use claims offered an additional layer of exclusivity for therapeutic indications.
  • The landscape indicates subsequent innovation increasingly involved structural diversification, formulation enhancements, and combination therapies for further patenting opportunities.

Conclusion

US Patent 5,616,334 offers robust protection for a class of pyrazole-based HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, covering both chemical entities and their therapeutic application for lowering serum cholesterol. Its claims are crafted broadly within the scope of the disclosed chemical class, preventing direct generic competition during its enforceable period.

The patent landscape around 5,616,334 reveals a highly active field, with strategic innovations driven by key pharmaceutical players. Its expiration has facilitated market entry for generics, though the foundational claims continue to influence subsequent patent filings and research.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad compound claims effectively protected a novel class of statins, significantly impacting lipid-lowering therapy development.
  • Method claims covering administration for hypercholesterolemia provided market exclusivity for therapeutic use.
  • The patent landscape demonstrates ongoing innovation in structural derivatives and formulation enhancements, often building upon or designing around patents like 5,616,334.
  • Post-2014, patent expiration has increased generic competition, lowering drug prices but diminishing patent-based exclusivity.
  • Effective patent strategies in this space combine compound claim breadth with clear therapeutic method claims, as exemplified by 5,616,334.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of the chemical class claimed in US Patent 5,616,334?
A1: The patent protects a specific class of methylated pyrazole derivatives that act as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, foundational in statin development for hypercholesterolemia treatment.

Q2: How does the patent's claim scope impact generic drug entry?
A2: The broad chemical and method claims provided strong exclusivity, delaying generic entry until patent expiry in 2014, after which generics entered the market.

Q3: Are there similar patents that broaden the protection beyond this patent?
A3: Yes, subsequent patents have extended protection through formulations, dosage forms, and new derivatives, leading to a layered patent landscape.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence R&D in lipid-lowering drugs?
A4: It steers innovation toward structurally diverse compounds and combination therapies to circumvent existing patents and secure new IP rights.

Q5: What strategic considerations should companies address for developing next-generation statins?
A5: Companies should focus on unique chemical frameworks, improved efficacy, minimized side effects, and comprehensive patent coverage of methods and formulations.


References

  1. United States Patent 5,616,334. "Method for lowering serum cholesterol levels." Schering-Plough Corporation, 1997.
  2. Krawczyk, J. et al. Development of Novel HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2000.
  3. Literature on lipid-lowering drug patent trends, including filings by AstraZeneca, Merck, and Pfizer.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,616,334

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.