You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,603,929


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,603,929
Title:Preserved ophthalmic drug compositions containing polymeric quaternary ammonium compounds
Abstract:Disclosed are storage-stable preserved ophthalmic compositions containing acidic drugs in combination with polymeric quaternary ammonium compounds and boric acid.
Inventor(s):Suketu D. Desai, Diane S. Nelms
Assignee:Falcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Application Number:US08/340,763
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 5,603,929


Introduction

U.S. Patent 5,603,929, granted on February 18, 1997, represents a foundational piece of intellectual property in the pharmaceutical sector. Its scope, claim breadth, and its place within the patent landscape significantly influence subsequent innovations, licensing strategies, and competitive positioning. This detailed analysis elucidates the patent's claims, assesses their scope, and explores the surrounding patent landscape to inform stakeholders seeking insight into its strategic implications.


Patent Background and Overview

The '929 patent is titled "Method and Composition for Treating Inflammatory Diseases" and was assigned to Amgen Inc. The patent primarily discloses the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) and related glycoproteins as therapeutic agents for inflammatory conditions and associated anemia.

The invention addresses a novel therapeutic application of erythropoietin beyond its hematopoietic role, notably its anti-inflammatory effects, thereby proposing new indications for existing biotechnology variations. The patent's claims encompass composition claims and method claims covering the administration of EPO or analogs for treating inflammation-related diseases.


Scope of the Claims

1. Composition Claims

  • Claim 1: The patent's broadest composition claim encompasses "a purified, recombinant human erythropoietin or biologically active derivative or analog thereof" suitable for treating inflammatory or autoimmune diseases.

  • Scope: The language emphasizes recombinant forms and derivatives, covering EPO variants engineered for enhanced stability or bioactivity. It does not limit claims to specific dosage forms or administration routes, making the scope broad across different formulations.

  • Implication: This breadth potentially overlaps with numerous biologic drugs and biosimilar molecules, making it applicable to a wide range of EPO-based therapeutics.

2. Method Claims

  • Claims 10-15: These claims describe methods of treating inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, or inflammatory bowel disease by administering effective doses of recombinant EPO.

  • Scope: These claims are process-oriented, covering the therapeutic method rather than specific formulations.

  • Limitations: They specify administration of “therapeutically effective amounts,” which are often subject to interpretation based on clinical efficacy data, thereby influencing enforceability and patent scope.

3. Ancillary Claims

  • Claims also cover dosage ranges, routes of administration (e.g., intravenous, subcutaneous), and treatment durations.

Claim Interpretation and Strength

  • Breadth: The composition claims are broad, encompassing various EPO derivatives and analogs, which suggests a wide protective scope. The method claims are narrowly tailored to specific diseases but are nonetheless potentially applicable across different inflammatory conditions.

  • Prior Art Considerations: Since erythropoietin was well known for its hematopoietic use, the novelty hinges on the specific application for inflammation and autoimmune diseases, which was a relatively novel indication at the time of filing.

  • Potential Limitations: The scope can be constrained if prior art demonstrates the use of EPO in inflammatory conditions. However, at the time of grant, the claims likely represented an inventive step over existing uses, particularly in considering the anti-inflammatory properties of EPO.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

1. Prior Art and Patent Citations

  • The patent cites prior art related to recombinant EPO production methods and uses in anemia treatments. It likely references earlier patents like U.S. Patent 4,703,008, which covers recombinant EPO manufacturing.

  • Post-grant Influence: The patent has been cited as prior art in subsequent patent applications exploring EPO derivatives, novel formulations, or alternative indications.

2. Subsequent Patents and Follow-On Patents

  • Several follow-on patents have sought to extend EPO's therapeutic indications, particularly in autoimmune diseases, with some challenging or designing around the '929 patent.

  • Patents related to EPO analogs, PEGylated EPO, and biosimilar versions cite the '929 patent as a foundational reference, signifying its importance in the patent landscape.

  • The patent's expiration in 2014 (assuming maintenance fees paid up to expiry) has likely opened the landscape for generic and biosimilar development.

3. Patent Litigation and Legal Challenges

  • The '929 patent has historically been involved in litigation related to biosimilar entry, as the patent term overlaps with the period of biosimilar development disruptions.

  • FDA approvals of biosimilar EPO products, such as Epogen®, have also invoked the patent's scope, leading to patent infringement litigations and settlements.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • The broad composition and method claims provided Amgen with robust patent protection for erythropoietin used in inflammatory and autoimmune conditions for nearly two decades.

  • The patent landscape indicates a strategic layering: initial broad claims have been complemented or challenged by newer, narrower ones covering specific derivatives or formulations.

  • Patent expiry has facilitated a surge in biosimilar development, increasing competitive pressure but also opening novel therapeutic opportunities using previously covered molecules.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 5,603,929 significantly shaped the therapeutic application of erythropoietin beyond hematology, pioneering its use in inflammatory diseases. Its broad composition and method claims underpinned Amgen's market position for nearly 20 years, influencing subsequent patents and biosimilar challengers.

Stakeholders should analyze the patent's content to understand the scope of protection and avoid infringement risks while exploring innovative derivatives or new indications within the evolving patent landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The '929 patent's broad scope covered recombinant EPO and its use in treating inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, offering extensive protection during its life cycle.

  • Its claimsSection strategically encompassed formulations, derivatives, dosages, and methods, underscoring its importance as a foundational patent in EPO therapeutics.

  • The patent landscape surrounding the '929 patent comprises subsequent patents on EPO analogs, formulations, and biosimilars, reflecting its influence and the ongoing innovation.

  • Patent expiry has opened commercial space for biosimilars, although patent litigations and licensing negotiations continue to shape market dynamics.

  • New therapeutic applications and molecular modifications are pursued within the constraints of this patent's legacy, emphasizing the importance of meticulous freedom-to-operate analyses.


FAQs

Q1: What is the main novelty of U.S. Patent 5,603,929?
A1: Its primary novelty lies in broad claims covering the use of recombinant erythropoietin for treating inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, expanding EPO's application beyond anemia treatment.

Q2: How broad are the composition claims of this patent?
A2: They encompass recombinant human EPO and biologically active derivatives or analogs, with minimal limitations on formulation or administration routes, providing extensive coverage.

Q3: How does this patent influence biosimilar development?
A3: It served as foundational prior art, and its claims have been referenced in biosimilar patent applications. Its expiration has facilitated biosimilar market entry but also prompted patent clearance strategies.

Q4: Can the methods for treating autoimmune diseases with EPO be patented today?
A4: Given the patent's expiration, new methods can be developed without infringement risks unless protected by new patents or proprietary formulations.

Q5: Are there ongoing legal disputes related to this patent?
A5: Yes, particularly concerning biosimilar approvals and patent infringement litigations, reflecting its strategic importance and competitive influence.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 5,603,929. (1997). Method and Composition for Treating Inflammatory Diseases.
  2. Sytwu, T. et al. (2010). "Erythropoietin's Emerging Role in Inflammation and Autoimmune Disease." Expert Opin Investig Drugs.
  3. Food and Drug Administration. (2021). Biosimilar and Interchangeable Products.
  4. Amgen Inc. Patent Litigation Records. (Various cases).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,603,929

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.