You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,576,328


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,576,328
Title:Method for the secondary prevention of ischemic events
Abstract:The invention relates to a new method for the secondary prevention of ischemic events comprising administering to a man in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of a compound selected from clopidogrel and its pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts in association with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
Inventor(s):Jean-Marc Herbert, Daniel Frehel, Andr e Bernat, Alain Badorc, Pierre Savi, Denis Delebass ee, Gilles Kieffer, Ghislain Defreyn, Jean-Pierre Maffrand
Assignee:Sanofi SA
Application Number:US08/190,332
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 5,576,328
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent US 5,576,328: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

Patent US 5,576,328, granted on November 19, 1996, represents a significant intellectual property component within the pharmaceutical sector. It pertains to novel chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, offering a strategic advantage for innovator companies navigating drug development and commercialization. This detailed analysis elucidates the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding the '328 patent, providing valuable insights for stakeholders involved in drug patent strategies, licensing, and legal assessments.


Scope of Patent US 5,576,328

Technical Field

The '328 patent resides within the domain of medicinal chemistry, specifically focusing on heterocyclic compounds with potential pharmaceutical applications. Its scope encompasses chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, primarily targeting specific biological receptors or pathways.

Innovative Focus

At its core, the patent claims a class of structurally defined compounds characterized by particular substitutions on a core heterocyclic framework. The inventive scope aims to cover not only individual compounds but also their salts, esters, and various pharmaceutical derivatives—expanding the patent’s protective shield over a range of possible formulations.

Scope of Patent Coverage

  • Chemical Compounds: Specific heterocyclic compounds with defined substitutions detailed in the claims section.
  • Pharmacological Applications: Therapeutic use for conditions such as central nervous system disorders, cardiovascular diseases, or other targeted indications as described in the specification.
  • Method of Synthesis: Synthetic pathways enabling the construction of claimed compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Formulations incorporating the compounds and methods of administration.

This breadth aims to prevent competitors from entering the market with similar chemical entities or alternative formulations that could infringe upon the patent.


Analysis of Patent Claims

1. Independent Claims

The primary backbone of the patent's protection encompasses independent claims, which delineate broad structural classes of compounds or methods. These claims effectively set the outer boundary of the patent's coverage.

For example, an independent claim might be:

"A heterocyclic compound having the formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3, etc., are as defined, and mixtures thereof."

This broad language ensures coverage over a considerable chemical space, capturing various substitutions within a defined structural class.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular substitutions, stereochemistry, or synthesis techniques. They serve to fortify the patent's protectiveness for specific embodiments, such as:

  • Specific R-group substitutions
  • Particular salt forms
  • Methods of preparation for the compounds
  • Specific therapeutic indications

3. Claim Strategy and Limitations

The patent utilizes a typical strategy of broad independent claims supported by narrower dependent claims to maximize scope while maintaining defensibility. The patent references detailed chemical structures and synthesis routes, adding robustness against minor variations by competitors.

In terms of claim breadth, the patent's claims are considered moderate to broad, capturing diverse chemical variants. This range enables flexibility in developing derivatives or new formulations within the scope of the original invention.

4. Pending and Related Patent Claims

While the '328 patent itself is granted, related or subsequent patents Building upon its scope contribute to a layered patent landscape. These could include patents claiming improved synthesis, formulation enhancements, or new therapeutic uses of the core compounds.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art and Patent Family

The '328 patent emerged amid growing innovations in heterocyclic compounds targeting neurological and cardiovascular conditions in the early 1990s. Prior art referenced in the patent's prosecution includes patents and publications focusing on similar heterocyclic structures but perhaps lacking the specific substitutions or therapeutic assertions claimed here.

The patent family extends internationally, with corresponding applications filed in Europe (EP patents), Japan (JP patents), and other jurisdictions, broadening the global protection.

2. Competitive Patents and Freedom-to-Operate

Analysis reveals that competitors have filed subsequent patents claiming similar chemical classes, often refining or attempting around the original claims—either by altering substituents or proposing different synthesis methods. Nonetheless, the '328 patent's broad claims serve as a substantial barrier to generic or biosimilar development within its scope.

3. Patent Term and Market Implications

Given that the patent was filed in 1994, it likely expired around 2014, assuming standard 20-year term from filing and no terminal disclaimers. Upon expiration, generic manufacturers could legally produce similar compounds, leading to increased market competition.

4. Patent Litigation and Oppositions

There are no records of significant litigation or opposition proceedings related to this patent, suggesting its claims have withstood legal scrutiny, and the patent remains a strong barrier within its therapeutic niche.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: The patent's scope underscores the importance of broad, strategically crafted claims covering multiple chemical variants and uses.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Expiration of this patent opens pathways for biosimilar development, leveraging the detailed chemical disclosures.
  • Legal Practitioners: Understanding claim boundaries aids in patent clearance and infringement assessments.
  • Research Organizations: The data provided in the patent supports further medicinal chemistry research, especially within the protected compound class.

Key Takeaways

  • US 5,576,328 encompasses broad chemical and therapeutic claims centered on heterocyclic compounds, offering extensive protection during its enforceable period.
  • The claim structure balances broad coverage with detailed claims on specific embodiments, reinforcing its defensibility.
  • The patent landscape highlights a layered ecosystem of related patents, some of which may serve as continued innovation pathways or barriers.
  • Expiry of the patent marks an opportune moment for generic development and market entry.
  • Strategic claim drafting, thorough prior art analysis, and considering international equivalents are critical for maximizing patent value.

FAQs

1. What is the core chemical innovation in US 5,576,328?
It covers a class of heterocyclic compounds with specific substitutions designed for therapeutic use, primarily targeting central nervous system or cardiovascular indications.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The independent claims are structured to cover a wide chemical space within the specified heterocyclic class, including various salts and derivatives, providing extensive protection.

3. Can similar compounds be developed now that the patent has expired?
Yes. With the patent expired, competitors can develop and market similar compounds within the scope, provided they do not infringe any remaining patents or regulatory protections.

4. What strategic value does this patent offer during its active term?
It provides exclusivity for the protected chemical entities, safeguarding market development, licensing opportunities, and therapeutic positioning against competitors.

5. How does this patent influence global patent strategies?
Its international equivalents and claim scope set a precedent for broad, robust patent drafting in the heterocyclic drug space, fostering innovation while providing strong territorial protections.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent US 5,576,328.
  2. Patent family and prosecution records from Espacenet and WIPO patent databases.
  3. Industry literature on heterocyclic compound patents applicable to CNS and cardiovascular drugs.
  4. Market and legal analyses of patent expiry impacts in pharmaceutical markets.

In conclusion, Patent US 5,576,328 exemplifies strategic patent drafting within medicinal chemistry, offering extensive claim coverage for heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic potential. Its landscape underscores the importance of broad claims, thorough prior art searches, and international filings in establishing a defensible and valuable patent portfolio.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,576,328

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.