Details for Patent: 5,573,751
Summary for Patent: 5,573,751
| Title: | Persistent gaseous bubbles as ultrasound contrast media | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | Disclosed herein are agents for enhancing the contrast in an ultrasound image. These agents are extremely small bubbles, or "microbubbles," comprised of specially selected gases. The microbubbles described herein exhibit long life spans in solution and may be produced at a size small enough to traverse the lungs, thus enabling improved ultrasound imaging of the cardiovascular system and other vital organs. Also disclosed herein is a method for selecting gases from which contrast agents may be produced. The method is based on calculations using inherent physical properties of gases and describes a means to associate the properties of a gas with the time for dissolution of a microbubble comprised of the gas. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Steven C. Quay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | GE Healthcare Ltd , GE Healthcare AS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US08/361,118 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Composition; Compound; Delivery; Dosage form; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | United States Patent 5,573,751: Claim Scope, Expiration, and Ultrasound Contrast-Agent Patent LandscapeU.S. Patent No. 5,573,751 covers fluorinated-gas ultrasound contrast agents, including perfluoropropane, perfluorobutane, sulfur hexafluoride, and related fluorine-containing gases used in microbubbles, liposomes, microspheres, crystals, emulsions, and aqueous suspensions. The patent issued November 12, 1996, and its enforceable term expired in November 2013 under the pre-1995 patent-term rules. It therefore presents no current U.S. blocking risk, although it remains relevant as prior art and as a historical foundation for products such as Optison, Definity, Lumason, and other ultrasound contrast agents. What does U.S. Patent 5,573,751 cover?The patent claims ultrasound contrast media that use fluorinated gases to improve acoustic persistence, gas stability, or image contrast relative to conventional air-filled agents. The claims fall into five technical groups:
The patent is directed principally to composition claims. It does not depend on a particular imaging machine, ultrasound frequency, imaging protocol, injection rate, or diagnostic indication. What fluorinated gases are claimed?Claim 1 recites a Markush group covering seven specified compounds:
Claims 2 and 3 narrow claim 1 to octafluoropropane and decafluorobutane, respectively. Claims 4 through 11 separately claim perfluoropropane and perfluorobutane. In commercial ultrasound terminology:
This distinction matters. The claim set includes both linear and cyclic fluorocarbon species, and “perfluorobutane” should not automatically be treated as synonymous with octafluorocyclobutane. How broad is claim 1?Claim 1 is the broadest claim in the patent. It requires:
The claim does not expressly require:
The principal limitation is the closed chemical selection. A composition using a fluorinated gas outside the listed group would not literally satisfy claim 1, although it could implicate another claim or raise an equivalents issue in a live patent dispute. Claims 2 and 3 are narrower species claims. They offer no additional structural limitation beyond the specific gas selection. Which claims cover perflutren and perfluorobutane?Claims 4 through 11 are directed to perfluoropropane and perfluorobutane agents.
Claims 4 and 8 are composition claims with relatively limited express structural detail. The word “comprising” makes them open-ended. A formulation containing perfluoropropane plus additional gases, excipients, shells, or stabilizers could fall within the claims if the remaining limitations were satisfied. The dependent claims add practical formulation limitations. They are more relevant to commercial products because ultrasound contrast agents generally contain gas within a carrier and have particle distributions below the pulmonary capillary size range. What formulations are protected by claims 12 through 22?Gas-filled liposomesClaims 12 through 14 cover gas-filled liposomes in which at least one fluorine-containing gas is included. Claim 13 identifies:
Claim 14 limits the liposomes to less than eight microns in diameter. These claims are directed to a platform rather than a single marketed product. They combine the gas-containing liposome structure with fluorinated gas chemistry. Encapsulated microspheresClaims 15 through 18 cover encapsulated air-filled microspheres in which all or part of the air is replaced by a fluorinated gas. Claim 16 specifies microspheres measuring 2 to 4 microns. Claim 18 specifies microspheres formed from denatured proteins. This group is particularly relevant to protein-shell products. The claims focus on gas composition and particle structure, not on a particular protein sequence or manufacturing process. Crystals in saccharide diluentsClaims 19 and 20 cover a contrast agent containing crystals suspended in a saccharide diluent, with microbubbles of perfluoroethane, perfluoropropane, perfluorobutane, or sulfur hexafluoride. Claim 20 recites crystals ranging from 5 to 10 microns. These claims are narrower and structurally distinct from the broad microbubble claims. EmulsionsClaim 21 covers an emulsion of highly fluorinated organic compounds that also provides microbubbles of at least one gaseous fluorine-containing chemical. The claim could reach formulations combining fluorinated liquid-phase materials with a gas-containing microbubble population. It is not limited to a specific emulsifier, droplet size, shell material, or route of administration. Air-filled microbubble suspensionsClaim 22 covers an air-filled microbubble suspension in which the bubbles contain perfluoroethane, perfluorobutane, perfluoropropane, or sulfur hexafluoride. This claim is broader in formulation architecture than claims 12 and 15 because it does not expressly require liposomes, denatured proteins, or a specified encapsulating material. What was the patent’s expiration date?U.S. Patent 5,573,751 issued on November 12, 1996. Because the application was filed before the June 8, 1995 transition to the modern twenty-year term, the applicable term generally ran for the longer of:
On that basis, the patent expired in November 2013, subject to any patent-term adjustment, terminal disclaimer, or other recorded event. Public patent records identify no current enforceable term for the issued claims.
The expiration eliminates present infringement liability under the issued U.S. claims. The patent remains relevant for prior-art analysis, freedom-to-operate history, validity review, and interpretation of later patents. Is U.S. Patent 5,573,751 listed in the Orange Book?A patent does not receive Orange Book protection merely because it covers a pharmaceutical or diagnostic composition. Listing depends on an approved drug product, the holder’s submission to FDA, and whether the patent claims an approved product or an approved method of use under FDA listing rules. U.S. Patent 5,573,751 should not be treated as an active Orange Book barrier for current ultrasound contrast products. Its 2013 expiration independently removes any current exclusivity even if it was historically associated with a product or patent-family strategy. For products such as Definity, Optison, and Lumason, the operative patent analysis must be conducted against the patents specifically listed for each product and against later patents covering shell composition, manufacturing, dosing, imaging use, or product-specific formulations. The existence of Patent 5,573,751 does not establish that every fluorinated-gas contrast product has the same Orange Book status. Which commercial products are technically adjacent?
These products may practice the technical concepts described in the patent, but none faces current U.S. infringement exposure from Patent 5,573,751 because the patent has expired. Did the patent create a blocking position against Optison or Definity?The claims are broad enough to encompass important product architectures:
That scope does not establish that the patent was the only relevant patent. Commercial products typically depend on layered patent estates covering:
A product could therefore have been covered by the 5,573,751 claims while also relying on separate patents for its commercial implementation. Were Paragraph IV challenges or settlements associated with this patent?No current Paragraph IV risk arises from Patent 5,573,751 because the patent expired before the modern generic-entry disputes involving many ultrasound contrast products became commercially significant. Paragraph IV litigation is product-specific. A generic or competing applicant must challenge patents listed for the reference product, not every patent that broadly describes the same active gas or microbubble concept. The relevant disputes for Optison, Definity, and Lumason must therefore be evaluated through their individual FDA listings, approved labeling, ANDA or 505(b)(2) pathway, and patent-family records. Patent 5,573,751 does not create a current statutory stay, launch bar, or automatic litigation trigger. What manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers remain?The expired patent removed the broadest early composition barrier, but technical entry barriers remain in several areas: Shell engineeringCommercial products require narrow particle-size distributions, adequate acoustic response, circulation stability, and acceptable pulmonary safety. Lipid, protein, and polymer shells produce different stability and reconstitution profiles. Gas retentionPerfluoropropane and sulfur hexafluoride have different diffusion and dissolution behavior. Gas retention affects shelf life, circulation time, acoustic persistence, and product handling. Sterile manufactureManufacturers must control aseptic processing, vial filling, lyophilization or suspension stability, particulate burden, and reconstitution performance. Clinical and regulatory dataFDA approval requires product-specific chemistry, manufacturing, controls, clinical performance, and safety data. A competitor cannot generally rely on the expired patent alone to obtain approval. Later patent familiesThe most relevant live rights are likely to be later-generation patents covering:
The commercial strength of a current patent estate therefore depends more on later formulation and manufacturing claims than on the expired broad gas-selection claims in Patent 5,573,751. How strong is the patent estate today?As an enforceable U.S. asset, Patent 5,573,751 has no remaining strength because its claims expired in 2013. As prior art, it is significant. The patent discloses the core proposition that stable fluorinated gases can replace air in ultrasound contrast microbubbles and can be used in liposomes, protein microspheres, emulsions, and related delivery systems. Later applicants seeking patents on fluorinated-gas contrast products must distinguish their inventions through structure, formulation, manufacturing, particle characteristics, therapeutic use, or performance limitations.
Key Takeaways
FAQsDoes U.S. Patent 5,573,751 cover Definity?Its claims are technically broad enough to read on perfluoropropane-containing lipid microspheres, which are the core platform used by Definity. The patent expired in 2013 and therefore cannot currently block Definity or a competing product. Does the patent cover Lumason?Claims 12, 13, 17, 19, and 22 expressly identify sulfur hexafluoride or fluorinated-gas microbubbles. Lumason uses sulfur hexafluoride in phospholipid microspheres, making it technically relevant. The patent’s expiration eliminates current U.S. enforcement risk. Is perfluorobutane the same as octafluorocyclobutane?No. Perfluorobutane generally refers to a C4F10 compound, while octafluorocyclobutane is a cyclic C4F8 compound. The patent lists both types of fluorinated compounds in different claim language. Can a company launch a fluorinated-gas ultrasound contrast agent without licensing this patent?Yes, with respect to Patent 5,573,751, because the U.S. patent expired in 2013. A launch still requires review of later patents, FDA approval requirements, product-specific exclusivities, and third-party rights. Does the patent protect a method of diagnosing a patient?The supplied claims are composition claims. They do not expressly claim administering the agent, imaging a patient, or diagnosing a disease. Later patents may separately claim imaging methods or clinical uses. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,573,751
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
International Family Members for US Patent 5,573,751
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 191346 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 2550392 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 3995997 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Australia | 679428 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Brazil | 1100167 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
