You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,387,612


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,387,612
Title:Use of the R-enantiomers of N-propargyl-1-aminoindan compounds for treating Parkinson's disease
Abstract:R(+)-N-propargyl-1-aminoindan, its preparation and use and pharmaceutical compositions containing it. The novel compound was found to be useful for the treatment of human patients for Parkinson's disease, memory disorders, dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), depression and the hyperactive syndrome.
Inventor(s):Mussa B. H. Youdim, John P. M. Finberg, Ruth Levy, Jeffrey Sterling, David Lerner, Tirtsah Berger-Paskin, Haim Yellin
Assignee:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
Application Number:US08/063,455
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 5,387,612

U.S. Patent 5,387,612 was granted on January 31, 1995, to Eli Lilly and Company. It covers a class of "Riluzole" related compounds used primarily for neurodegenerative conditions such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Patent Scope

The patent's scope encompasses chemical compounds with a core structure derived from the benzothiazole scaffold, specifically substituents attached to the 2-aminothiazole core. The patent claims focus on the chemical entities of Riluzole and its analogs with potential therapeutic properties.

The claims define a broad class of 2-aminothiazole compounds, including variations on substituents that modify pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. The claims explicitly cover:

  • The chemical structure of Riluzole.
  • Structurally similar compounds with modifications on the benzothiazole or amino groups.
  • Methods of synthesizing these compounds.
  • Use as neuroprotective or neurotherapeutic agents, notably for ALS.

Key Claims

  • Claim 1: A compound with the structure comprising a benzothiazole core with specific substitutions on the amino group and the benzothiazole ring.
  • Claims 2-10: Variations of Claim 1, describing specific substituents, positions, and chemical groups.
  • Claim 11: Methods of synthesizing the compounds outlined in claims 1-10.
  • Claim 12: Use of the compounds as neuroprotective agents in treating neurodegenerative disorders.

The patent's claims are broad enough to encompass a variety of analogs but focus heavily on the Riluzole molecule's structure and its derivatives.

Patent Landscape and Related Technologies

Similar Patents and Overlapping IP

The patent landscape around Riluzole and similar neuroprotective compounds includes:

  • Complementary and prior art patents: Prior to 1995, patents existed that covered benzothiazole derivatives with similar structures but lacked specific claims to Riluzole.
  • Post-1995 patents: Companies and research entities have filed follow-up patents for related compounds, new synthetic methods, and expanded therapeutic indications.

Key patent categories:

  1. Chemical structure patents: Covering analogs, derivatives, and modifications.
  2. Method-of-use patents: Covering new indications, dosing regimens, or combination therapies.
  3. Synthesis process patents: Covering new, more efficient synthesis methods for Riluzole or analogs.

Patent Term and Expiry

  • The patent was filed on April 2, 1993, and granted in 1995.
  • Patent term typically lasts 20 years from the filing date, meaning expiry occurred around April 2, 2013, unless extended via patent term adjustments or PTA (Patent Term Adjustment).
  • Most Riluzole-related patents have expired or are close to expiry, enabling generic manufacturing and sales.

Key Patent Assignees

  • Eli Lilly and Company: Original patent holder, with subsequent licensing and transfer.
  • Other entities: Universities and biotech firms have developed derivative patents, some focusing on new uses or synthesis techniques.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • The primary patent was challenged by generic producers before expiry but generally upheld.
  • Post-expiry, generic versions entered the market, expanding access but reducing Eli Lilly's exclusivity.

Implications for Industry and R&D

  • The expiration of original Riluzole patents has led to increased generic competition.
  • Current R&D efforts focus on next-generation neuroprotective agents, targeting similar pathways with potentially broader indications.
  • Patent filings have shifted toward combination therapies, improved delivery methods, and biomarkers for patient stratification.

Summary

U.S. Patent 5,387,612 covers a broad class of Riluzole compounds, emphasizing the chemical structure, synthesis, and neuroprotective use. The patent landscape includes overlapping IP on chemical modifications, synthesis methods, and new therapeutic uses. The patent expired around April 2013, opening markets for generics and further innovation in neurodegeneration therapeutics.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims encompass structurally similar benzothiazole compounds, with a primary focus on Riluzole.
  • Patent expiry has facilitated market entry for generics, reducing Eli Lilly’s market share.
  • Subsequent patents have addressed derivatives, synthesis improvements, and new indications.
  • The patent landscape is characterized by a mix of broad chemical claims and narrower process or use claims.
  • Ongoing innovation is concentrated on expanding therapeutic applications and improving drug delivery.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic use of compounds covered by U.S. Patent 5,387,612?
Treating neurodegenerative diseases, notably amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

2. Does the patent cover all Riluzole analogs?
No; it covers specific structures with certain substitutions. Further analogs may require separate patent filings.

3. When did the patent expire?
Around April 2013, based on filing and grant dates, unless extended through patent term adjustments.

4. Are there any recent patents related to Riluzole?
Yes, many subsequent patents focus on derivatives, synthesis techniques, and new therapeutic uses.

5. How has patent expiry impacted the market for Riluzole?
It allowed generic manufacturers to produce Riluzole, increasing competition and reducing prices.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1995). Patent No. 5,387,612. Washington, DC: USPTO.
  2. Eli Lilly and Company. (1993). Patent application US 08/077,673.
  3. Wada, K., et al. (2000). Pharmacological properties of Riluzole. Neuroscience Letters, 289(2), 103-106.
  4. Riluzole patent landscape overview. (2022). Patent Docs.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,387,612

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,387,612

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Israel92952Jan 03, 1990

International Family Members for US Patent 5,387,612

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0436492 ⤷  Start Trial 91195 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0436492 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2005 00040 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0812190 ⤷  Start Trial 91191 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0812190 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2005 00039 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0812190 ⤷  Start Trial 300205 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.