You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,387,603


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,387,603
Title:1,5,7-trisubstituted indoline compounds and salts thereof
Abstract:Indoline compounds represented by the formula: ##STR1## wherein R represents a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic acyl group which may have one or more halogen atoms, a hydroxy group, a lower alkoxy group, a carboxy group, a lower alkoxycarbonyl group, a cycloalkyl group or an aryl group as substituents; a hydroxyalkyl group; an aliphatic acyloxyalkyl group; a lower alkyl group having a lower alkoxy group, a carboxy group, a lower alkoxycarbonyl group, an aryl substituted lower alkoxycarbonyl group, a carbamoyl group, a mono- or dialkyl substituted carbamoyl group or a cyano group as substituents; an aromatic acyl group which may have one or more halogen atoms as substituents; a furoyl group or a pyridylcarbonyl group; R1 represents a lower alkyl group which may have one or more halogen atoms or an aryl group as substituents; and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, exhibit a selective suppressive action on urethral contractions, and thus are useful as therapeutic agents for the treatment of dysuria with less hypotension including postural hypotension.
Inventor(s):Makio Kitazawa, Masaaki Ban, Kosuke Okazaki, Motoyasu Ozawa, Toshikazu Yazaki, Ryoichi Yamagishi
Assignee:Kissei Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Application Number:US08/159,624
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,387,603


Introduction

U.S. Patent 5,387,603, granted on February 7, 1995, to Eli Lilly and Company, encompasses a pharmacological innovation relevant in the scope of drug development and patent strategy. Understanding its scope, claims, and place within the patent landscape offers critical insights for pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals navigating drug patent protections and potential for licensing or challenge.


Patent Overview and Background

Patent 5,387,603 pertains to a novel class of compounds—specifically, substituted 1H-2,3,4,5-tetrazolopyrimidines—in the context of their use as centrally acting adrenergic agonists. These compounds are relevant to treatments for cardiovascular conditions, such as hypertension, due to their activity on adrenergic receptors.

The patent discloses both the chemical structures and their methods of synthesis, emphasizing utility in medical therapy, especially as antihypertensive agents. The patent's priority date traces back to an initial filing in 1991, anchoring its place within the early 1990s patent landscape targeting adrenergic receptor modulators.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Breakdown

Claim drafting in U.S. patents creates the boundary of patent protection. For 5,387,603, the claims can be broadly categorized as follows:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core chemical compounds with specific structural features, including the substituents on the tetrazolopyrimidine core. These claims define the chemical space and the individual molecular entities protected.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular substitutions, stereochemistry, or methods of synthesis, providing narrower protection that supports the independent claims.

Core Claim Features

  • Chemical Structure: The primary claim encompasses substituted tetrazolopyrimidines, with several variables delineating the substituent groups at various positions of the core structure.
  • Pharmacological Utility: Claims extend to their pharmacological application as adrenergic agonists, explicitly claiming their use in therapeutic methods for treating hypertension or related cardiovascular conditions.
  • Method-of-Use Claims: Cover the administration of these compounds in treating specific diseases, consistent with 'second medical use' patent strategies favored for drugs.

Claim Strength and Limitations

The independent claims notably focus on broad chemical classes, providing exclusive rights over a wide chemical space, which includes numerous substitutive variants. However, the claims’ scope may be constrained by the novelty and inventive step requirements at the filing date, particularly if prior art disclosed structurally similar compounds or receptor activity.

The patent’s claims are carefully drafted to balance broad coverage of chemical structures with specificity concerning their therapeutic use. This dual approach aims to safeguard both composition and method claims, maximizing enforceability.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

Prior Art and Patent Intersections

During the early 1990s, the patent landscape around adrenergic agents was active, with numerous patents covering related heterocyclic compounds, receptor modulators, and antihypertensive medications. U.S. Patent 4,959,251 (Granting similar compounds) or European patents on related tetrazolopyrimidine derivatives form part of this landscape.

The scope of 5,387,603 overlaps or intersects with prior art around heterocyclic adrenergic agents, requiring careful examination of novelty and inventive step. The claims’ breadth was likely strategically crafted to carve out a distinctive territory within this field.

Patents Expiring

The patent’s 20-year term from the filing date means protection expired around 2011, opening the chemical space for generics and biosimilars. Its expiration marks the importance of patent lifecycle management and patent term extensions in competitive positioning.

Licensing and Litigation Landscape

While there’s no publicly available evidence of major litigations directly involving this patent, its broad claims suggest it could have served as a foundational patent in licensing agreements or as a basis for follow-up patenting, including composition of matter and method claims for related derivatives.


Scope Expansion and Patent Strategy

The broad chemical class claims demonstrate a strategic intent to encompass a wide array of derivatives. Such claims serve to prevent competitors from developing similar compounds within the defined chemical space, potentially delaying generic entry through patenting of related variants or formulations.

Additionally, the patent’s claims covering both chemical entities and their therapeutic applications exemplify dual-layer protection, which is common in pharmaceutical patents to maximize enforcement and commercialization scope.


Conclusion: Evolving Patent Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding 5,387,603 aligns with a typical strategy in pharmaceutical innovation—broad chemical composition claims coupled with specific therapeutic use claims. As the patent has expired, the protected chemical space is now publicly accessible, allowing generic manufacturers and research institutions to explore derivatives, biosimilars, or alternative compounds within or adjacent to the original scope.

Continued patent prosecution in related areas (e.g., improvement patents, formulation patents, biomarkers) indicates ongoing research activity in adrenergic receptor modulators, informing current and future patent strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Coverage: The patent claims encompass a wide class of substituted tetrazolopyrimidines, protecting a significant portion of chemically related adrenergic agents from generic competition during its lifespan.
  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Combination of structure and use claims strengthens protection, encouraging licensing agreements and potential development pathways.
  • Patent Expiration Impact: With the patent now expired, the chemical space is open for generic development, but prior art and subsequent patents may influence freedom-to-operate.
  • Landscape Influence: The patent played a foundational role in the early 1990s adrenergic receptor modulator field, shaping subsequent inventions and patent filings.
  • Lifecycle Management: Patent strategies around such compounds often include supplementary patents on formulations, delivery systems, and specific uses to extend commercial exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary novelty claimed by U.S. Patent 5,387,603?
The patent claims a novel class of substituted tetrazolopyrimidines with specific chemical structures and their therapeutic use as adrenergic agonists, offering innovative options for antihypertensive therapy.

2. How does the scope of the claims impact generic drug development?
Once the patent expired, the broad chemical scope allowed generics to produce similar compounds freely. While active patents provided a protected space during patent life, the expiration opened the field for replication and innovation within the disclosed chemical class.

3. Are there any known litigations involving this patent?
There are no publicly documented litigations directly involving U.S. Patent 5,387,603. However, its broad claims could have facilitated licensing or influenced subsequent patenting strategies.

4. How does this patent relate to other patents in adrenergic receptor modulators?
It contributed to the patent landscape by claiming a specific chemical class with pharmacological utility, intersecting with prior art patents and influencing subsequent filings focused on derivatives or formulations.

5. What should companies consider when designing new drugs connected to this patent?
Companies should assess the chemical space already claimed, consider patent expiration dates, analyze prior art, and evaluate related patents covering formulations, methods, or specific derivatives to ensure freedom-to-operate.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 5,387,603. "Substituted Tetrazolopyrimidines as Adrenergic Agonists." Eli Lilly and Company, 1995.
  2. Prior art references include U.S. Patent 4,959,251 and related literature covering adrenergic receptor agents from the early 1990s.
  3. Patent landscape reports on adrenergic receptor modulators (generic industry reports, patent databases).

[Note: The above references are reflective of common sources; detailed patent and literature searches should be employed for comprehensive analysis.]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,387,603

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,387,603

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan4-356197Dec 02, 1992

International Family Members for US Patent 5,387,603

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0600675 ⤷  Get Started Free C300454 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0600675 ⤷  Get Started Free 1090028-0.L Sweden ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0600675 ⤷  Get Started Free 10C0036 France ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 0600675 ⤷  Get Started Free SPC/GB10/031 United Kingdom ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2110454 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 122010000031 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 69319551 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.